Benefits Associated with a Respiratory Care Assessment-Treatment Program: Results of a Pilot Study

Abstract

Background

During the months of July, August, and September 1993, we implemented a respiratory care assessment-treatment pilot study on the orthopedic surgery floor in our hospital. The purpose of the study was to determine feasibility and establish cost-effective treatment plans with quality patient outcomes, while maintaining appropriate communications with physicians and nursing staff.

Study Development & Implementation

The study's Task Force developed protocols for oxygen therapy, aerosolized medication therapy, volume expansion therapy, and bronchial hygiene therapy using the American Association for Respiratory Care's Clinical Practice Guidelines as supporting documents. Meetings were held with the orthopedic surgeons and nursing staff to inform them of the key components of the pilot program. Ten patient evaluators were trained to assess patients and implement treatment plans.

Evaluation Methods

A reference book was established that contained the protocols and support material. Patient outcomes were evaluated using previously established quality assurance plans. The length of stay, procedural volume, and cost data were collected.

Evaluation Results

More than 50% of the orders received during the pilot program were for "Respiratory Care Protocol." This allowed the patient care evaluator the flexibility to initiate one of the approved protocols if indicated. No changes in patient outcomes were noted and average length of stay remained unchanged during the pilot study compared to the base period. Treatment volumes decreased, resulting in identified cost savings of $5,318 during the study. Nurses and physicians supported protocol implementation, and increased communication among caregivers was documented. We believe that professionalism of the RCPs was enhanced without compromising the ultimate decision-making responsibilities of the physician.

Conclusions

The use of respiratory care protocols is an acceptable method of developing clinically effective and fiscally responsible care plans. RCPS at our hospital were able to implement care plans that resulted in cost savings without a measured change in patient outcomes. Approval has been extended from the Executive Committee of the medical staff to expand hospital-wide.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mark

, Shrake

. Therapy evaluation protocol as a management technique. Respir Ther 1983;13(Jan-Feb):67–69.

Walton JR , Shapiro

, Harrison

. Review of a bronchial hygiene evaluation program. Respir Care 1983;28(2):174–179.

Zibrak

, Rossetti

, Wood

Effect of reductions in respiratory therapy on patient outcome. N Engl J Med 1986;315(5):292–295.

Hart

, Dubbs

, Gil

, Myers-Judy

The effects of therapist-evaluation of orders and interaction with physicians on the appropriateness of respiratory care. Respir Care 1989;34(3):185–190.

Owens

, Averill

. The role of utilization management under PPS. Healthcare Financial Management 1984;38(10):60–66.

Nielsen-Tietsort

, Poole

, Creagh

, Repsher

. Respiratory care protocol: an approach to in-hospital respiratory therapy. Respir Care 1981;26(5):430–436.

Tietsort

The respiratory care protocol: a management tool for the '90s. AARC Times 1991;15(5):55–62.

Kester

, Stoller

. Ordering respiratory care services for hospitalized patients: practices of overuse and underuse. Cleve Clin J Med 1992;59(6):581–585.

Mahlmeister

, Fink

, Cohen

. A strategy for reducing costs associated with pulse oximetry in noncritical areas. Respir Care 1993;38(9):1005–1013.

10.

Torrington

, Henderson

. Perioperative respiratory therapy (PORT): a program of preoperative risk assessment and individualized postoperative care. Chest 1988;93(5):946–951.

11.

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guidelines: incentive spirometry, pulse oximetry, oxygen therapy in the acute care hospital, spirometry, and postural drainage therapy. Respir Care 1991;36(12):1398–1426.

12.

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guidelines: patient-ventilator system checks, humidification during mechanical ventilation, selection of aerosol delivery device to the lower airways, nasotracheal suctioning, bronchial provocation, exercise testing for evaluation of hypoxemia and/or desaturation, sampling for arterial blood gas analysis, and oxygen therapy in the home or extended care facility. Respir Care 1992;37(8):855–856, 882-922.

13.

American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guidelines: directed cough, in-vitro pH and blood gas analysis and hemoximetry, single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, and use of positive airway pressure adjuncts to bronchial hygiene therapy. Respir Care 1993;38(5):495–499, 505-521.

14.

Burton

, Tietsort

. Therapist driven protocols (TPDs)—a practitioner's guide. Torrance CA: Academy Medical Systems, 1993.

15.

Foster

, Langenback

, Bergofsky

. Respiratory drugs influence lung mucociliary clearance in central and peripheral ciliated airways. Chest 1981;80(6, Suppl):877–880.

16.

Yeates

, Spektor

, Leikauf

, Pitt

. Effects of drugs on mucociliary transport in the trachea and bronchial airways. Chest 1981;80(6, Suppl):870–873.

17.

American College of Chest Physicians, Respiratory Care Section Steering Committee. Respiratory care protocols (position paper). Chicago IL, 1992.

18.

Albin

, Criner

, Thomas

, Abou-Jaoude

Pattern of non-ICU inpatient supplemental oxygen utilization in a university hospital. Chest 1992;102(6):1672–1675.