It has been understudied whether and how sociocultural contexts moderate the relationship between nature connectedness and adolescents’ subjective well-being. This study addresses the gap by examining the moderating role of household natural resource dependence (HNRD). We conducted a survey in Tibet, China (N = 8766) and found that the association between nature connectedness and subjective well-being was weaker among adolescents with high (than low) HNRD. Mediated moderation analyses showed that higher HNRD predicted stronger gratitude to nature, which, in turn, predicted a weaker association between nature connectedness and subjective well-being. The findings were consistent across both subjective and objective measures of HNRD and different indicators of subjective well-being (i.e., happiness, life satisfaction, and psychological richness). These findings shed light on the importance of investigating the role of sociocultural contexts in shaping the relationship between nature connectedness and subjective well-being among adolescents.
Abdel-KhalekA. M. (2006). Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34, 139–150; doi: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.139
2.
Aguirre-UrretaM. I., & HuJ. (2019). Detecting common method bias: Performance of the Harman’s single-factor test. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 50, 45–70; doi: 10.1145/3330472.3330477
3.
AhmedZ., AsgharM. M., MalikM. N., & NawazK. (2020). Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resources Policy, 67, 101677; doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677
4.
AllenM. S., IliescuD., & GreiffS. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38, 1–5; doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000699
5.
ArolaT., AulakeM., OttA., LindholmM., KouvonenP., … VirtanenP., R. (2023). The impacts of nature connectedness on children’s well-being: Systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85, 101913; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101913
6.
Bakir-DemirT., BerumentS. K., & AkkayaS. (2021). Nature connectedness boosts the bright side of emotion regulation, which in turn reduces stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 101642; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101642
7.
BangsboE. (2008). Schooling for knowledge and cultural survival: Tibetan community schools in nomadic herding areas. Educational Review, 60, 69–84; doi: 10.1080/00131910701794598
8.
BarrableA., FriedmanS., TamK.-P., & Papadatou-PastouM. (2024). Nature connection and wellbeing in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Environmental Psychology. Advance online publication. https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/13788
9.
BeeryT., Stahl OlafssonA., GentinS., MaurerM., StålhammarS., AlbertC., … RaymondC. M. (2023). Disconnection from nature: Expanding our understanding of human–nature relations. People and Nature, 5, 470–488; doi: 10.1002/pan3.10451
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In HusenT & PostlethwaiteT. N.(Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 1643–1647). Pergamon/Elsevier.
11.
CheungF., & LucasR. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 23, 2809–2818; doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4
12.
ClaytonS. (2024). A social psychology of climate change: Progress and promise. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 63, 1535–1546; doi: 10.1111/bjso.12749
13.
ColladoS., StaatsH., & SorrelM. A. (2016). Helping out on the land: Effects of children’s role in agriculture on reported psychological restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 201–209; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.005
14.
CuiW., & YangZ. (2022). Association between connection to nature and children’s happiness in China: Children’s negative affectivity and gender as moderators. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23, 47–63; doi: 10.1007/s10902-021-00386-1
15.
CulbertsonS. S., FullagarC. J., & MillsM. J. (2010). Feeling good and doing great: The relationship between psychological capital and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 421–433; doi: 10.1037/a0020720
16.
DongX., & GengL. (2025). Connection with nature and adolescents’ life satisfaction: The role of cognitive reappraisal and affect. Ecopsychology, 17, 79–90; doi: 10.1089/eco.2024.0026
17.
DonnellyG. E., ZhengT., HaisleyE., & NortonM. I. (2018). The amount and source of millionaires’ wealth (moderately) predict their happiness. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 684–699; doi: 10.1177/0146167217744766
18.
DouB., XuJ., SongZ., FengW., & LiuW. (2024). Natural resource dependence and household adaptive capacity: Understanding the linkages in the context of disaster resettlement. Sustainability, 16, 7915; doi: 10.3390/su16187915
19.
EdwardsR. C., LarsonB. M., & ClaytonS. (2024). Navigating eco-anxiety and eco-detachment: Educators’ strategies for raising environmental awareness given students’ disconnection from nature. Environmental Education Research, 30, 864–880; doi: 10.1080/13504622.2023.2286929
20.
