Letters on topics of current interest or commenting on material in RESPIRATORY CARE will be considered for publication. The Editor may accept or decline a letter or edit it without changing the author's views. Authors of criticized material will have the opportunity to reply in print. No anonymous letters can be published. Type letter double-spaced, mark it "For publication,'' and mail to RESPIRATORY CARE, Box 426, Cheshire CT 06410.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SilageDA, MaxwellC.A spirometry/interpretation program for hand-held computers. Respir Care1983;28:62–66.
2.
ClausenJL. Prediction of normal values. In: ClausenJL, ed. Pulmonary function testing guidelines and controversies. New York: Academic Press, 1982:49–59.
3.
WatanabeS, RenzettiADJr, BeginR, BiglerAH. Airway responsiveness to a bronchodilator aerosol. I. Normal human subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis1974;109:530–537.
4.
NewballHH. The unreliability of the maximal midexpiratory flow as an index of acute airway changes. Chest1975;67:311–314.
5.
BoggsPB, BhatKD, VekoviusWA, DeboMS. Volume-adjusted maximal mid-expiratory flow (iso-volume FEF25-75%): Definition of "significant" responsiveness in healthy, normal subjects. Ann Allergy1982;48:137–138.
6.
MorrisJF, KoskiA, JohnsonLC. Spirometric standards for healthy non-smoking adults. Am Rev Respir Dis1971;103:57–67.
7.
BousheyHA, DawsonA.Spirometry and flow-volume curves. In: ClausenJL, ed. Pulmonary function testing guidelines and controversies. New York: Academic Press, 1982:61–82.
