Abstract
Background:
Respiratory secretions are a common complication in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, yet no validated tool is available to classify secretion type and amount in this setting.
Methods:
We conducted a prospective study in 2 mixed ICUs in southern Brazil (January 2022–January 2024). Adult patients intubated for >24 h and requiring suctioning were eligible. Secretions were collected during routine suctioning, photographed, and classified using the newly developed Respiratory Secretion Scale (RESES). The scale categorizes secretions into 7 types (mucoid, mucopurulent-1, mucopurulent-2, purulent, bloody-mucoid, bloody, bloody-purulent) and 3 amounts (small, medium, large). Inter-observer reliability was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa. Associations between secretion characteristics and clinical variables were analyzed using chi-square, t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, and multinomial logistic regression.
Results:
Among 70 subjects included in the validation phase, inter-observer agreement was excellent (kappa type = 0.87; amount = 0.85; combined = 0.82). In 398 subjects analyzed for clinical associations, purulent and bloody-mucoid secretions were more frequent among nonsurvivors, whereas mucoid secretions predominated among survivors (P = .03). Large secretion amounts were associated with respiratory disease, pulmonary infection focus, and longer duration of mechanical ventilation (all P < .05). In the multinomial logistic regression, the diagnosis and the pulmonary infection focus remained significantly associated with both secretion type (Relative Risks [RR] = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.05–1.56, P = .02; RR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.12–2.14, P = .008, respectively) and amount (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.08–2.44, P < .02; RR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.09–2.68, P = .02, respectively), although chest imaging with consolidation was associated only with secretion amount (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.09, P < .007).
Conclusions:
The RESES is a simple, visual tool that standardized secretion assessment in mechanically ventilated subjects, improving clinical communication and providing a foundation for future research.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
