LinN, FanCJ, LiFY, et al.Research trends and hotspots in the field of electrical impedance tomography for mechanical ventilation: A bibliometric analysis. J Thorac Dis2024; 16: 2070–2081; doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-98
2.
BarberD and BrownB. Recent developments in applied potential tomography-APT. In: Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Springer, 1986.
3.
HarrisND, SuggettAJ, BarberDC, et al.Applied potential tomography: A new technique for monitoring pulmonary function. Clin Phys Physiol Meas1988; 9 Suppl A: 79–85; doi: 10.1088/0143-0815/9/4a/014
4.
VictorinoJA, BorgesJB, OkamotoVN, et al.Imbalances in regional lung ventilation: A validation study on electrical impedance tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2004; 169: 791–800; doi: 10.1164/rccm.200301-133OC
5.
MeierT, LeibeckeT, EckmannC, et al.Electrical impedance tomography: Changes in distribution of pulmonary ventilation during laparoscopic surgery in a porcine model. Langenbecks Arch Surg2006; 391: 383–389; doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0034-8
6.
MeierT, LuepschenH, KarstenJ, et al.Assessment of regional lung recruitment and derecruitment during a PEEP trial based on electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med2008; 34: 543–550; doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0786-9
7.
WriggeH, ZinserlingJ, MudersT, et al.Electrical impedance tomography compared with thoracic computed tomography during a slow inflation maneuver in experimental models of lung injury. Crit Care Med2008; 36: 903–909; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181652EDD
8.
MoraisCCA, RattesC, RochaT, et al.Electrical impedance tomography accurately reflects regional ventilation distribution compared to computed tomography in non-intubated subjects. Respir Care2026.
9.
KarstenJ, StueberT, VoigtN, et al.Influence of different electrode belt positions on electrical impedance tomography imaging of regional ventilation: A prospective observational study. Crit Care2016; 20: 3; doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1161-9
10.
MarquisF, CoulombeN, CostaR, et al.Electrical impedance tomography’s correlation to lung volume is not influenced by anthropometric parameters. J Clin Monit Comput2006; 20: 201–207; doi: 10.1007/s10877-006-9021-4
11.
JonkmanAH, AlcalaGC, PavlovskyB, Pleural Pressure Working Group (PLUG). et al.Lung recruitment assessed by electrical impedance tomography (RECRUIT): A multicenter study of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2023; 208: 25–38; doi: 10.1164/rccm.202212-2300OC
12.
PhoophiboonV, RodriguesA, VieiraF, et al.Ventilation distribution during spontaneous breathing trials predicts liberation from mechanical ventilation: The VISION study. Crit Care2025; 29: 11; doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05243-0
13.
MoraisCCA, AlcalaG, De Santis SantiagoRR, et al.Pronation reveals a heterogeneous response of global and regional respiratory mechanics in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Crit Care Explor2023; 5: e0983; doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000983
14.
SerranoRE, deLB, CasasO, et al.Use of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) for the assessment of unilateral pulmonary function. Physiol Meas2002; 23: 211–220; doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/23/1/322
15.
SmitHJ, Vonk-NoordegraafA, MarcusJT, et al.Pulmonary vascular responses to hypoxia and hyperoxia in healthy volunteers and COPD patients measured by electrical impedance tomography. Chest2003; 123: 1803–1809; doi: 10.1378/chest.123.6.1803
16.
VogtB, PulletzS, ElkeG, et al.Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of regional lung ventilation determined by electrical impedance tomography during pulmonary function testing. J Appl Physiol (1985)2012; 113: 1154–1161; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01630.2011
