Potential is an ambivalent concept, one that is often drawn on in ways that may occlude the political possibilities of the present moment. This paper engages with the tense of potential, highlighting how narrations of possible futures can foreclose alternative possibilities. I analyze two common modalities in which potential appears; potential as abstract hope, and potential as an otherwise that needs to be attuned to. I show, through a brief reflection on the making of mineral futures in the Canadian mining industry, how potential is ambivalent, available (and necessary) to capital as much as it is available to anti-capitalist or non-capitalist movements. I then sketch a genealogy of potential, highlighting a few of the sources through which potential is thought. In doing so, I suggest the need to attend to a set of different concerns, namely, who has the power to actualize, why we might want to make this the focus of our critical attention, and why working ethically alongside the cramped spaces within which efforts to actualize otherwise potentials exist may be a more effective form of analysis and politics. I emphasize the importance of understanding potential within its emplaced contexts and argue for a more holistic engagement with potential in academic discourse, considering both liberation and foreclosure in the actualization of otherwises and alternatives.
AgambenG (2011) Nudities(D Kishik and S Pedatella, Trans.).Stanford: Stanford University.
2.
AttohKDaltonCFraserE, et al. (2024) Speculative geographies: fictions and futures. Dialogues in Human Geography14(2): 371–380.
3.
BennettJ (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BerlantL (2011) Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
BlaserMDe la CadenaM (2017) The uncommons: an introduction. Anthropologica59(2): 185–193.
6.
BledsoeAMcCrearyTWrightW (2022) Theorizing diverse economies in the context of racial capitalism. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences132: 281–290.
7.
BlochEPlaiceNPlaiceS, et al. (1986) The Principle of Hope, Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BosteelsB (2014) The Actuality of Communism. London: Verso Books.
9.
BraunB (2000) Producing vertical territory: geology and governmentality in late Victorian Canada. Ecumene7(1): 7–46.
10.
BrigstockeJNooraniT (2016) Posthuman attunements: AESTHETICS, authority and the arts of creative listening. GeoHumanities2(1): 1–7.
11.
ButlerP (2015) Colonial Extractions: Race and Canadian Mining in Contemporary Africa. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
12.
ButlerP (2015) Colonial Extractions: Race and Canadian Mining in Contemporary Africa. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
13.
ByrdJA (2011) The Transit of Empire: Indigenous Critiques of Colonialism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
ChuaC (2020) Abolition is a constant struggle: five lessons from Minneapolis. Theory & Event23(5): S-127–S-147.
15.
CohenJJDuckertL (eds) (2015Elemental Ecocriticism: Thinking with Earth, Air, Water, and Fire. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
16.
CollardR-CDempseyJ (2020) Two icebergs: difference in feminist political economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space52(1): 237–247.
17.
CoulthardGS (2014) Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
DekeyserT (2023) Worldless futures: on the allure of “worlds to come”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers48(2): 338–350.
19.
DeleuzeG (1992) Postscript on the societies of Control. 1990. Cultural Theory: An Anthology139–142.
20.
EspositoR (2008) Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
Esteban MuñozJ (2009) Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York and London: New York University Press.
22.
Gibson-GrahamJK (1996) The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
Gibson-GrahamJK (2008) Diverse economies: performative practices for other worlds. Progress in Human Geography32(5): 613–632.
24.
GillsL (2022) Rickford has strong words for environmental groups: there’s no green economy without mining. Timmins Today, 7 April.
25.
Gómez-BarrisM (2017) The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
HarawayDJ (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
27.
HoogeveenD (2015) Sub-surface property, free-entry mineral staking and settler colonialism in Canada. Antipode47(1): 121–138.
28.
ImaiSGardnerLWeinbergerS (2016) The Canada Brand: Violence and Canadian Mining Companies in Latin America.
29.
KingTL (2019) The Black Shoals: Offshore Formations of Black and Native Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30.
KirschS (2014) Mining Capitalism: The Relationship Between Corporations and Their Critics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
KneasD (2020) Placing resources: junior mining companies and the locus of mineral potential. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences117: 268–278.
32.
LawsonV (2007) Geographies of care and responsibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers97(1): 1–11.
33.
LiF (2015) Unearthing Conflict: Corporate Mining, Activism, and Expertise in Peru. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
NienaberM (2022) Volkswagen, Mercedes to sign deals with Canada for battery supplies. Financial Post, 22 August.
39.
PovinelliEA (2011) Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
40.
PovinelliEA (2012) The will to be otherwise/the effort of endurance. South Atlantic Quarterly111(3): 453–475.
41.
RobinsonCJ (2020) Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition, Revised and updated 3rd ed.Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
42.
SandlosJKeelingA (2013) Zombie Mines and the (Over) burden of History. Solutions Journal4: 3.
43.
SharpeS (2014) Potentiality and impotentiality in J. K. Gibson-Graham. Rethinking Marxism26(1): 27–43.
44.
SpillersHJ (1987) Mama’s baby, papa’s maybe: An American grammar book. Diacritics17(2): 65–81.
45.
SpinozaB (1992) Ethics: With the Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect and Selected Letters. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
46.
StanleyA (2016) Resilient settler colonialism: “responsible resource development”, “flow-through” financing, and the risk management of Indigenous sovereignty in Canada. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48(12): 2422–2442.
47.
The Antipode Editorial Collective (ed) (2019) Keywords in Radical Geography: Antipode at 50. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
48.
ThriftN (2004) Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography86(1):57–78.
49.
TreiberGChristiaensT (2021) Introduction: Italian theory and the problem of potentiality. Italian Studies76(2): 121–127.
50.
TsingALBubandtNGanE, et al. (eds) (2017) Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
51.
TuckEYangKW (2014) R-words: Refusing research. Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities223–248.
52.
VoylesTB (2015) Wastelanding: Legacies of Uranium Mining in Navajo Country. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
53.
WynterS (1976) Ethno or socio poetics. Alcheringa: Ethnopoetics2(2): 78–94.
54.
WynterS (2003) Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review3(3): 257–337.
