To demonstrate the utilization of virtual surgical planning for surgical splint (VSPSS) fabrication. The VSPSS was used as an intraoperative assisting and guiding tool for reduction and/or fixation of treatment of comminuted maxillomandibular fractures.
Methods:
The presented technical note showed the fabrication process that began with data acquisition and presurgical planning using virtual surgical planning (VSP). The VSPSS was designed and fabricated after the fractures were reduced digitally in VSP. In the operating room, the VSPSS was seated to guide reduction and/or allow satisfactory fixation in three different situations.
Results:
Postoperative radiographs showed an acceptable reduction of the fractures. All patients had stable and repeatable occlusion postoperatively.
Conclusions:
The VSPSS is a feasible tool for surgeons to assist in the comminuted maxillomandibular fracture management, decrease operating time, and improve fracture stability.
PatilRSKaleTPKotrashettiSMBaligaSDPrabhuNIssraniR. Assessment of changing patterns of Le Fort fracture lines using computed tomography scan: an observational study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(8):984–988.
2.
AlpertBTiwanaPSKushnerGM. Management of comminuted fractures of the mandible. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2009;21(2):185–192.
3.
GentileMATellingtonAJBurkeWJJaskolkaMS. Management of midface maxillofacial trauma. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21(1):69–95.
CohenSRLeonardDKMarkowitzBLMansonPN. Acrylic splints for dental alignment in complex facial injuries. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;31(5):406–412.
6.
ChidylloSAJacobsJS. Applications of dental splints with regard to modern techniques of rigid fixation. J Craniofac Surg. 1994;5(2):136–141.
7.
KonasETuncbilekGKayikciogluAAkcanCAKocadereliIMaviliME. Splint-assisted reduction of comminuted or complex maxillofacial fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(4):1471–1475.
8.
BlitzMNotarnicolaK. Closed reduction of the mandibular fracture. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2009;17(1):1–13.
9.
BellRB. Computer planning and intraoperative navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010;22(1):135–156.
10.
LouvrierAMartyPBarrabeA, et al.How useful is 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery?J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;118(4):206–212.
11.
JacobsCALinAY. A new classification of three-dimensional printing technologies: systematic review of three-dimensional printing for patient-specific craniomaxillofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1211–1220.
12.
LevineJPPatelASaadehPBHirschDL. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniomaxillofacial surgery: the new state of the art. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(1):288–293.
13.
GeleskoSMarkiewiczMRBellRB. Responsible and prudent imaging in the diagnosis and management of facial fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013;25(4):545–560.
14.
Castro-NúñezJSheltonJMSnyderSSickelsJV. Virtual surgical planning for the management of severe atrophic mandible fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2018;11(2):150–156.
15.
MorrisonCSTaylorHOCollinsSOyeleseASullivanSR. Use of intraoperative computed tomography in complex craniofacial trauma: an example of on-table change in management. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014;7(4):298–301.
16.
ThorA. Preoperative planning of virtual osteotomies followed by fabrication of patient specific reconstruction plate for secondary correction and fixation of displaced bilateral mandibular body fracture. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016;9(2):188–194.
17.
LiPTangWLiaoCHTanPYZhangJKTianWD. Clinical evaluation of computer-assisted surgical technique in the treatment of comminuted mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2015;27(3):332–336.
18.
MartelliNSerranoCvan den BrinkH, et al.Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2016;159(6):1485–1500.
19.
TepperOMSoriceSHershmanGNSaadehPLevineJPHirschD. Use of virtual 3-dimensional surgery in post-traumatic craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(3):733–741.
20.
WagnerJDBaackBBrownGAKellyJ. Rapid 3-dimensional prototyping for surgical repair of maxillofacial fractures: a technical note. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(7):898–901.
21.
KokosisGDavidsonEHPedreiraRMacmillanADorafsharAH. The use of computer-aided design and manufacturing in acute mandibular trauma reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(5):1036–1043.
22.
SinhaPSkolnickGPatelKBBranhamGHChiJJ. A 3-dimensional-printed short-segment template prototype for mandibular fracture repair. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018;20(5):373–380.
23.
WangHDFrostCCusanoADorafsharAH. Management of bilateral edentulous mandible fractures through an intraoral approach using CAD/CAM technology: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(5):1056.e1–1056.e6.
24.
MaJLMaLMWangZFZhuXJWangWJ. The use of 3D-printed titanium mesh tray in treating complex comminuted mandibular fractures: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(27):1–5.
25.
el-GengehiMSeifSA. Evaluation of the accuracy of computer-guided mandibular fracture reduction. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(5):1587–1591.
26.
KhatibBCuddyKChengA, et al.Functional anatomic computer engineered surgery protocol for the management of self-inflicted gunshot wounds to the maxillofacial skeleton. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(3):580–594.
27.
LeeJ-WChoiB-JNamO-HKwonY-D. Minimal invasive treatment using patient-specific template for mandibular fractures in children: “Wing-splint” by CAD/CAM technology. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(10):1140–1141.
28.
PelegMSawatariY. Management of gunshot wounds to the mandible. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(4):1252–1256.
29.
MearaDJJonesLC. Controversies in maxillofacial trauma. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2017;29(4):391–399.
