GlassGV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res1976;5:3–8.
2.
SacksHS, BerrierJ, ReitmanD, Ancona-BerkVA, ChalmersTC. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med1987;316(8):450–455.
3.
OxmanAD, GuyattGH, SingerJ, GoldsmithCH, HutchisonBG, MilnerRA, StreinerDL. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol1991;44(1):91–98.
4.
OxmanAD, GuyattGH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol1991;44(11):1271–1278.
5.
CooperHM. Integrating research: a guide for literature reviews, 2nd ed. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications, 1989.
6.
JacksonGB. Methods for integrative reviews. Rev Educ Res1980;50:438–460.
7.
LightRJ, PillemerDB. Summing up: the science of reviewing research. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
8.
SteinbergKP. Surfactant therapy in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Care1993;38(4):365–372.
9.
American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guidelines. Respir Care1991;36(12):1398–1426.
10.
American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guidelines. Respir Care1992;37(8):882–927.
11.
American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guidelines. Respir Care1993;38(5):495–521.
12.
American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical practice guidelines. Respir Care1993;38(11):1169–1200.
13.
GlassGV, McGawB, SmithML. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills CA: Sage, 1981.
14.
RosenthalR.Meta-analysis: a review. Psychosom Med1991;53(3):247–271.
15.
BrownMS, HellingsP.A case study of qualitative versus quantitative reviews: the maternal-infant bonding controversy. J Pediatr Nurs1988;4:104–111.
16.
ChalmersTC, LevinH, SacksHS, ReitmanD, BerrierJ, NagalingamR.Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. II: replicate variability and comparison of studies that agree and disagree. Stat Med1987;6(7):733–744.
17.
LightRJ, SmithPV. Accumulating evidence: procedures for resolving contradictions among different research studies. Harvard Educ Rev1971;41:429–471.
18.
O'RourkeK, DetskyAS. Meta-analysis in medical research: strong encouragement for higher quality in individual research efforts. J Clin Epidemiol1989;42(10):1021–1024.
HedgesLV, OlkinI.Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1985.
21.
DickersinK, HigginsK, MeinertCL. Identification of meta-analyses: the need for standard terminology. Controlled Clin Trials1990;11(1):52–66.
22.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988:1–17.
23.
HedgesLV, ShymanskyJA, WoodworthG.A practical guide to modern methods of meta-analysis. Washington DC: National Science Teachers Association, 1989.
24.
CookTD, CooperH, CordrayDS, HartmannH, HedgesL, LightRJ, . Meta-analysis for explanation: a casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1992.
25.
BoisselJP, BlanchardJ, PanakE, PeyrieuxJC, SacksH.Considerations for the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: summary of a panel discussion. Controlled Clin Trials1989;10(3):254–281.
26.
AntmanEM, LauJ, KupelnickB, MostellerF, ChalmersTC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts: treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA1992;268(8):240–248.
27.
LauJ, AntmanEM, Jiminez-SilvaJ, KupelnickB, MostellerF, ChalmersTC. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med1992;327(4):248–254.
28.
RosenthalR.Combining results from independent studies. Psychol Bull1978;85:185–193.
29.
OrwinRG. A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. J Educ Stat1983;8:157–159.
30.
CarsonKP, SchriesheimCA, KinickiAJ. The usefulness of the "fail safe" statistic in meta-analysis. Educ Psychol Measurement1990;50:233–243.
31.
MeinertCL. Meta-analysis: science or religion?Controlled Clin Trials1989;10(4, Suppl):257S–263S.
32.
AdamsME, McCallNT, GrayDT, OrzaMJ, ChalmersTC. Economic analysis in randomized control trials. Med Care1992;30(3):231–243.
33.
SmithK, CookD, GuyattGH, MadhavanJ, OxmanAD. Respiratory muscle training in chronic airflow limitation: a meta-analysis. Am Rev Respir Dis1992;145(3):533–539.
34.
FelsonDT. Bias in meta-analytic research. J Clin Epidemiol1992;45(8):885–892.
35.
ChalmersTC, LevinH, SacksHS, ReitmanD, BerrierJ, NagalingamR.Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. I: control of bias and comparison with large co-operative trials. Stat Med1987;6(3):315–328.
36.
CookDJ, GuyattGH, RyanG, CliftonJ, BuckinghamL, WillanA, . Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies. JAMA1993;269(21):2749–2753.
37.
StewartLA, ParmarMKB. Meta-analysis of the literature of individual patient data: is there a difference?Lancet1993;341(8842):418–422.
38.
ClarkRE. Confounding in educational computing research. J Educ Computing Res1985;1:137–148.
39.
Instructions to authors. J Med Educ Tech1992;2:31.
40.
ThompsonSG, PocockSJ. Can meta-analyses be trusted?Lancet1991;338(8775):1127–1130.
41.
BrownSA. Studies of educational interventions and outcomes in diabetic adults: a meta-analysis revisited. Patient Educ Couns1990;16(3):189–215.
42.
BrownSA. Measurement of quality of primary studies for meta-analysis. Nurs Res1991;40(6):352–355.
43.
MullerKE, BenignusVA. Increasing scientific power with statistical power. Neurotoxicol Teratol1992;14(3):211–219.
44.
HennesHM, LeeMB, RimmAA, ShapiroDL. Surfactant replacement therapy in respiratory distress syndrome: meta-analysis of clinical trials of single-dose surfactant extracts. Am J Dis Child1991;145(1):102–104.
45.
HalvorsenKT, BurdickE, ColditzGA, FrazierHS, MostellerF.Combining results from independent investigations: meta-analysis in clinical research. In: BailarJC, MostellerF, eds. Medical uses of statistics, 2nd ed. Boston: NEJM Books, 1993:413–425.
46.
LairdNM, MostellerF.Some statistical methods for combining experimental results. Int J Technol Assess Health Care1990;6(1):5–30.
47.
DerSimonianR, LairdN.Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials1986;7(3):177–188.
48.
ChalmersTC. Problems induced by meta-analyses. Stat Med1991;10(6):971–980.
49.
KraemerHC, PruynJP. The evaluation of different approaches to randomized clinical trials: report on the 1987 MacArthur Foundation Network Methodology Workshop. Arch Gen Psychiatry1990;47(12):1163–1169.
