Immersion in natural environments supports health and well-being; yet, research in this domain often does not adequately reflect the experiences of diverse communities. Given the ways in which individuals’ identities and cultural backgrounds influence human–nature relationships, it is imperative to explore and document these dynamics. This study furthers this aim by amplifying the nature-based perspectives of Black men in the United States who completed a multiday outdoor retreat program led by the nonprofit organization Boyz N The Wood. This collaborative study uses a participatory mental modeling approach to ascertain the types of impacts the retreat had on participants and which activities and broader characteristics of the program facilitated those impacts. Thematic analysis of 19 mental modeling interviews revealed six impact types and three nature-based activity categories that gave rise to the identified impacts. We also identified a series of enabling and constraining characteristics that influenced the extent to which exposure to nature might influence the health and well-being of participants. We discuss these findings in depth and share the implications for both research and practice in the field of nature, health, and well-being.
Abo‐ZenaM. M., JonesK., & MattisJ. (2022). Dismantling the master’s house: Decolonizing “Rigor” in psychological scholarship. Journal of Social Issues, 78, 298–319; doi: 10.1111/josi.12519
2.
AdamsG., DoblesI., GómezL. H., KurtişT., & MolinaL. E. (2015). Decolonizing psychological science: Introduction to the special thematic section. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3, 213–238; doi: 10.5964/jspp.v3i1.564
3.
AnderssonS., AhlerJ. R., TangL. H., AagaardT. V., SkouS. T., & SimonÿC. (2024). “I prefer high-intensity exercise”—A qualitative study of men’s experiences with a nature-based exercise program for people with arthritis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21, 1606; doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121606
4.
ArbuthnottK. D. (2023). Nature exposure and social health: Prosocial behavior, social cohesion, and effect pathways. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 90, 102109; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102109
5.
ArolaT., AulakeM., OttA., LindholmM., KouvonenP., VirtanenP., & PaloniemiR. (2023). The impacts of nature connectedness on children’s well-being: Systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85, 101913; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101913
6.
BakerM., CarrN., & StewartE. (2022). Introduction to special issue on being outdoors: Challenging and celebrating diverse outdoor leisure embodiments and experiences. Annals of Leisure Research, 25, 305–313; doi: 10.1080/11745398.2022.2089181
7.
BallewM. T., & OmotoA. M. (2018). Absorption: How nature experiences promote awe and other positive emotions. Ecopsychology, 10, 26–35; doi: 10.1089/eco.2017.0044
8.
Barragan-JasonG., de MazancourtC., ParmesanC., SingerM. C., & LoreauM. (2022). Human–nature connectedness as a pathway to sustainability: A global meta-analysis. Conservation Letters, 15, e12852; doi: 10.1111/conl.12852
9.
Barragan-JasonG., LoreauM., de MazancourtC., SingerM. C., & ParmesanC. (2023). Psychological and physical connections with nature improve both human well-being and nature conservation: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Biological Conservation, 277, 109842; doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109842
10.
BiggsD., AbelN., KnightA. T., LeitchA., LangstonA., & BanN. C. (2011). The implementation crisis in conservation planning: Could “mental models” help?: Mental models in conservation planning. Conservation Letters, 4, 169–183; doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00170.x
11.
BlumE. D. (2002). Power, danger, and control: Slave women’s perceptions of wilderness in the nineteenth century. Women’s Studies, 31, 247–265; doi: 10.1080/00497870212952
12.
BradyL. M., FrybergS. A., & ShodaY. (2018). Expanding the interpretive power of psychological science by attending to culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 11406–11413; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803526115
13.
BratmanG. N., AndersonC. B., BermanM. G., CochranB., de VriesS., FlandersJ., … DailyG. C. (2019). Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances, 5, eaax0903; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0903
14.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101; doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
15.
ChambersR. (2009). So that the poor count more: Using participatory methods for impact evaluation. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1, 243–246; doi: 10.1080/19439340903137199
16.
