An ecological and eco-feminist critique may promote an innovative environmentalist urban policy. A new relation between humanity and nature implies a different aesthetic and architecture of the city. In the past, in control of the public sphere, men built their cities according to their attitudes and values. Traditional (masculine) behavior produced an efficiency based in dominating a resilient nature. This approach is no longer viable given the environmental crisis. Women are the privileged subjects of radical change, assuming a leadership role in the environmentalist movement and proposing cities envisaged according to a new way of thinking and feeling that accords with a reconsidered relationship between humanity and nature.
AgarwalB. (2000) “Conceptualising environmental collective action: why gender matters”, in Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(3): 283–310
2.
BocchiG., CerutiM. (2008) La sfida della comp-lessità.Milano. Mondadori
3.
BoyerM. C. (1986) Dreaming the Rational City.Cambridge (Mass).MIT Press.
4.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.RoutledgeNew York.
5.
CapraF (2007) The Science of Leonardo. Inside the Mind of the Great Genius of the Renaissance.DoubledayNew York.
6.
CapraF. (1975) The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels Between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism.Berkeley (California): Shambhala Publication.
7.
Dogson GrayE. (1994) “Coming Inside the Circle of Creation: The Ethic of Attunement”, in Fer-ré-Hartel (1994).
8.
FerréF., HartelP. (eds.) (1994) Ethics and Environmental Policy. Theory Meets Practice.Athens (Ga)-London: The University of Georgia Press.
9.
Gibson-GrahamJ.K., RoelvinkG. (2010) An Economic Ethics for the Anthropocene, Antipode, 41(1): 320–346
10.
GroszE. (2005) Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power.Crows Nest (Aus.): Allen and Unwin.
11.
HarveyD. (1989) The Condition of Postmoder-nity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Baltimore.The Johs Hopkins University Press.
12.
HarveyD. (2000) Spaces of Hope.Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
JamiesonD. (2008) Ethics and the Environment. An Introduction.Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
JasanoffS. (1995) Science at the Bar: Law Science and Techology in America.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
15.
LatourB. (2012) Enquete sur le modes d'existence. Une anthropologie des Modernes.Paris (France): La Dé-couverte.
16.
LeahyT. (2003) Ecofeminism in theory and practice: Women's responses to environmental issues [online].Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies: JIGS, 7, No. 1-2.
17.
MorinE. (2008) Sur la méthode.Paris (France): Editions du SEUIL
18.
PlumwoodV (1991) “Nature, Self and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism”, in Hypatia, 6, 1.
19.
PoliC. (1994) “The Political Consequences of an Environmental Question”, inEthics and Environmental Policy. Theory Meets Practice (Ferré and Hartel eds.). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
20.
PoliC. (2009) Città flessibili. Una rivoluzione nel governo urbano.Torino: INSTAR libri.
21.
PoliC. (2010) “Sustainable Development: From Fallacy to Fraud”,Human Geography3(2), 63–82.
22.
PoliC. (2011) Mobility and Environment. Humanists vs. Engineers in Urban Policy and Professional Education.New York-London: Springer.
23.
PoliC. (2012) “An Environmentalist Re-Patterning of Political Language and Practice: From Freedom and Justice to Responsibility for Nature”,Human Geography5, 2: 1–13.
24.
RawlsJ. (1971) A Theory of Justice.Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
25.
RayP. H., AndersonS. R. (2000) The Cultural Creatives.New York: Harmony Books.
26.
RichterI. ed. (1952) The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci.New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
27.
RuskinJ. (1851-1853) The Stones of Venice.London: Smith, Elder & Co.
28.
SennettR. (1979) The Uses of Disorder: Personal Identity and City Life.New York: Kopf
29.
SennettR. (1990) The conscience of the Eye.New York (NY): Knopf.
30.
SennettR. (2008) The Craftsman.London: Allen Lane.
31.
SennettR. (2011) The Foreigner: Two Essays on Exile, London: Notting Hill.
32.
SennettR. (2012) Together: The Rituals, Pleasures, and Politics of Cooperation.New Haven: Yale University Press.
33.
Shrader-FrechetteK. S., McCoyE. D. (1993) Method in Ecolog y, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Shrader-FrechetteK. (1991) Risk and Rationality. Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reform.Berkeley (Ca.): University of California Press
35.
SimmelG. (1994-1909) “Bridge and Door.” Translated by Mark Ritter. Theory, Culture & Society.11: 5–10. Original: Das Individuum und die Freiheit. Essais. “Brücke und Tür”, 2-12. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.
36.
SwyngedouwE. (2005) “Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance beyond-the-state”,Urban Studies, 42, 1–16.
37.
SwyngedouwE. (2007) “Impossible ‘Sustainabil-ity’ and the Postpolitical Condition”, inThe Sustainable Development Paradox, KruegerRob, and GibbsDavid (eds.). London.
38.
SwyngedouwE. (2011) “Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces”,Political Geography30: 370–380.
39.
TallacchiniM. C. (1996) Diritto per la natura.Torino: Giappichelli Editore.
40.
TallacchiniM. C. (2009) “From commitment to committees”, in Seminar: Knowledge in Question. A Symposium on Interrogating Knowledge and Questioning Science, 597, May (also see www.india-seminar. com)
41.
TaylorP. (1986) Respect for Nature. A Theory of Environmental Ethics.Princeton (NJ): Princeton Uni-veristy Press.
42.
ViardJ. (2011) Nouveau portrait de la France. La societé des modes de vie. éditions de l'aube. La Tour d'AiguesFrance.
