Animal experiments indicate that 1,1,1-trichloroethane can cause degeneration of the olfactory epithelium. The effects of 1,1,1-trichloroethane on human odor perception still have not been investigated. The goal of this study was to learn more about acute effects of 1,1,1-trichloroethane.
Methods
Twelve healthy, nonsmoking students were exposed to 200 and 20 ppm (control) 1,1,1-trichloroethane in an exposure chamber for 4 hours according to a crossover design. Olfactory functioning was investigated with the Sniffin’ Sticks. The test includes the determination of the detection threshold for n-butanol and an odor identification test.
Results
After 1 hour of exposure to 200 ppm 1,1,1-trichloroethane, no effects on olfactory functioning were observed. After 4 hours, the olfactory threshold for n-butanol was slightly (p = 0.04) elevated.
Conclusion
The threshold shift may be caused by different mechanisms, including inflammation of the olfactory mucosa or degeneration of receptor cells.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
World Health Organization.1,1,1-Trichloroethane. Environmental Health Criteria 136, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1992.
2.
CalhounL.L., QuastF.J., SchumannA.M.Chloroethene VG. Preliminary studies to establish exposure concentrations for a chronic inhalation study with rats and mice.Midland, Toxicology Research Laboratory, Health and Environmental Sciences, The Dow Chemical Co., 1981. Cited in ATSDR's Toxicological Profiles on CD-ROM, Agency for Toxic and Disease Registry U.S. Public Health Service, 2000.
3.
HummelT., SekingerB., WolfS.R.“Sniffin’ sticks”: Olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory threshold.Chem Senses22: 39–52, 1997.
4.
KobalG., HummelT., SekingerB.“Sniffin’ sticks”: Screening of olfactory performance.Rhinology34: 222–226, 1996.
5.
MuttrayA., KürtenR., JungD.Acute effects of 200 ppm 1,1,1-trichloroethane on the human EEG.Eur J Med Res5: 375–384, 2000.
6.
KobalG., KlimekL., WolfensbergerM.Multicenter investigation of 1036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol257: 205–211, 2000.
7.
GamberaleF., IregrenA., and KjellbergA. (Eds.). SPES: The computerized Swedish Performance Evaluation System.In Arbete Och Hälsa, Vol. 6. Solna, Sweden: National Institute of Occupational Health, 22–25, 1989.
8.
SeeberA., BlaszkewiczM., KiesswetterE.Biomonitoring, Leistung und Befinden bei inhalativer Ethanolexposition. In Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Arbeitsmedizin und Umweltmedizin, 34. Jahrestagung.KesselR. (Ed). Stuttgart: Gentner, 205–209, 1994.
9.
KösterE.P.Adaption and cross-adaption in olfaction.In An Experimental Study with Olfactory Stimuli at Low Levels of Intensity. Doctoral Thesis, Rotterdam: Bronder-Offset, 56–58, 1971.
10.
RawsonN.E.Cell and molecular biology of olfaction.Quintessence Int30: 335–341, 1999.
11.
GetchellM.L., and GetchellT.V.Fine structural aspects of secretion and extrinsic innervation in the olfactory mucosa.Microsc Res Tech23: 111–127, 1992.
12.
MuttrayA., KlimekL., FaasM.The exposure of healthy volunteers to 200 ppm 1,1,1-trichloroethane increases the concentration of proinflammatory cytokines in nasal secretions.Int Arch Occup Environ Health72: 485–488, 1999.
13.
ChenY., GetchellT.V., SparksD.L.Patterns of adrenergic and peptidergic innervation in human olfactory mucosa: Age-related trends.J Comp Neurol334: 104–116, 1993.
14.
BiffoS., DeLuciaR., MulateroB.Carnosine-, calcitonin gene-related peptide- and tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactivity in the mouse olfactory bulb following peripheral denervation.Brain Res528: 353–357, 1990.
15.
SilverW.L., FarleyL.G., and FingerT.E.The effects of neonatal capsaicin administration on trigeminal nerve chemoreceptors in the rat nasal cavity.Brain Res561: 212–216, 1991.
16.
FingerT.E., and BöttgerB.Peripheral peptidergic fibers of the trigeminal nerve in the olfactory bulb of the rat.J Comp Neurol334: 117–124, 1993.
17.
SchaeferM.L., BöttgerB., SilverW.L.Trigeminal collaterals in the nasal epithelium and olfactory bulb: A potential route for direct modulation of olfactory information by trigeminal stimuli.J Comp Neurol444: 221–226, 2002.
18.
MalnicB., HironoJ., SatoT.Combinatorial receptor codes for odors.Cell96: 713–723, 1999.
19.
TodrankJ., WysockC.J., and BeauchampG.K.The effects of adaptation on the perception of similar and dissimilar odors.Chem Senses16: 467–482, 1991.
20.
Cometto-MunizJ.E., and CainW.S.Olfactory adaptation. In Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation.DotyR.L. (Ed). New York: Marcel Dekker, 257–281, 1995.
21.
KurahashiT., LoweG., and GoldG.H.Suppression of odorant responses by odorants in olfactory receptor cells.Science265: 118–120, 1994.
22.
EkblomA., FlockA., HanssonP.Ultrastructural and electrophysiological changes in the olfactory epithelium following exposure to organic solvents.Acta Otolaryngol98: 351–361, 1983.
23.
HardistyJ.F., GarmanR.H., HarkemaJ.R.Histopathology of nasal olfactory mucosa from selected inhalation toxicity studies conducted with volatile chemicals.Toxicol Pathol27: 618–627, 1999.
24.
KmitaThe influence of benzine vapors on the upper respiratory tract and on the organ of smell [in Polish].Med Pr4: 119–130, 1953.
25.
RossbergG., SchauppH., and SchmidtW.Geruchs- und Geschmacksvermögen bei Arbeitern der chemischen und metallver-arbeitenden Industrie (Olfaktometrische und elgustometrische Schwellenuntersuchungen).Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol45: 571–590, 1966.
26.
DragomiretskiiV.D., RasskazovaT.V., and BereznerE.J.The effect of small concentrations of solvents on the state of the mucous membrane of the upper respiratory tract [in Russian].Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn30: 16–18, 1970.
27.
SchwartzB.S., DotyR.L., MonroeC.Olfactory function in chemical workers exposed to acrylate and methacrylate vapors.Am J Public Health79: 613–618, 1989.
28.
SchwartzB.S., FordD.P., BollaK.I.Solvent-associated decrements in olfactory function in paint manufacturing workers.Am J Ind Med18: 697–706, 1990.
29.
RasmussenK., Arlien-SoborgP., and SabroeS.Clinical neurological findings among metal degreasers exposed to chlorinated solvents.Acta Neurol Scand87: 200–204, 1993.
30.
BollaK., SchwartzB., StewartW.Comparison of neurobehavioral function in workers exposed to a mixture of organic and inorganic lead and in workers exposed to solvents.Am J Ind Med27: 231–246, 1995.
