Confusion may result when the same or similar absolute values for pulmonary function tests on a given patient are compared to various 'normal' or predicted values. We describe a computer program that allows comparison of predicted normal values for seven pulmonary function tests calculated by five combinations of commonly used regression equations. In addition, other regression equations can be substituted. Interested readers can obtain a copy of the program from the authors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SniderGL, KoryRC, LyonsHA. Grading of pulmonary function impairment by means of pulmonary function tests. Recommendations of the Committee on Pulmonary Physiology, American College of Chest Physicians. Dis Chest1967;52:270.
2.
ATS statement, Evaluation of impairment/disability secondary to respiratory disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;126:945–951.
3.
ATS statement, Snowbird workshop on standardization of spirometry. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979;119:831–838.
4.
PennockBE, RogersRM, McCaffreeDR. Changes in measured spirometric indices: What is significant?Chest1981;80:97–99.
5.
SorensenJB, MorrisAH, CrapoRO, GardnerRM. Selection of the best spirometric values for interpretation. Am Rev Respir Dis1980;122:802–805.
6.
MorrisJF. Spirometry in the evaluation of pulmonary function: Medical progress. West J Med1976;125:110–118.
7.
GoldmanHI, BecklakeMR. Respiratory function tests—Normal values at median altitudes and the prediction of normal results. Am Rev Tuberc1959;79:457–467.
8.
BurrowsB, KasikJE. Clinical usefulness of the single-breath pulmonary diffusion capacity test. Am Rev Respir Dis1961;84:789–806.
9.
BriscoeWA, DuBoisAG. The relationship between airway resistance, airway conductance, and lung volume in subjects of different age and body size. J Clin Invest1959;37:1279–1285.
10.
KoryRC, CallahanR, BorenHG, SynerJC. The veterans administration-army cooperative study of pulmonary function. I. Clinical spirometry in normal men. Am J Med1961;30:243–258.
11.
BorenHG, KoryRC, SynerJ C. The veterans administration-army cooperative study of pulmonary function. II. The lung volume and its subdivisions in normal man. Am J Med1966;41:96–114.
12.
CrapoRO, MorrisAH, GardnerRM. Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment and meet ATS recommendations. Am Rev Respir Dis1981;123:659–664.
CrapoRO, MorrisAH. Standardized single breath normal values for carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. Am Rev Respir Dis1981;123:185–189.
15.
QuanjerPH. Standardization of lung function testing. Report of Working Party "Standardization of lung function tests," European Community for Coal and Steel. Bull Europ Physiopath Resp1983;(suppl).
16.
SchmidtCD, DickmanWL, GardnerRM, BroughFK. Spirometric standards for healthy elderly men and women. Am Rev Respir Dis1973;108:933–939.
17.
DaCostaJL. Pulmonary function studies in healthy Chinese adults in Singapore. Am Rev Respir Dis1971;104:128–131.
18.
FerrisBG, AndersonDO, ZickmantelR.Prediction values for screening tests of pulmonary function. Am Rev Respir Dis1965;91:252–261.
19.
LappNL, AmandusHE, HallR, MorganWKC. Lung volumes and flow rates in black and white subjects. Thorax1984;29:185–188.
20.
SchoenbergJB, BeckGJ, BouhuysA.Growth and decay of pulmonary function in healthy blacks and whites. Respir Physiol1978;33:367–393.
21.
ClausenJL. Prediction of normal values. In: Pulmonary function testing guidelines and controversies (Chapter 6). New York: Academic Press1982.
DuBoisD, DuBoisEF. Clinical calorimetry: A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight are known. Arch Intern Med1916;17:863–871.
25.
PetriniMF. Pulmonary function testing: Custom programs for manual equipment. Comput Biol Med1984;14:59–62.
