BenosDJBashariEChavesJM, et al.The ups and downs of peer review. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007;31(2):145–152. doi:10.1152/advan.00104.2006
2.
JeffersonTWagerEDavidoffF. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA. 2002;287(21):2786–2790. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2786.
3.
HoRCMMakKKTaoR, et al.Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: An online survey of academics from high-ranking universities. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:74. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-74
4.
WareMMonkmanM. Peer review in scholarly journals—perspective of the scholarly community: an international study.Publishing Research Consortium;2008. http://www.publishingresearch.net/PeerReview.htm.
5.
HaldermanAARaoADesai-MarkowskiS, et al.Gender and authorship trends in rhinology, allergy, and skull-base literature from 2008 to 2018. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021 Sep;11(9):1336–1346. doi:10.1002/alr.22793.
6.
ChoMKJusticeACWinkerMA,et al.Masking author identity in peer review: What factors influence masking success? PEER investigators. J Am Med Assoc. 1998;280(3):243–245. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.243