Frequency Spectra of Normal Expiratory Nasal Sound

Abstract

Background

The computerized analysis of the nasal sound reflects the nasal airflow. We have developed a new software program that analyzes the nasal sound to use in the research area and clinical applications. We aimed to analyze automatically the spectral parameters of nasal sound in healthy people by our new versatile PC-based nasal sound analyzer software.

Methods

In this study, we analyzed and recorded the expiratory nasal sound in 30 healthy people. This analysis includes the time-expanded waveform, the spectral analysis with time-averaged fast Fourier transform, the automatic detection, and the waveform analysis of nasal sound.

Results

We calculated the mean frequency of low-intensity sound (LIS) and high-intensity sound (HIS). The mean frequency of LIS was found as 1254 ± 10.23 Hz at the right nose and 1375 ± 18.45 Hz at the left nose. The mean frequency of HIS was found as 2453 ± 22.23 Hz at the right nose and as 2234 ± 21.12 Hz at the left nose. These results showed that the values between LIS and HIS are statistically significant (p < 0.005) and different from each other. We found that the nasal sound of the similar nasal airflow was the same type and amplitude in the analysis of the nasal sound recordings.

Conclusion

The frequency of the nasal sound is an indicator of the intensity of the nasal airflow. The method that provides the analysis of the nasal sound may lead to a new diagnostic method. The method, which is noninvasive, rapid, of low cost, and even applicable for small children, requires little cooperation of the subjects. In addition, it will be possible to record and save the analysis of the nasal airflow as digital data.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chapman

C.J.

Acoustic waves in fluids, elastic waves in solids, electromagnetic waves. In Handbook of Radiation and Scattering of Waves. De Hoop

A.T.

(ed.). London: Academic Press, 219, 1995.

Cole

Biophysics of nasal airflow: A review.

Am J Rhinol 14: 245–249, 2000.

Kelly

J.T.

, Prasad

A.K.

, and Wexler

A.S.

Detailed flow patterns in the nasal cavity.

J Appl Physiol 89: 323–337, 2000.

Gasquet

, and Witomski

(Eds.). Filtering, numerical computation, wavelets/C. In Analyse de Fourier et Applications. Paris: Masson, 11–31, 1990.

Strang

Wavelet transforms versus Fourier transforms.

Bull Am Math Soc 28: 288–305, 1993.

Saidi

Decimation-in-time-frequency FFT algorithm.

In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (IEEE ICASSP), Adelaide, Australia, 453–456, 1994.

Barrera-Figueroa

, Rasmussen

, and Jacobsen

A time-selective technique for free-field reciprocity calibration of condenser microphones.

J Acoust Soc Am 114: 1467–1476, 2003.

Cheetham

B.M.G.

, Giordano

, Helistö

Digitisation of data for respiratory sound recordings.

Eur Respir Rev 10: 621–624, 2000.

Gilain

, Coste

, Ricolfi

Nasal cavity geometry measured by acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123: 401–405, 1997.

10.

Charbonneau

, Sudraud

, and Soufflet

Method for the evaluation of flow rate from pulmonary sounds.

Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 23: 265–270, 1987.

11.

Kraman

S.S.

, Pasterkamp

, Kompis

Effects of breathing pathways on tracheal sound spectral features.

Respir Physiol 111: 295–300, 1998.

12.

Lessard

C.S.

, and Wong

W.C.

Correlation of constant flow rate with frequency spectrum of respiratory sounds when measured at the trachea.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 33: 461–463, 1986.

13.

Soufflet

, Charbonneau

, Polit

Interaction between tracheal sound and flow rate: A comparison of some different flow evaluations from lung sounds.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 37: 384–391, 1990.

14.

Hadjileontiadis

L.J.

, and Panas

S.M.

Separation of discontinuous adventitious sounds from vesicular sounds using a wavelet-based filter.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44: 1269–1281, 1997.

15.

Vannuccini

, Rossi

, and Pasquali

A new method to detect crackles in respiratory sounds.

Technol Health Care 6: 75–79, 1998.

16.

Ono

, Arakawa

, Mori

Separation of fine crackles from vesicular sounds by a nonlinear digital filter.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 36: 286–291, 1989.

17.

Kaisla

, Sovijarvi

, Piirila

Validated method for automatic detection of lung sound crackles.

Med Biol Eng Comput 29: 517–521, 1991.

18.

Arakawa

, Harashima

, Ono

Non-linear digital filters for extracting crackles from lung sounds.

Front Med Biol Eng 3: 245–257, 1992.

19.

Celebi

, Kalayci

, Aysan

Application of multivariate linear discriminant analysis to lung sounds in some pulmonary diseases.

Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 51: 42–49, 1996.

20.

Pesu

, Helisto

, Ademovic

Classification of respiratory sounds based on wavelet packet decomposition and learning vector quantization.

Technol Health Care 6: 65–74, 1998.

21.

Sovijarvi

A.R.

, Helisto

, Malmberg

L.P.

A new versatile PC-based lung sound analyzer with automatic crackle analysis (HeLSA): Repeatability of spectral parameters and sound amplitude in healthy subjects.

Technol Health Care 6: 11–22, 1998.

22.

Korpas

, Vrabec

, Sadlonova

Analysis of the cough sound frequency in adults and children with bronchial asthma.

Acta Physiol Hung 90: 27–34, 2003.

23.

Charbonneau

, Ademovic

, Cheetham

B.M.G.

Basic techniques for respiratory sound analysis.

Eur Respir Rev 10: 625–635, 2000.

24.

Rosqvist

, Paajanen

, Kallio

Toolkit for lung sound analysis.

Med Biol Eng Comput 33: 190–195, 1995.

25.

Numminen

, Ahtinen

, Huhtala

, and Rautiainen

Comparison of rhinometric measurements methods in intranasal pathology.

Rhinology 41: 65–68, 2003.

26.

Mann

W.J.

, Riechelmann

, and Hinni

M.L.

Acoustic rhinometry predictive value in septal and turbinate surgery.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol 51: 207–221, 1996.