Medicine has historically been conceptualized as not simply an occupation but rather as a profession, one that entails both substantial privileges as well as significant responsibilities. In this article, the majority of whose authors are cardiologists serving on the American College of Cardiology Ethics Committee, we observe the evolution of professional values in Western medicine along a continuum shaped by both intrinsic and extrinsic forces with respect to the physician and the medical profession. Though a historically reactive process, we argue for a more proactive and anticipatory approach moving forward that reframes professionalism and what it means to be part of a profession, aiming to reconcile cross-generational professional values in the interest of advancing health and human flourishing. Rather than rejecting the power and privilege of our profession, thus leaving a vacuum to be filled by administrators and politicians, we should reclaim and repurpose it to provide better care and promote better outcomes.
HudsonK. The learned professions. In: The Jargon of the Professions, 1st ed. Palgrave Macmillan: London; 1978; pp. 22–41.
2.
BenjaminIJ, ValentineCM, OetgenWJ, et al.2020 American heart association and American college of cardiology consensus conference on professionalism and ethics: A consensus conference report. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021; 77(24):3079–3133.
3.
PorterR. Conclusion. In: Health for Sale: Quackery in England 1660–1850, 1st ed. Manchester University Press: Manchester; 1989; pp. 237–239.
4.
StarrP. Introduction: The social origins of professional sovereignty. In: Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry, 1st ed. Basic Books: New York; 1982; pp. 3–29.
5.
JonesJH. A moral astigmatism. In: Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, 1st ed. Free Press: New York; 1981; pp. 1–15.
6.
ReillyPR. Eugenics and involuntary sterilization: 1907–2015. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 2015; 16:351–368.
7.
Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927). Library of Congress.
8.
WashingtonHA. Epilogue. In: Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, 1st ed. Random House: New York; 2019.
9.
LawrenceW. History of surgical oncology. In: Surgery. (NortonJA, et al. eds.) Springer: Berlin; 2001; pp. 1565–1576.
10.
VeronesiU, StafylaV. Grand challenges in surgical oncology. Front Oncol, 2012; 2:127.
11.
BarryMJ, Edgman-LevitanS. Shared decision making—The pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med, 2012; 366(9):780–781.
12.
FischerBA.IV. A summary of important documents in the field of research ethics. Schizophr Bull, 2006; 32(1):69–80.
13.
BrockDW. The ideal of shared decision making between physicians and patients. Kennedy Inst Ethics J, 1991; 1(1):28–47.
14.
KilbrideMK, JoffeS. The new age of patient autonomy: Implications for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA, 2018; 320(19):1973–1974.
15.
ReiserSJ. The silent world of doctor and patient. JAMA, 1985; 253(19):2897.
16.
IgelLH, LernerBH. Moving past individual and “pure” autonomy: The rise of family-centered patient care. AMA J Ethics, 2016; 18(1):56–62.
17.
KaneFI. Keeping Elizabeth Bouvia alive for the public good. Hastings Cent Rep, 1985; 15(6):5–8.
18.
GloverJJ. The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1990; 38(5):588–593.
19.
KennedyIM. The Karen Quinlan case: Problems and proposals. J Med Ethics, 1976; 2:3–7.
20.
AnnasGJ. “Culture of life” politics at the bedside—The case of Terri Schiavo. N Engl J Med, 2005; 352(16):1710–1715.
21.
BolsterL, RourkeL. The effect of restricting residents’ duty hours on patient safety, resident well-being, and resident education: An updated systematic review. J Grad Med Educ, 2015; 7(3):349–363.
22.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Optimizing Graduate Medical Trainee (Resident) Hours and Work Schedule to Improve Patient Safety. Resident Duty Hours: Enhancing Sleep, Supervision, and Safety. (UlmerC, Miller WolmanD, JohnsMME., eds.) National Academies Press: Washington DC; 2009. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK214946/
23.
ReedDA, LevineRB, MillerRG, et al.Effect of residency duty-hour limits: Views of key clinical faculty. Arch Intern Med., 2007; 167(14):1487–1492.
24.
HarrisonR, AllenE. Teaching internal medicine residents in the new era. Inpatient attending with duty-hour regulations. J Gen Intern Med, 2006; 21(5):447–452.
25.
AwanM, ZagalesI, McKenneyM, KinslowK, ElkbuliA. ACGME 2011 duty hours restrictions and their effects on surgical residency training and patients outcomes: A systematic review. J Surg Educ, 2021; 78(6):e35–e46.
26.
MacaronMM, Segun-OmosehinOA, MatarRH, et al.A systematic review and meta analysis on burnout in physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic: A hidden healthcare crisis. Front Psychiatry, 2022; 13:1071397.
27.
AlkhameesAA, AljohaniMS, KalaniS, et al.Physician’s burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2023; 20(5):4598.
28.
Haubitz-EschelbachA, DurmisiM, HaubitzS, et al.The glory of the age is the wisdom of grey hair: Association of physician appearance with outcomes in hospitalised medical patients—An observational study. Swiss Med Wkly, 2019; 149:w20162.
29.
AhmadSR, AhmadTR, BalasubramanianV, et al.Are you really the doctor? Physician experiences with gendered microaggressions from patients. J Womens Health, 2022; 31(4):521–532.
30.
XunH, ChenJ, SunAH, et al.Public perceptions of physician attire and professionalism in the US. JAMA Netw Open, 2021; 4(7):e2117779.
31.
