Utility of the Nasoseptal “Rescue” Flap Approach: Analysis of 125 Consecutive Patients and Implications for Routine Transsphenoidal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

The nasoseptal flap (NSF) is the reconstructive workhorse for endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS). However, there is morbidity associated with its use and it is not always required for reconstruction. The bilateral nasoseptal “rescue” flap (NSRF) technique offers a quicker alternative to upfront NSF harvest, yet permits the use of a tailored NSF if needed after the defect has been created. The utility and implications of this strategy have not been well studied.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 125 consecutive transsphenoidal cases where an NSRF approach was used from January 2015 to October 2017 at the Cleveland Clinic. Records were analyzed for conversion to NSF, outcomes, and reconstruction-related complications.

Results

The mean age of patients included in the study was 51 years, with 51% females. NSRF was converted to full NSF in only 16% of cases. Rationale for conversion included an unanticipated high-flow (7) or low-flow (12) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and an exposed internal carotid artery (1). NSRF was utilized and converted to formal NSF in 3 patients who had previous remote transsphenoidal surgery. One patient who had an NSRF without a full NSF raised had a postoperative CSF leak; however, no CSF leaks or flap ischemia was noted for those who had full NSFs raised, even in revision surgery.

Conclusion

NSRF approach provides the reliability and flexibility of vascularized reconstruction, without the perioperative disadvantages of an upfront NSF harvest. The low and successful conversion rate to NSF demonstrates the utility of this strategy which should be incorporated into the standard approach for routine transsphenoidal surgery.