This article reviews three theories of U.S. imperialism: super-imperialism, ultra-imperialism, and imperial rivalry, in the context of the U.S.'s relation to the current dollar dominated, financialized growth model. Instead of ultimately choosing one theory over others, based on an analysis of the Federal Reserve's response to the financial crisis of 2007/8, the article finds evidence for all three approaches, each emphasizing a particular aspect of the global political economy. The U.S. is currently torn among three tendencies: (1) a hegemonic state that dominates geoeconomically; (2) a state serving the interests of a transnational capitalist class: (3) a state increasingly in geopolitical competition and rivalry with other states.
AbramsP. (1988) Notes on the difficulty of studying the state.Journal of Historical Sociology, 1, 58–89.
2.
AgnewJ. (2005) Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics.Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95, 437–461.
3.
AgnewJ. (2009) Money games: Currencies and power in the contemporary world economy.Antipode, 1, 214–238.
BernankeS. B. (2011) The Effects of the Great Recession on Central Bank Doctrine and Practice. Speech presented at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 56th Economic Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, October. http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20111018a.htm (last accessed 14 December 2014).
7.
BrennerR. (2002) The Boom and the Bubble.London: Verso.
8.
BrennerR. (2005) The Economics of Global Turbulence.London: Verso.
9.
BroganP., and HugillD. (2014) Book review: The Making of Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of American Empire.Human Geography, 7, 102–107.
10.
BukharinN. (1972) Imperialism and World Economy.London: Merlin.
11.
CallinicosA. (2002) Marxism and global governance. In HeldD., & McGrewA. (Eds.) Governing Globalization (249–266). Cambridge: Polity.
12.
CallinicosA. (2006) Making sense of imperialism: A reply to Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin.International Socialism, 108, Online: http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?id=196&issue=110 (last accessed 14 December 2014).
13.
CallinicosA. (2007) Does capitalism need the state system?Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 4, 533–549.
14.
CallinicosA. (2009) Imperialism and Global Political Economy.Cambridge: Polity.
CohenB. J. (1998) The Geography of Money.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
17.
ColemanM. (2008) Power and space in the colonial present.Political Geography, 27, 339–370.
18.
CorbridgeS. (2006) Bearing witness: The global spigot, American empire, and the colonial present.Geopolitics, 11, 159–180.
19.
CowenD., and SmithN. (2009) After geopolitics? From the geopolitical social to geoeconomics.Antipode, 41, 22–48.
20.
DemerovicA. (2010) Materialist state theory and the transnationalization of the capitalist state.Antipode, 43, 38–59.
21.
DomoshM. (2013) Geoeconomic imaginations and economic geography in the early 20th century.Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, 944–966.
22.
EichengreenB. (2011) Exorbitant Privilege: The Rise and Fall of the Dollar.New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
FosterJ. B., and MagdoffF. (2009) The Great Financial Crisis: Causes and Consequences.New York: Monthly Review Press.
24.
GindinS., and PanitchL. (2012) The Making of Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of American Empire.London: Verso.
25.
GowanP. (1999) The Global Gamble.London: Verso.
26.
GowanP. (2009) Crisis in the heartland. Consequences of the new Wall Street system.New Left Review, 55: 1–14.
GregoryD. (2004) The Colonial Present.Oxford: Blackwell.
29.
HannahM (2005) ‘In full view yet invisible’: On Neil Smith's American Empire.Political Geography, 24, 239–243.
30.
HardtM., and NegriA. (2000) Empire.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
HarveyD. (1982) The Limits to Capital.Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
HarveyD. (2003) The New Imperialism.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
HarveyD. (2014) Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism.New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
HirschJ., and KannankulamJ. (2010) The spaces of capital: The political form of capitalism and the internationalization of the state.Antipode, 43, 12–37.
35.
HudsonM. (2003) Super Imperialism: The Origin and Fundamentals of U.S. World Dominance.London: Pluto Press.
36.
KearnsG. (2005) Review: The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq, Derek Gregory.Journal of Historical Geography, 31, 186–187.
37.
KautskyK. (1988) The Materialist Conception of History.New Haven: Yale University Press.
38.
LeninV. I. (1969) Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism.New York: International Publishers.
39.
MercilleJ. (2008) The radical geopolitics of US foreign policy: Geopolitical and geoeconomic logics of power.Political Geography, 27, 570–586.
PanitchL., and GindinS. (2006) ‘Imperialism and global political economy'—a reply to Alex Callinicos.International Socialism, 109, Online: http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?id=175&issue=109 (last accessed 14 December 2014).
42.
PanitchL., and GindinS. (2008) Finance and American Empire. In PanitchL., & KoningsM. (Eds.) American Empire and the Political Economy of Global Finance (17–47). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
PanitchL., & KoningsM. (Eds.) (2008) American Empire and the Political Economy of Global Finance.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
PrasadS. E. (2014) The Dollar Trap.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
45.
RobinsonI. W. (2001) Social theory and globalization: The rise of the transnational state.Theory and Society, 30, 157–200.
46.
RobinsonI. W. (2007) The pitfalls of realist analysis of global capitalism: A critique of Ellen Meiksins Wood's Empire of Capital.Historical Materialism, 15, 71–93.
47.
RobinsonI. W. (2011) Global capitalism theory and the emergence of the transnational elites.Critical Sociology, 38, 349–363.
48.
RowthornB. (1971) Imperialism in the 1970's – unity or rivalry?New Left Review, 69, 31–54.
49.
SklairL. (2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class.Oxford: Blackwell.
50.
SmithN. (2003) American Empire: Roosevelt's Geographer and the Prelude to Globalization.Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
SoderbergS. (2004) The Politics of the New International Financial Architecture: Reimposing Neoliberal Domination in the Global South.New York: Palgrave.
52.
ToalG. (2004) Derek Gregory's The Colonial Present.Political Geography, 27, 339–343.