EomK., SaadC. S., & KimH. S. (2021). Religiosity moderates the link between environmental beliefs and pro-environmental support: The role of belief in a controlling god. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 891–905; doi: 10.1177/0146167220948712
21.
GyalH. (2019). “I am concerned with the future of my children”: The project economy and shifting views of education in a Tibetan pastoral community. Critical Asian Studies, 51, 12–30; doi: 10.1080/14672715.2018.1544500
22.
HartigT., KorpelaK., EvansG. W., & GärlingT. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14, 175–194; doi: 10.1080/02815739708730435
23.
JacksonS. B., StevensonK. T., LarsonL. R., PetersonM. N., & SeekampE. (2021). Connection to nature boosts adolescents’ mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13, 12297; doi: 10.3390/su132112297
24.
KaplanR., & KaplanS. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press. [Database].
25.
KwanJ. L. Y., & ChanW. (2018). Variable system: An alternative approach for the analysis of mediated moderation. Psychological Methods, 23, 262–277; doi: 10.1037/met0000160.supp
26.
LarsonL. R., SzczytkoR., BowersE. P., StephensL. E., StevensonK. T., & FloydM. F. (2019). Outdoor time, screen time, and connection to nature: Troubling trends among rural youth? Environment and Behavior, 51, 966–991; doi: 10.1177/0013916518806686
27.
LiW. Q., & LiL. M. W. (2025). Resource curse or resource blessing? A moderated mediation model of the relationship between natural resource dependence and proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 510, 145651; doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145651
28.
LiuH., NongH., RenH., & LiuK. (2022). The effect of nature exposure, nature connectedness on mental well-being and ill-being in a general Chinese population. Landscape and Urban Planning, 222, 104397; doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104397
29.
LiuW., & WuX. (2023). Poverty alleviation resettlement and household natural resources dependence: A case study from Ankang Prefecture, China. Agriculture, 13, 1034; doi: 10.3390/agriculture13051034
30.
LiuW., HeL., XuJ., & XuD. (2023). Linking natural resource dependence to sustainable household wellbeing: A case study in Western China. Agriculture, 13, 1935; doi: 10.3390/agriculture13101935
31.
LuoG. L., & ZhangX. (2012). Universalization of access to modern energy services in Tibetan rural households—Renewable energy’s exploitation, utilization, and policy analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 2373–2380; doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.050
32.
MaderaF., OlceseM., CardinaliP., & MiglioriniL. (2025). Nature connectedness in adolescents and young adults: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 107, 102761; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102761
33.
MaesM. J., PiraniM., BoothE. R., ShenC., MilliganB., … JonesK. E., M. B. (2021). Benefit of woodland and other natural environments for adolescents’ cognition and mental health. Nature Sustainability, 4, 851–858; doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00751-1
34.
MayerF., & FrantzC. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
35.
NaeimiH., SissonN. M., LeonhardtN. D., KimY. H., & ImpettE. A. (2025). Analysis of latent profiles of gratitude, indebtedness, and religiosity among individuals in romantic relationships in the United States, Canada, and South Korea. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1–12; doi: 10.1080/17439760.2025.2569081
36.
NelsonJ. M., TsangJ. A., & SchnitkerS. A. (2024). Gratitude: From relational emotion to contextualized virtue inclusive of indebtedness. In MatthewsM. D & LernerR. M.(Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Character Development (Vol. 1, pp. 459–487). Routledge; doi: 10.4324/9781003251248
37.
NgJ. C., CheungV. W., & LauV. C. (2019). Unpacking the differential effects of dispositional envy on happiness among adolescents and young adults: The mediated moderation role of self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 244–249; doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.011
38.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & MurphyS. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740; doi: 10.1177/0013916508318748
39.
OishiS., ChaY., & ChoiH. (2025). Gratitude, indebtedness, and God: Gratitude and indebtedness to God are more strongly correlated to each other than gratitude and indebtedness to a person or an object. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 20, 432–452; doi: 10.1080/17439760.2024.2378707
40.
OishiS., ChoiH., ButtrickN., HeintzelmanS. J., KushlevK., WestgateE. C., … BesserL. L. (2019). The psychologically rich life questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 257–270; doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.06.010
OishiS., KooM., LimN., & SuhE. M. (2019). When gratitude evokes indebtedness. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 11, 286–303; doi: 10.1111/aphw.12155
43.