Charles-RodriguezU., AborawiA., KhatiwadaK., ShahiA., KosoS., ProciwS., … LaroucheR. (2023). Hands-on-ground in a new country: A community-based participatory evaluation with immigrant communities in Southern Alberta. Global Health Promotion, 30, 25–34; doi: 10.1177/17579759231176293
17.
ChawlaL. (2015). Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30, 433–452; doi: 10.1177/0885412215595441
18.
ChawlaL. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People and Nature, 2, 619–642; doi: 10.1002/pan3.10128
19.
ChristensB. D., McCormickM. L., & WolfJ. (2025). Understanding and promoting nature connectedness: A human ecological perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 65, 102046; doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102046
20.
ClearyA., FieldingK. S., BellS. L., MurrayZ., & RoikoA. (2017). Exploring potential mechanisms involved in the relationship between Eudaimonic well-being and nature connection. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 119–128; doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.003
21.
DeanJ. H., ShanahanD. F., BushR., GastonK. J., LinB. B., BarberE., … FullerR. A. (2018). Is nature relatedness associated with better mental and physical health? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, Article 7; doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071371
22.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Vol. 1), pp. 416–436. Sage Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781446249215.n21
23.
EricksonB., JohnsonC. W., & KivelB. D. (2009). Rocky mountain national park: History and culture as factors in African-American Park visitation. Journal of Leisure Research, 41, 529–545; doi: 10.1080/00222216.2009.11950189
24.
Escalera-ReyesJ. (2020). Place attachment, feeling of belonging and collective identity in socio-ecological systems: Study case of Pegalajar (Andalusia-Spain). Sustainability, 12, 3388; doi: 10.3390/su12083388
25.
FerneeC. R., GabrielsenL. E., AndersenA. J. W., & MeselT. (2017). Unpacking the black box of wilderness therapy: A realist synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 27, 114–129; doi: 10.1177/1049732316655776
26.
FieldingK. S., & HornseyM. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 121; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121
27.
FinneyC. (2014). Black Faces, White Spaces: Reimagining the Relationship of African Americans to the Great Outdoors. UNC Press Books.
28.
Gallegos-RiofríoC. A., ArabH., Carrasco-TorronteguiA., & GouldR. K. (2022). Chronic deficiency of diversity and pluralism in research on nature’s mental health effects: A planetary health problem. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100148; doi: 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100148
29.
GlaveD. D. (2010). Rooted in the Earth: Reclaiming the African American Environmental Heritage. Chicago Review Press.
30.
GoldyS. P., & PiffP. K. (2020). Toward a social ecology of prosociality: Why, when, and where nature enhances social connection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 27–31; doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.016
Hansen-KetchumP. A., MarckP., ReutterL., & HalpennyE. (2011). Strengthening access to restorative places: Findings from a participatory study on engaging with nature in the promotion of health. Health & Place, 17, 558–571; doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.014
33.
HatalaA. R., NjezeC., MortonD., PearlT., & Bird-NaytowhowK. (2020). Land and nature as sources of health and resilience among Indigenous youth in an urban Canadian context: A photovoice exploration. BMC Public Health, 20, 538; doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08647-z
34.
HenrichJ., HeineS. J., & NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83; doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
35.
HøegmarkS., AndersenT. E., GrahnP., MejldalA., & RoesslerK. K. (2021). The Wildman Programme—Rehabilitation and reconnection with nature for men with mental or physical health problems—A matched-control study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 11465; doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111465
36.
HooksB. (2002). Earthbound on solid ground. DemingAH and SavoyLE. (eds), The Colors of Nature: Culture, Identity, and the Natural World (pp. 67–71). Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.
37.
JimenezM. P., DeVilleN. V., ElliottE. G., SchiffJ. E., WiltG. E., HartJ. E., & JamesP. (2021). Associations between nature exposure and health: A review of the evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, Article 9; doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094790
38.
