A Demographic Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma in the Era of COVID-19

Abstract

Study Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Objective:

The challenges of COVID-19 could magnify socioeconomic vulnerability for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma. This study compares subjects who presented with CMF fractures to a regional healthcare system during the pandemic with those in 2019. We hypothesized societal circumstances of 2020 would correlate with disproportionately more CMF fractures in vulnerable patients compared to pre-pandemic trends.

Methods:

An IRB approved retrospective study of CMF fracture presentations in 2019 and 2020 was performed. Demographics, injury details, and management details were collected. A residence-based poverty index was calculated for each subject utilizing census data. Pre-pandemic and pandemic cases were compared to identify differences between cohorts.

Results:

A large decrease in presentations was noted between pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts. There was significantly greater poverty the pre-pandemic cohort as compared to the pandemic cohort (P = .026). Overall, there was a significant correlation between higher poverty and violent MOI (P < .001). This association was maintained pre-pandemic, (P = .001) but was insignificant in the pandemic cohort (P = .108). Difference between cohorts with respect to violent injury was non-significant (P = .559) with non-significant difference in demographics including age (P = .390), place of injury (P = .136), employment status (P = .905), insurance status (P = .580), marital status (P = .711), ethnicity (P = .068), and gender (P = .656). Management was not significantly different between cohorts including percent hospital admission (P = .396), surgical intervention (P = .120), and time to operation (P = .109).

Conclusions:

Contrary to our hypothesis, this analysis indicates that the societal changes brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic did not magnify vulnerable populations. Some changes were noted including in volume of presentation, demographic distribution, and injury detail.

Keywords

COVID-19 craniofacial trauma demographics vulnerability incidence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

van den Elzen

MEP

Versnel

Hovius

SER

Passchier

Duivenvoorden

Mathijssen

IMJ

. Adults with congenital or acquired facial disfigurement: impact of appearance on social functioning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40(8):777–782. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2012.02.010

De Sousa

. Psychological issues in acquired facial trauma. Indian J Plast Surg. 2010;43(2):200–205. doi:10.4103/0970-0358.73452

Allareddy

Nalliah

. Epidemiology of facial fracture injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(10):2613–2618. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.057

Jin

K-S

Lee

Sohn

J-B

, et al. Fracture patterns and causes in the craniofacial region: an 8-year review of 2076 patients. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;40(1):29. doi:10.1186/s40902-018-0168-y

Roden

Tong

Surrusco

Shockley

Van Aalst

Hultman

. Changing characteristics of facial fractures treated at a regional, level 1 trauma center, from 2005 to 2010: an assessment of patient demographics, referral patterns, etiology of injury, anatomic location, and clinical outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(5):461–466. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823b69dd

Chrcanovic

. Factors influencing the incidence of maxillofacial fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;16(1):3–17. doi:10.1007/s10006-011-0280-y

Corfield

MacKay

Pell

. Association between trauma and socioeconomic deprivation: a registry-based, Scotland-wide retrospective cohort study of 9,238 patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):90. doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0275-7

Brattström

Eriksson

Larsson

Oldner

. Socio-economic status and co-morbidity as risk factors for trauma. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(2):151–157. doi:10.1007/s10654-014-9969-1

Dalstra

JAA

Kunst

Borrell

, et al. Socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of common chronic diseases: an overview of eight European countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(2):316–326. doi:10.1093/ije/dyh386

10.

Shaw

. Chronic disease disparities by county economic status and metropolitan classification, behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2013. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13. doi:10.5888/pcd13.160088

11.

Banerjee

Rai

. Social isolation in Covid-19: the impact of loneliness. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66(6):525–527. doi:10.1177/0020764020922269

12.

Balanzá-Martínez

Kapczinski

de Azevedo Cardoso

, et al. The assessment of lifestyle changes during the COVID-19 pandemic using a multidimensional scale. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2021;14(1):16–26. doi:10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.07.003

13.

Williams

Armitage

Tampe

Dienes

. Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK-based focus group study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e039334. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039334

14.

Noman

AHM

Griffiths

Pervin

Ismail

. The detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic violence against women. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;134:111–112. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.057

15.

Viero

Barbara

Montisci

Kustermann

Cattaneo

. Violence against women in the Covid-19 pandemic: A review of the literature and a call for shared strategies to tackle health and social emergencies. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;319:110650. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110650

16.

Northern Ohio Data and Information Service. Cleveland State University. Updated February, 2021. Accessed February 8, 2021. http://levin.urban.csuohio.edu/nodis/maps_thematic.html

17.

IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics. Version 27.0 . IBM Corp; 2020.

18.

Microsoft Corp. Microsoft Excel. Microsoft Corp; 2018.

19.

Microsoft Corp. Microsoft Powerpoint. Microsoft Corp; 2018.

20.

Adobe Inc. Adobe Illustrator. Adobe Systems; 2019.

21.

Birkmeyer

Barnato

Birkmeyer

Bessler

Skinner

. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admissions in the United States. Health Aff. 2020;39(11):2010–2017. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00980

22.

Garrafa

Levaggi

Miniaci

Paolillo

. When fear backfires: emergency department accesses during the Covid-19 pandemic. Health Policy. 2020;124(12):1333–1339. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.006

23.

Wong

Hawkins

Langness

Murrell

Iris

Sammann

. Where are all the patients? Addressing Covid-19 fear to encourage sick patients to seek emergency care. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery. Published online May 14, 2020. Accessed May 20, 2021. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0193

24.

Campedelli

Aziani

Favarin

. Exploring the immediate effects of COVID-19 containment policies on crime: an empirical analysis of the short-term aftermath in Los Angeles. Am J Crim Just. Published online October 19, 2020:1–24. doi:10.1007/s12103-020-09578-6

25.

Payne

Morgan

Piquero

. COVID-19 and social distancing measures in Queensland, Australia, are associated with short-term decreases in recorded violent crime. J Exp Criminol. Published online July 29, 2020:1–25. doi:10.1007/s11292-020-09441-y

26.

Garude

Natalwala

Hughes

West

Bhat

. Patterns of adult and paediatric hand trauma during the COVID-19 lockdown. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(8):1575–1592. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.087

27.

Bozkurt

Jung

Xiao

, et al. A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education. 2020;15(1):1–126.

28.

Brodeur

Cook

Wright

. On the effects of COVID-19 safer-at-home policies on social distancing, car crashes and pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2021;106:102427. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102427

29.

Rosenbaum

. The untold toll—the pandemic’s effects on patients without Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;382(24):2368–2371. doi:10.1056/NEJMms2009984

30.

U.S. Census Bureau. QuickFacts: Cuyahoga County, OH; United States. Accessed May 20, 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/cuyahogacountyohio,US/PST045219