Abstract
Textbook selection is based on a number of criteria, one of which may be reading level. METHOD: We searched the literature to find an appropriate method for reading-level assessment and then evaluated 11 respiratory therapy textbooks for average reading-level and internal reading-level variation by the Luiten, Ames, Bradley Variation Method (LAB), which is based on the Fry Readability Model. The LAB is a validated method that employs 12 100-word samples from each book evaluated. We counted syllables and sentences in each sample, computed the mean and standard deviation (SD) of each, multiplied SD by a constant based on t distribution values, and plotted a zone that allows prediction of the average reading level and the internal variation in reading level of 80% of the book. RESULTS: Nine of the books had an average reading level of Grade 17, one was at Grade 16, and one at Grade 14. All books had internal grade-level variations, of as little as 2 years to as much as 10 years. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that some respiratory therapy textbooks in common use are written at a high grade level and have marked grade-level variability within the text. Students may have difficulty comprehending the content of textbooks written at a level beyond their ability. Comprehension may be improved if students are required to master terminology prior to respiratory therapy classwork and if they are required to outline and/or rewrite reading assignments. Authors who are writing introductory texts should use shorter sentences and simpler language wherever possible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.