Medial Flap Coblation Turbinoplasty Versus Submucous Resection: Outcomes

Abstract

Background

Variable surgical options are available for turbinate reduction. These options include total turbinectomy, partial turbinectomy, submucosal resection, laser surgery, cryosurgery, electrocautery, radiofrequency ablation, and turbinate out-fracture. However, there remains a lack of consensus for the preferred technique.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to describe the use of coblation for medial flap turbinoplasty procedure. Furthermore, the outcomes of this technique were compared to submucous resection in terms of improvement of patients’ symptoms, postoperative bleeding, crusting, and pain scores.

Methods

This prospective, randomized, comparative surgical trial was conducted on 90 patients. Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups: medial flap coblation turbinoplasty group (n = 45), and submucous resection group (n = 45). The outcomes of both techniques were analyzed and compared.

Results

Both techniques were equally in alleviating patients’ symptoms of nasal obstruction. However, postoperative healing was significantly better in medial flap coblation turbinoplasty group. Additionally medial flap turbinoplasty showed a statistically significant better outcome in terms of postoperative bleeding, crusting and pain scores.

Conclusion

Both submucous resection and medial flap coblation turbinoplasty are effective in relieving nasal obstruction and enabling optimal volume reduction with preservation of function of the inferior turbinate. Coblation turbinoplasty has superior outcomes in terms of better healing and less postoperative pain and crusting.