GuazzoniG, CestariA, NasproR, et al.Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol, 2006; 50(1):98–104; doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.02.051
2.
YuH, HeveloneND, LipsitzSR, et al.Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol, 2012; 187(4):1392–1398; doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.089
3.
GriecoDL, AnzellottiGM, RussoA, et al.Airway closure during surgical pneumoperitoneum in obese patients. Anesthesiology, 2019; 131(1):58–73; doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002662
4.
HedenstiernaG. Complete airway closure: where, why, and with what consequences? Anesthesiology, 2020; 133(4):705–707; doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003479
5.
AnderssonLE, BååthM, ThörneA, et al.Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on development of atelectasis during anesthesia, examined by spiral computed tomography. Anesthesiology, 2005; 102(2):293–299; doi: 10.1097/00000542-200502000-00009
6.
ChiumelloD, CoppolaS, FrattiI, et al.Ventilation strategy during urological and gynaecological robotic-assisted surgery: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth, 2023; 131(4):764–774; doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.06.066
7.
BaydurA, BehrakisPK, ZinWA, et al.A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1982; 126(5):788–791; doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.5.788
8.
BrandãoJC, LessaMA, Motta-RibeiroG, et al.Global and regional respiratory mechanics during robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a randomized study. Anesth Analg, 2019; 129(6):1564–1573; doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004289
9.
ShonoA, KatayamaN, FujiharaT, et al.Positive end-expiratory pressure and distribution of ventilation in pneumoperitoneum combined with steep Trendelenburg position. Anesthesiology, 2020; 132(3):476–490; doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003062
10.
EdgintonS, KrugerN, StelfoxHT, et al.Methods for determining optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation: a scoping review. Can J Anaesth, 2024; 71(11):1535–1555; doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02871-6
11.
MazzinariG, ZampieriFG, BallL, et al.; for REPEAT on behalf of the PROVHILO, iPROVE, and PROBESE investigators and the PROVE Network investigators. High positive end-expiratory pressure with recruitment maneuvers versus low PEEP during general anesthesia for surgery: a Bayesian individual patient data meta-analysis of three randomized clinical trials. Anesthesiology, 2025; 142(1):72–97; doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005170
12.
LoringSH, BehazinN, NoveroA, et al.Respiratory mechanical effects of surgical pneumoperitoneum in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2014; 117(9):1074–1079; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00552.2014
13.
MaX, FuY, PiaoX, et al.Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure titrated intra-operatively by electrical impedance tomography optimises pulmonary mechanics and reduces postoperative atelectasis: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2023; 40(11):805–816; doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001901
14.
BrandtCM, BorgmannS, FrankN, et al.Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy guided by intratidal compliance–volume curve analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2025; 69(6):e70067; doi: 10.1111/aas.70067
15.
TharpWG, MurphyS, BreidensteinMW, et al.Body habitus and dynamic surgical conditions independently impair pulmonary mechanics during robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Anesthesiology, 2020; 133(4):750–763; doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003442
