Abstract
Background:
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy was originally considered only for its targeted O2 delivery but has been shown to also assist in the removal of end-expiratory CO2. Variables that influence the capability of this modality to reduce end-expiratory CO2 are being proposed and investigated. Two types of HFNC therapy were precisely modeled at numerous mouth openings to investigate the effect that mouth open percent (MOP) had on airway CO2 reduction (flush) and upper airway pressure generation for each therapy.
Methods:
Computational fluid dynamics models were run at MOPs of 0%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 100%, and each was administered therapy via a large-bore cannula, small-bore cannula, or no therapy. All models were initially run with less accurate, but cheaper, modeling parameters to establish the range of MOPs to be tested with higher-accuracy modeling parameters. Higher-accuracy models were run for MOPs of 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 100%. CO2 and pressure in the upper airway were analyzed to provide information on the effect of MOP, therapy type, and therapy flow.
Results:
The distinction between cannulas peaked at an MOP of 20%, with large-bore having ∼3.5 mg more CO2 entrained at end-exhale than small-bore. Increasing MOP and increasing therapy flow each decreased CO2 retention in the airway. Therapy with a large-bore cannula resulted in less CO2 flush than with a small-bore cannula, if all other factors were identical. Decreasing MOP and increasing therapy flow each increased distending pressure generation, while small-bore generated higher pressures than large-bore when all other factors were the same.
Conclusions:
The results collected using the lower-cost models highlighted the necessity of high-accuracy modeling methodology. The CO2 and pressure results from the higher-accuracy models can inform clinicians as to the benefits of certain HFNC modalities at intermediate mouth openings (pursed-lip breathing).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
