Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Kacmarek
RM
,
Hess
D.
Pressure-controlled inverse-ratio ventilation: Panacea or auto-PEEP? (editorial) . Respir Care 1990 ;35 :945 –948 .
2.
McCabe
T.
Readers challenge pressure-controlled inverse-ratio ven-tilation editorial: Protocol for imple-mentation . Respir Care 1991 ;36 :122 .
3.
Cravens
K.
Readers challenge pressure-controlled inverse-ratio ven-tilation editorial: More on PCIRV . Respir Care 1991 ;36 :122 –124 .
4.
Lain
D.
Readers challenge pressure-controlled inverse-ratio ventilation editorial: And still more . Respir Care 1991 ;36 :124 –128 .
5.
Adams
AB
,
Burke
WC
. Readers challenge pressure-controlled inverse-ratio ventilation editorial: More than auto-PEEP? Respir Care 1991 ;36 :128 –129 .
6.Siemens Life Support Systems . Part No. 90-10-08 . Siemens , 2360 North Palmer Drive, Schaumburg IL .
7.
Siemens-Elema
. Choice of ventilatory strategy . English , Order No. 9179821 E310E: Siemens-Elema AB , 1987 .
8.
Lain
DC
,
Speir
W.
More on the use of intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (letter) . Crit Care Med 1990 ;18 :1497 .
9.
Smith
TC
,
Marini
JJ
. Impact of PEEP on lung mechanics and work of breathing in severe airflow obstruc-tion . J Appl Physiol 1988 ;65 :1488 –1499 .
10.
Abraham
E
,
Yoshihara
G.
Cardiores-piratory effects of pressure-controlled ventilation in severe respiratory failure . Chest 1990 ;98 :1445 –1449 .