Abstract
Recently, several studies have shown that airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) generated in the first 100 milliseconds of inspiration is a useful noninvasive test to predict the outcome of patients weaning from mechanical ventilation. However, to perform the test a breathing circuit, transducers, and recording equipment must be assembled, and data to determine P0.1 must be manually extracted. In this study, we compared P0.1 measurements taken simultaneously by a computerized bedside respiratory cart and a transducer-oscillographic recording system. Studies were performed in 6 healthy subjects. Airway pressure was simultaneously measured by the semi-automated system and a differential pressure transducer, digitized to a computer-based data-acquisition system. Subjects were encouraged to vary breathing pattern to produce a wide range of P0.1 values. The occlusion pressure waveforms collected were independently reviewed and P0.1 visually determined. Seventy-four occlusions were conducted with P0.1 values ranging from 0.3 to 26.2 cm H2O. The semi-automated system rejected 21 occlusions (28%) as being unacceptable. However, the majority of these rejections were due to the operator's arming the occlusion device prematurely. High correlation (r = 0.999) was observed between the P0.1 determined by the semi-automated system and the manual assessment (slope = 0.98, intercept = -0. 18), indicating that the semi-automated system that we studied made accurate determinations of P0.1 over a wide range of breathing patterns. Studies are needed to determine their applicability in measuring P0.1 in the ventilated ICU patient.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