JonesACT, RepkeA, BatastiniAB, SaccoD, DahlenER, MohnRS. The power of presentation: How attire, cosmetics, and posture impact the source credibility of women expert witnesses. J Forensic Sci, 2023; 68(3):962–971.
32.
KhojahIM, AlghamdiMK, AlahmariBM, et al.Patients’ impression of health care providers’ attire in the emergency department. Cureus., 2022; 14(12):e32844.
33.
FilutA, AlvarezM, CarnesM. Discrimination toward physicians of color: A systematic review. J Nat Med Assoc, 2020; 112(2):117–140.
34.
EliasonMJ, DibbleSL, RobertsonPA. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) physicians’ experiences in the workplace. J Homosex, 2011; 58(10):1355–1371.
35.
TrejoJ. The burden of service for faculty of color to achieve diversity and inclusion: The minority tax. Mol Biol Cell, 2020; 31(25):2752–2754.
36.
ChenH, PiersonE, Schmer-GalunderS, et al.Gender differences in patient perceptions of physicians’ communal traits and the impact on physician evaluations. J Womens Health, 2021; 30(4):551–556.
37.
FrankE, HarveyL, ElonL. Family responsibilities and domestic activities of US women physicians. Arch Fam Med, 2000; 9(2):134–140.
38.
ChesakSS, SalinasM, AbrahamH, et al.Experiences of gender inequity among women physicians across career stages: Findings from participant focus groups. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle), 2022; 3(1):359–368.
39.
LyuHG, DavidsJS, ScullyRE, MelnitchoukN. Association of domestic responsibilities with career satisfaction for physician mothers in procedural vs nonprocedural fields. JAMA Surg, 2019; 154(8):689–695.
40.
WalshM, ArrighiJ, CacchioneJG, et al.ACC health policy statement on career flexibility in cardiology: A report of the American college of cardiology solution set oversight committee. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022; 80(22):2135–2155.
KhabsaJ, PetkovicJ, RiddleA, et al.PROTOCOL: Conflict of interest issues when engaging stakeholders in health and healthcare guideline development: A systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev, 2022; 18(2):e1232.
43.
BurdenM, AstikG, AuerbachA, et al.Identifying and measuring administrative harms experienced by hospitalists and administrative leaders. JAMA Intern Med, 2024; 184(9):1014–1023.
44.
O’DonnellWJ. Reducing administrative harm in medicine—Clinicians and administrators together. N Engl J Med, 2022; 386:2429–2432.
45.
O’DonnellWJ. Another physician bites the dust: It’s time for administrative accountability. Am J Med, 2024; 137:566–567.
46.
HavlikJL, MercurioMR, HullSC. The case for ethical efficiency: A system that has run out of time. Hastings Cent Rep, 2022; 52:1–20.
47.
FoxDM. Policy commercializing nonprofits in health: The history of a paradox from the 19th century to the ACA. Milbank Q, 2015; 93(1):179–210.
48.
JonesCH, DolstenM. Healthcare on the brink: Navigating the challenges of an aging society in the United States. NPJ Aging, 2024; 10(1):25.
49.
DafnyL. Does it matter if your health insurer is for profit? Effects of ownership on premiums, insurance coverage and medical spending. AEJ: Econ Policy, 2019; 11(1):222–265.
50.
LinH, McCarthyIM, RichardsM. Hospital pricing following integration with physician practices. J Health Econ, 2021; 77:102444.
51.
CurtoV, SinaikoAD, RosenthalMB. Price effects of vertical integration and joint contracting between physicians and hospitals in Massachusetts. Health Aff (Millwood), 2022; 41(5):741–750.
52.
BorsaA, BejaranoG, EllenM, BruchJD. Evaluating trends in private equity ownership and impacts on health outcomes, costs, and quality: Systematic review. BMJ, 2023; 382:e075244.
53.
SulmasyDP. Physicians, cost control, and ethics. Ann Intern Med, 1992; 116(11):920–926.
54.
MayWF. The beleaguered rulers: The public obligation of the professional. Kennedy Inst Ethics J, 1992; 2(1):25–41.
WarmE, HirshDA, KinnearB, et al.The shadow economy of effort: Unintended consequences of pass/fail grading on medical students’ clinical education and patient care skills. Acad Med, 2025; 100(4):419–424.
61.
LowD, PollackSW, LiaoZC, et al.Racial/ethnic disparities in clinical grading in medical school. Teach Learn Med, 2019; 31(5):487–496.
62.
GorthDJ, MageeRG, RosenbergSE, et al.Gender disparity in evaluation of internal medicine clerkship performance. JAMA Netw Open, 2021; 4(7):e2115661.
63.
RojekAE, KhannaR, YimJWL, et al.Differences in narrative language in evaluations of medical students by gender and under-represented minority status. J Gen Intern Med, 2019; 34(5):684–691.
64.
O’SullivanL, KagaboW, PrasadN, LaporteD, AiyerA. Racial and ethnic bias in medical school clinical grading: A review. J Surg Educ, 2023; 80:806–816.
65.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; National Academy of Medicine; Committee on Systems Approaches to Improve Patient Care by Supporting Clinician Well-Being. Taking action against clinician burnout: A systems approach to professional well-being. National Academies Press: Washington DC; 2019. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK552615/
66.
MelnickER, DyrbyeLN, SinskyCA, et al.The association between perceived electronic health record usability and professional burnout among US physicians. Mayo Clin Proc, 2020; 95(3):476–487.
