This intervention is to delineate an alternative to a largely capitalism-accommodating physical geography by discussing the relevance of Marxism. To illustrate this, I elaborate on major Marxist concepts. It turns out that some currents within physical geography converge with Marxist understandings of science and could be further enhanced by a Marxist framework, possibly by way of a recently emerging Critical Physical Geography (CPG). I conclude by sharing how Marxism resonates with my own projects involving soils.
BhaskarR (2008) Dialectic. The Pulse of Freedom. London: Routledge.
2.
BlaikieP (1985) The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries. Longman: Essex.
3.
BlaikieP.BrookfieldH. (eds) (1987) Land Degradation and Society. London: Methuen.
4.
BradleyP (1983) Underdevelopment and physical geography: bias and relevance in the Sahel. In: The London Group of the Union of Socialist Geographers (eds)Society and Nature: Socialist Perspectives on the Relationship between Human and Physical Geography. London: Union of Socialist Geographers, pp.2–46.
5.
BurawoyM (1990) Marxism as science: historical challenges and theoretical growth. American Sociological Review55(6): 775–793.
6.
CastreeN (1995) The nature of produced nature: materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism. Antipode27(1): 12–48.
7.
CastreeN (2015) Capitalism and the Marxist critique of political ecology. In:PerreaultT.BridgeG.McCarthyJ. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.279–292.
8.
CoxKR (2006) Physical geography and the geographic thought course. Journal of Geography in Higher Education30(3): 373–388.
9.
Engel-Di MauroS (2018) Soils in eco-social context: soil pH and social relations of power in a northern Drava river floodplain agricultural area. In:LaveR.BiermannC.LaneS. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook Critical Physical Geography. New York: Palgrave, pp.393–419.
10.
Engel-Di MauroS (2020) Learning dialectics to grow better soils knowledge, not bigger crops: a materialist dialectics and relationality for soil science. Capitalism Nature Socialism31(1): 52–69.
11.
EngelsF (1908 [1880]) Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.
12.
EngelsF (1972 [1875-1882]) Dialectics of Nature. Translated by C Dutt. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
13.
FernandezH.MartinsF.IsidoroJMGP (2020) Mapping rainfall aggressiveness from physiographical data: application to the Grândola mountain range (Alentejo, Portugal). Physical Geography41(5): 451–466.
14.
FitzsimmonsM (1989) The matter of nature. Antipode21(2): 106–120.
15.
GouldSJ (1980) The Panda’s Thumb. More Reflections in Natural History. New York: WW Norton & Company.
16.
HailaY.LevinsR (1992) Humanity and nature. ecology, science and society. London: Pluto Press.
17.
Haines-YoungR.PetchJ (1986) Physical Geography: Its Nature and Methods. London: Paul Chapham Publishing.
18.
HarveyD (1984) On the history and present condition of geography: an historical Materialist manifesto. The Professional Geographer36(1): 1–11.
19.
HarveyD (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge: Blackwell.
20.
HazenHD.AnthamattenPJ (2004) Representation of ecological regions by protected areas at the global scale. Physical Geography25(6): 499–512.
21.
HendersonG (2009) Marxist political economy and the environment. In:CastreeN.DemerittD.LivermanD.et al. (eds) A Companion to Environmental Geography. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.266–293.
22.
HewittK (1983) Interpretations of Calamity from the Viewpoint of Human Ecology. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
23.
IlyenkovE (1982 [1960]) The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx’s Capital. New York: Progress Publishers.
KatzC.KirbyA (1991) In the nature of things: the environment and everyday life. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers16(3): 259–271.
26.
LaneSN.RichardsKS (1997) Linking river channel form and process: time, space and causality revisited. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms22(3): 249–260.
27.
LaveR.BiermannC.LaneSN (2018) Introducing critical physical geography. In:LaveR.BiermannC.LaneSN. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Physical Geography. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.3–21.
28.
LeachM.MearnsR. (eds) (1996) The Lie of the Land: Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment. James Currey: Oxford.
29.
