Nasal adhesions (NAs) are a known complication of nasal airway surgery. Even minor NAs can lead to significant postoperative nasal airway obstruction (NAO). Division of such NAs often provides much greater relief than anticipated.
Objective
We examine the impact of NAs at various anatomical sites on nasal airflow and mucosal cooling using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and multiple test subjects.
Methods
CT scans of healthy adult subjects were used to construct three-dimensional nasal airway computational models. A single virtual 2.5 mm diameter NA was placed at one of five sites commonly seen following NAO surgery within each nasal cavity bilaterally, resulting in 10 NA models and 1 NA-free control for each subject. CFD analysis was performed on each NA model and compared with the subject's NA-free control model.
Results
4 subjects were recruited to create 44 computational models. The NAs caused the airflow streamlines to separate, leading to a statistically significant increase in mucosal temperature immediately downstream to the NAs (wake region). Changes in the mucosal temperature in the wake region of the NAs were most prominent in anteriorly located NAs with a mean increase of 1.62 °C for the anterior inferior turbinate NAs (P < .001) and 0.63 °C for the internal valve NAs (P < .001).
Conclusion
NAs result in marked disruption to airflow patterns and reduced mucosal cooling on critical surfaces, particularly in the wake region. Reduced wake region mucosal cooling may be a contributing factor to the exaggerated perception of nasal obstruction experienced by patients with NAs.
KimmelmanCP. The problem of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1989;22(2):253–264.
2.
CherryDKHingEWoodwellDARechtsteinerEA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008;3:1–39.
3.
McCaffreyTVKernEB. Clinical evaluation of nasal obstruction. A study of 1,000 patients. Arch Otolaryngol. 1979;105(9):542–545.
4.
StewartMGWitsellDLSmithTLWeaverEMYuehBHannleyMT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(2):157–163.
CoxDRWiseSK. Medical treatment of nasal airway obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018;51(5):897–908.
7.
FettmanNSanfordTSindwaniR. Surgical management of the deviated septum: techniques in septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42(2):241–252. viii.
8.
YamasakiALevesquePABleierBS, et al.Improvement in nasal obstruction and quality of life after septorhinoplasty and turbinate surgery. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(7):1554–1560.
9.
HenriquezOASchlosserRJMaceJCSmithTLSolerZM. Impact of synechiae after endoscopic sinus surgery on long-term outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(11):2615–2619.
10.
ChengYXueFWangTY, et al.Analyses and treatments of postoperative nasal complications after endonasal transsphenoidal resection of pituitary neoplasms. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(15):e6614.
11.
VartiainenENuutinenJ. Head and neck manifestations of Wegener's granulomatosis. Ear Nose Throat J. 1992;71(9):423–424. 7-8.
12.
JonesNS. Nasal manifestations of rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58(10):589–590.
13.
ChoiKYChoSWChoiJJ, et al.Healing of the nasal septal mucosa in an experimental rabbit model of mucosal injury. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;3(1):17–23.
14.
NayakDRBalakrishnanRHazarikaP. Prevention and management of synechia in pediatric endoscopic sinus surgery using dental wax plates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;46(3):171–178.
15.
ChandraRKPatadiaMORavivJ. Diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42(2):207–225. vii.
16.
NaghibzadehBPeyvandiAANaghibzadehG. Does post septoplasty nasal packing reduce complications?Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(1):9–12.
17.
JoshiRRRileyCAKackerA. Complication rates following septoplasty with Inferior turbinate reduction. Ochsner J. 2019;19(4):353–356.
18.
ChenYYHuangTC. Outcome of septoplasty with Inferior turbinectomy as an in-patient or out-patient procedure. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7573.
19.
DenizMCiftciZIsikADemirelOBGultekinE. The impact of different nasal packings on postoperative complications. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014;35(5):554–557.
20.
BeekhuisGJ. Nasal obstruction after rhinoplasty: etiology, and techniques for correction. Laryngoscope. 1976;86(4):540–548.
21.
DerinSSahanMDeveerMErdoganSTetikerHKoseogluS. The causes of persistent and recurrent nasal obstruction after primary septoplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(4):828–830.
22.
Joe JacobKGeorgeSPreethiSArunrajVS. A comparative study between endoscopic middle meatal antrostomy and caldwell-luc surgery in the treatment of chronic maxillary sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;63(3):214–219.
23.
YoungTFinnLKimH. Nasal obstruction as a risk factor for sleep-disordered breathing. The University of Wisconsin Sleep and Respiratory Research Group. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99(2):S757–S762.
24.
BeckerDGRansomEGuyCBloomJ. Surgical treatment of nasal obstruction in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(3):347–378. quiz 79-80.
25.
RettingerGKirscheH. Complications in septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(4):289–297.
26.
QuinnJGBonaparteJPKiltySJ. Postoperative management in the prevention of complications after septoplasty: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(6):1328–1333.