JohnsonC. Y., & BowkerJ. M. & Center for Environmental Philosophy, The University of North Texas. (2004). African-American wildland memories. Environmental Ethics, 26, 57–75; doi: 10.5840/enviroethics200426141
39.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182; doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
40.
KephartL. (2022). How racial residential segregation structures access and exposure to greenness and green space: A review. Environmental Justice, 15, 204–213; doi: 10.1089/env.2021.0039
41.
KindonS, PainR, & KesbyM. (Eds.). (2007). Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203933671
42.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.
43.
Krumrei MancusoE. J., TrammellJ., & HarrigerJ. (2024). Affective, cognitive, and environmental inductions of humility and intellectual humility that center on self-transcendence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 19, 947–965; doi: 10.1080/17439760.2023.2257680
44.
KrymkowskiD. H., ManningR. E., & ValliereW. A. (2014). Race, ethnicity, and visitation to national parks in the United States: Tests of the marginality, discrimination, and subculture hypotheses with national-level survey data. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 7-8, 35–43; doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2014.09.008
LawtonL. J., & WeaverD. B. (2008). Factors associated with non-visitation by area to Congaree National Park, South Carolina. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 26, 66–82.
47.
LeY., HolmesN. C., & KuleszaC. (2012. Barriers to a Backyard National Park: Case Study of African American Communities in Columbia, SC. Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Available from: https://npshistory.com/publications/cong/nrr-2012-604.pdf
48.
LeeK. J., & ScottD. (2016). Bourdieu and African Americans’ park visitation: The case of Cedar Hill State Park in Texas. Leisure Sciences, 38, 424–440; doi: 10.1080/01490400.2015.1127188
49.
LeeK. J., CasperJ., PowellR., & FloydM. F. (2023). African Americans’ outdoor recreation involvement, leisure satisfaction, and subjective well-being. Current Psychology, 42, 27840–27850; doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03905-2
50.
LoTemplioS. B., ScottE. E., McDonnellA. S., HopmanR. J., CastroS. C., McNayG. D., … StrayerD. L. (2020). Nature as a potential modulator of the error-related negativity: A registered report. International Journal of Psychophysiology: official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 156, 49–59; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.06.014
51.
LoTemplioS., BettmannJ. E., ScottE., & BlumenthalE. (2023). Do mental health changes in nature co-occur with changes in heartrate variability and executive functioning? A systematic review. Current Environmental Health Reports, 10, 278–290; doi: 10.1007/s40572-023-00407-6
52.
MarselleM. R., HartigT., CoxD. T. C., de BellS., KnappS., LindleyS., … BonnA. (2021). Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: A conceptual framework. Environment International, 150, 106420; doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106420
53.
MartinA. L., AdamsA. E., & SteinT. V. (2024). Equity, identity, and representation in outdoor recreation: ‘I am not an outdoors person. ‘Leisure Studies, 43, 531–544; doi: 10.1080/02614367.2023.2232558
54.
MartinL., WhiteM. P., HuntA., RichardsonM., PahlS., & BurtJ. (2020). Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101389; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389
55.
MayerF. S., FrantzC. M., Bruehlman-SenecalE., & DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial?: The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643; doi: 10.1177/0013916508319745
McDonnellA. S., & StrayerD. L. (2024). The influence of a walk in nature on human resting brain activity: A randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports, 14, 27253; doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78508-x
58.
MiteuG. D. (2024). Ethics in scientific research: A lens into its importance, history, and future. Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012), 86, 2395–2398; doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001959
59.
MoonK., GuerreroA. M., AdamsV. M., BiggsD., BlackmanD. A., CravenL., … RossH. (2019). Mental models for conservation research and practice. Conservation Letters, 12, e12642; doi: 10.1111/conl.12642
60.
NardoneA., RudolphK. E., Morello-FroschR., & CaseyJ. A. (2021). Redlines and greenspace: The relationship between historical redlining and 2010 greenspace across the United States. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129, 17006; doi: 10.1289/EHP7495
61.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & MurphyS. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740; doi: 10.1177/0013916508318748
62.