LevinsR.LewontinR (1985) The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
30.
LewontinRC.RoseSPR.KaminLJ (1984) Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature. New York: Pantheon Books.
MarxK (1978a [1844]) Economic and Philosophic manuscripts of 1844. In:TuckerRC. (ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader. 2nd edn. New York: WW Norton & Company, pp.66–125.
33.
MarxK (1978b [1845]) The German ideology. In:TuckerRC. (ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader. 2nd edn. New York: WW Norton & Company, pp.146–200.
34.
MarxK (1978c [1891]) Critique of the Gotha program. In:TuckerRC. (ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader. . New York: WW Norton & Company, pp.525–541.
35.
MarxK (1992 [1867]) Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production. Volume 1. Translated by Moore S and E Aveling. New York: International Publishers.
36.
MasseyD (1999) Space-time, ‘Science’ and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers24(3): 261–276.
37.
MauroSE-D.Engel-Di MauroS (2019) Finding dialectical materialism through soils research. Human Geography12(2): 80–86.
38.
OldfieldJ.LajusJ.ShawDJB (2015) Conceptualizing and utilizing the natural environment: critical reflections from imperial and Soviet Russia. The Slavonic and East European Review93(1): 1–15.
39.
O’RiordanR.DaviesJ.StevensCet al. (2021) The ecosystem services of urban soils: a review. Geoderma395(3), 115076.
40.
PaolucciP (2007) Marx’s Scientific Dialectics: A Methodological Treatise for a New Century. Boston: Brill Academic Publishers.
41.
PeetR (1977) The development of radical geography in the United States. In:PeetR. (ed.), Radical Geography: Alternative Viewpoints on Contemporary Social Issues. Chicago: Maaroufa Press, pp.240–263.
42.
PeetR.WattsM. (eds) (2004) Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development and Social Movements. 2nd edn). London: Routledge.
43.
PhillipsJD (2018) Place formation and axioms for reading the natural landscape. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment42(6): 697–720.
44.
RhoadsBL.ThornCE (1994) Contemporary philosophical perspectives on physical geography with emphasis on Geomorphology. Geographical Review84(1): 90–101.
45.
RobbinsP (2019) Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. 3rd edn. New York: Wiley Blackwell.
46.
Saed (2016) The enduring relevance of state-socialism. Capitalism Nature Socialism27(4): 1–15.
47.
SchwartzmanD (1975) Althusser, Dialectical Materialism and the philosophy of science. Science & Society39(3): 318–330.
48.
SchwartzmanD (2002) Life, Temperature, and the Earth: The Self-Organizing Biosphere. New York: Columbia University Press.
49.
SheehanH (1985) Marxism and the Philosophy of Science: A Critical History. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
50.
SmithN (1990) Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Blackwell: Oxford.
51.
SmithN.O’KeefeP (1980) Geography, Marx and the concept of nature. Antipode12(2): 30–39.
52.
StanleyJ (1991) Marx, Engels and the administration of nature. History of Political Thought12(4): 647–670.
53.
TrudgillS (2012) The interactions between all neighbouring organisms: the roles of Charles Darwin, Ernst Haeckel and Eugenius warming in the evolution of ideas on plant dynamics. Progress in Physical Geography36(6): 853–861.
54.
TurnerMD (2009) Ecology: natural and political. In:CastreeN.DemerittD.LivermanD.et al. (eds) A Companion to Environmental Geography. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.181–197.
55.
WeinerDR (1988) Models of Nature. Ecology, Consrvation, and Cultural Revolution in Soviet Russia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
56.
ZimmererKS.BassettTJ. (eds) (2003) Political Ecology: An Integrative Approach to Geography and Environment-Development Studies. eds). New York: Guilford.
57.
WerskeyG (1978) The Visible College. The Collective Biography of British Scientific Socialists of the 1930s. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
WisnerB.GaillardJC.KelmanI (2012) Framing disaster. theories and stories seeking to understand hazards, vulnerability and risk. In:WisnerB.GaillardJC.KelmanI. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. London: Routledge, pp.18–47.