27.
KimSJChangDSChoiMSLeeHYPyoJS. Efficacy of nasal septal splints for preventing complications after septoplasty: a meta-analysis. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021;42(3):102389.
28.
WangYPWangMCChenYCLeuYSLinHCLeeKS. The effects of Vaseline gauze strip, Merocel, and Nasopore on the formation of synechiae and excessive granulation tissue in the middle meatus and the incidence of major postoperative bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery. J Chin Med Assoc. 2011;74(1):16–21.
29.
CatalanoPJRoffmanEJ. Evaluation of middle meatal stenting after minimally invasive sinus techniques (MIST). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;128(6):875–881.
30.
LauJElhassanHASinghN. History of intranasal splints. J Laryngol Otol. 2018;132(3):198–201.
31.
EcclesRJonesAS. The effect of menthol on nasal resistance to air flow. J Laryngol Otol. 1983;97(8):705–709.
32.
TjahjonoRSinghN. Correlation between nasal mucosal temperature change and the perception of nasal patency: a literature review. J Laryngol Otol. 2021;135(2):104–109.
33.
BabesACiobanuACNeacsuCBabesRM. TRPM8, A sensor for mild cooling in mammalian sensory nerve endings. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2011;12(1):78–88.
34.
SozanskyJHouserSM. The physiological mechanism for sensing nasal airflow: a literature review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(10):834–838.
35.
SeniorBA. Computational fluid dynamics and the study of sinonasal pathophysiology. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(7):643–644.
36.
TuJInthavongKAhmadiG. Reconstruction of the human airways. In: Computational fluid and particle dynamics in the human respiratory system, pp. 45–71. Springer; 2013.
37.
LindemannJRettingerGKrogerRSommerF. Numerical simulation of airflow patterns in nose models with differently localized septal perforations. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(9):2085–2089.
38.
NishijimaHKondoKYamamotoT, et al.Influence of the location of nasal polyps on olfactory airflow and olfaction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018;8(6):695–706.
39.
Frank-ItoDOKimbellJSBorojeniAATGarciaGJMRheeJS. A hierarchical stepwise approach to evaluate nasal patency after virtual surgery for nasal airway obstruction. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019;61(Jan):172–180.
40.
InthavongKShangYWongESinghN. Characterization of nasal irrigation flow from a squeeze bottle using computational fluid dynamics. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020;10(1):29–40.
41.
InthavongKTianZFTuJYYangWXueC. Optimising nasal spray parameters for efficient drug delivery using computational fluid dynamics. Comput Biol Med. 2008;38(6):713–726.
42.
AlamSLiCBradburnKHZhaoKLeeTS. Impact of middle turbinectomy on airflow to the olfactory cleft: a computational fluid dynamics study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2019;33(3):263–268.
43.
SenanayakePSalatiHWongE, et al.The impact of nasal adhesions on airflow and mucosal cooling – a computational fluid dynamics analysis. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2021;293(Nov):103719.
44.
BassKLongestPW. Recommendations for simulating microparticle deposition at conditions similar to the upper airways with two-equation turbulence models. J Aerosol Sci. 2018;119(May):31–50.
45.
Frank-ItoDOWoffordMSchroeterJDKimbellJS. Influence of mesh density on airflow and particle deposition in Sinonasal airway modeling. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2016;29(1):46–56.
46.
InthavongKChettyAShangYTuJ. Examining mesh independence for flow dynamics in the human nasal cavity. Comput Biol Med. 2018;102(Nov):40–50.
47.
KanedaSIidaMYamamotoH, et al.Evaluation of nasal airflow and resistance: computational modeling for experimental measurements. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2019;44(3):59–67.
48.
XiangLFa-yaLPingH, et al.Management of radiation-induced early nasal adhesion after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(4):e82–e84.
49.
ClarkeRWJonesAS. Nasal airflow receptors: the relative importance of temperature and tactile stimulation. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1992;17(5):388–392.
50.
ZhaoKBlackerKLuoYBryantBJiangJ. Perceiving nasal patency through mucosal cooling rather than air temperature or nasal resistance. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e24618.
51.
SullivanCDGarciaGJFrank-ItoDOKimbellJSRheeJS. Perception of better nasal patency correlates with increased mucosal cooling after surgery for nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(1):139–147.
52.
ZhaoKJiangJBlackerK, et al.Regional peak mucosal cooling predicts the perception of nasal patency. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(3):589–595.
53.
KehSMFacerPYehiaASandhuGSalehHAAnandP. The menthol and cold sensation receptor TRPM8 in Normal human nasal mucosa and rhinitis. Rhinology. 2011;49(4):453–457.
54.
LiuSCLuHHChengLH, et al.Identification of the cold receptor TRPM8 in the nasal mucosa. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015;29(4):e112–e116.