O’brienW. E. (2012). State parks and Jim Crow in the decade before Brown v. Board of education. Geographical Review, 102, 166–179; doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2012.00141.x
63.
Osei OwusuR., & RigolonA. (2025). What has contributed to green space inequities in U.S. cities? A narrative review. Journal of Planning Literature, 40, 59–76; doi: 10.1177/08854122241269981
64.
PassmoreH.-A., & HowellA. J. (2014). Eco-existential positive psychology: Experiences in nature, existential anxieties, and well-being. The Humanistic Psychologist, 42, 370–388; doi: 10.1080/08873267.2014.920335
65.
PinckneyH. P., HicksA. S., SèneA. L., & FloydM. F. (2025). “We have our own cultural ways of being in nature”: New perspectives on African Americans’ relationships to U.S. National Parks. Journal of Leisure Research, 56, 296–313; doi: 10.1080/00222216.2023.2295869
66.
RobertsJ. D. (2022). Black bodies: It’s time to reclaim our green space freedom. Journal of Healthy Eating and Active Living, 2, 1–4.
67.
RookL. (2013). Mental models: A robust definition. The Learning Organization, 20, 38–47; doi: 10.1108/09696471311288519’%255D
68.
RosaC. D., & ColladoS. (2020). Enhancing nature conservation and health: Changing the focus to active pro-environmental behaviours. Psychological Studies, 65, 9–15; doi: 10.1007/s12646-019-00516-z
69.
RughS. S. (2008). Are We There Yet? The Golden Age of American Family Vacations. University Press of Kansas. doi: 10.2307/jj.17733059
70.
ScottD. A., & DuersonL. M. (2010). Continuing the discussion: A commentary on “wilderness therapy: Ethical considerations for mental health professionals. Child & Youth Care Forum, 39, 63–68; doi: 10.1007/s10566-009-9090-x
71.
StevensonM. P., SchilhabT., & BentsenP. (2018). Attention Restoration Theory II: A systematic review to clarify attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part B, Critical Reviews, 21, 227–268; doi: 10.1080/10937404.2018.1505571
72.
StockwellD. W., RocheM., & BillingsJ. (2025). Evaluating interventions that have improved access to community mental health care for Black men: A systematic review. Journal of Mental Health (Abingdon, England), 34, 450–462; doi: 10.1080/09638237.2024.2390381
73.
TamlynK., JohnsonS., CollinsS. A., FarwellJ., ZarestkyJ., WalkerS., & LoTemplioS. (2024. Nature and health practitioner needs assessment: Investigating organizational capacity to leverage science for impact. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10217/238967
74.
TheriaultD., & MowattR. A. (2020). Both sides now: Transgression and oppression in African Americans’ historical relationships with nature. Leisure Sciences, 42, 15–31; doi: 10.1080/01490400.2018.1448024
75.
TobinM. J. (2022). Fiftieth anniversary of uncovering the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The story and timeless lessons. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 205, 1145–1158; doi: 10.1164/rccm.202201-0136SO
76.
TsunetsuguY., ParkB.-J., IshiiH., HiranoH., KagawaT., & MiyazakiY. (2007). Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest) in an old-growth broadleaf forest in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 26, 135–142; doi: 10.2114/jpa2.26.135
77.
UlrichR. S., SimonsR. F., LositoB. D., FioritoE., MilesM. A., & ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230; doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
78.
VirdenR. J., & GordonW. J. (1999). Ethnic/Racial and gender variations among meanings given to, and preferences for, the natural environment. Leisure Sciences, 21, 219–239; doi: 10.1080/014904099273110
79.
WildI. R., Treviño GonzalezM. J., & WilliamsA. (2025). Queering adventure: Building communities outdoors to combat social and environmental injustice. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1–22; doi: 10.1080/14729679.2025.2486841
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