PannoA., TheodorouA., CarrusG., ImperatoriC., SpanoG., & SanesiG. (2020). Nature reappraisers, benefits for the environment: A model linking cognitive reappraisal, the “being away” dimension of restorativeness and eco-friendly behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1986; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01986
44.
PassmoreH. A., LumberR., NiemiecR., & SofenL. I. (2025). Creating kinship with nature and boosting well-being: Testing two novel character strengths-based nature connectedness interventions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 26, 71; doi: 10.1007/s10902-025-00900-9
45.
PassmoreH. A., YangY., & SabineS. (2022). An extended replication study of the well-being intervention, the noticing nature intervention (NNI). Journal of Happiness Studies, 23, 2663–2683; doi: 10.1007/s10902-022-00516-3
46.
PiccininniC., MichaelsonV., JanssenI., & PickettW. (2018). Outdoor play and nature connectedness as potential correlates of internalized mental health symptoms among Canadian adolescents. Preventive Medicine, 112, 168–175; doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.020
PritchardA., RichardsonM., SheffieldD., & McEwanK. (2020). The relationship between nature connectedness and Eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 1145–1167; doi: 10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6
49.
R Core Team. (2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
50.
RheeJ. H., SchermerB., & LeeK. H. (2024). Effects of the nature connectedness on restoration in simulated indoor natural environments. Building and Environment, 258, 111601; doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111601
51.
RighettiF., SchneiderI., FerrierD., SpiridonovaT., XiangR., & ImpettE. A. (2020). The bittersweet taste of sacrifice: Consequences for ambivalence and mixed reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 149, 1950–1968; doi: 10.1037/xge0000750
52.
SchultzP. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In SchmuckP & SchultzW. P.(Eds.), Psychology of Sustainable Development (pp. 62–78). Kluwer; doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4
53.
TamK. P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004
54.
TamK. P. (2022). Gratitude to nature: Presenting a theory of its conceptualization, measurement, and effects on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101754; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101754
55.
TamK. P., & MilfontT. L. (2020). Towards cross-cultural environmental psychology: A state-of-the-art review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101474; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101474
56.
UhlmannK., RossH., BuckleyL., & LinB. B. (2022). Nature relatedness, connections to food and wellbeing in Australian adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101888; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101888
57.
UlrichR. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. Behavior and the Natural Environment, 6, 85–125; doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4
58.
VishkinA., KimM. Y., SolakN., SzymaniakK., WhiteC. J. M., & KitayamaS. (2025). Cultural variation in the motivational correlates of gratitude. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 25, 114–125; doi: 10.1037/emo0001425
59.
WangC., TangZ., & NanZ. (2018). The caterpillar fungus boom on the Tibetan Plateau: Curse or blessing? China Economic Review, 47, 65–76; doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2017.12.003
60.
WangY., WenZ., WangH., & GuanF. (2022). The second type of mediated moderation. Advances in Psychological Science, 30, 2131–2142; doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02131
WuJ., PengC., ZhouD., & JiangG. (2023). Pastoral household natural resource dependence and contributions of grassland to livelihoods: A case study from the Tibetan Plateau in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 402, 136751; doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136751
63.
XiangZ., LuoX., ZhengR., JiangQ., ZhuK., FengY., … SongR. (2022). Associations of greenness surrounding schools and self-reported depressive and anxiety symptoms in Chinese adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders, 318, 62–69; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.095
64.
YukiM., SatoK., TakemuraK., & OishiS. (2013). Social ecology moderates the association between self-esteem and happiness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 741–746; doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.006
65.
ZhangD. C., HowardG., MatthewsR. A., & CowleyT. (2023). Eliciting risk preferences: Is a single item enough? Journal of Risk Research, 26, 1422–1438; doi: 10.1080/13669877.2023.2288016
66.
ZhouM., LuoY., XuZ., ZhangR., & LiuX. (2025). Nature exposure and subjective well-being: The mediating roles of connectedness to nature and awe. Sustainability, 17, 5406; doi: 10.3390/su17125406
67.
ZouH., LiS., ZouH., SunW., NiuY., & YuC. (2022). Livelihood sustainability of herder households in North Tibet, China. Sustainability, 14, 5166; doi: 10.3390/su14095166
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
