In this paper, we explore how an injection of new materialist understandings and insights related to culture, bodies and assemblages offer creative— and much needed— modes of engagement with Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs) as “capacities of place.” We do this by intersecting the formal purpose and intent of TCPs with some of the perspectives and practices of the different Indigenous and cultural communities with whom we have worked over the years. Ultimately, our goal with this paper is to demonstrate how a focus on what TCPs do inclusive of Indigenous worldviews and parallel new materialist insights hold significant political implications and empowering possibilities for different communities by expanding understandings of the ways tangibility and integrity relate to TCPs through embodied practices of culture-place assemblages and the rubber-bands of space-time.
AscherM.2008“Ethnomathematics” in SelinH. (ed) Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures Vol. 1, pp. 899–903Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
2.
BenderB.2001. “Landscapes On-the-Move”Journal of Social Archaeology1(1): 75–89.
3.
BoscoF.J.2004. “Human rights politics and scaled performances of memory: conflicts among the Madres de Plaza de Mayo in Argentina”Social & Cultural Geography5(3): 381–402.
4.
BraithwaiteC.A.1998. “Navajo Communication and The University Classroom”Intercultural Communication StudiesVIII-1 1998–9: 33–42.
5.
CooleD., and FrostS.2010. “Introducing the New Materialisms” in CooleD., and FrostS. (eds) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, pp. 1–43Durham: Duke University Press.
6.
CurtiG.H.2008a. “From a wall of bodies to a body of walls: Politics of affect | Politics of memory | Politics of war”Emotion, Space and Society1: 106–118.
7.
CurtiG.H.2008b. “The ghost in the city and a landscape of life: a reading of difference in Shirow and Oshii's Ghost in the Shell”Society and Space26(1): 87–106.
8.
CurtiG.H., and MorenoC.M.2010. “Institutional borders, revolutionary imaginings and the becoming-adult of the child”Children's Geographies8(4): 413–427.
9.
De LandaM.2006. New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social ComplexityLondon: Continuum International Publishing.
10.
DeleuzeG.Difference & RepetitionNew York: Columbia University Press.
11.
DoelM.1999. Poststructuralist Geographies: The Diabolical Art of Spatial ScienceLanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
12.
ErikssonK.2005. “Foucault, Deleuze, and the Ontology of Networks”The European Legacy10(6): 595–610.
13.
FooteK.2003. Shadowed Ground: America's Landscapes of Violence and Tragedy (revised and updated edition) Austin: University of Texas Press.
14.
GarroutteE.M.2003. Real Indians: Identity and the Survival of Native AmericaBerkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Griffin-PierceT.1992. Earth is My Mother, Sky is My Father: Space, Time, and Astronomy in Navajo SandpaintingAlbuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
16.
HuyssenA.2003. Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of MemoryPalo Alto: Stanford University Press.
17.
JettS.C.1995. “Navajo Sacred Places: Management and Interpretation of Mythic History”The Public Historian17(2): 39–47.
18.
KelleyK., and FrancisH.1994. Navajo Sacred PlacesBloomington: Indiana University Press.
19.
KingT.F.2003. Places That CountWalnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
20.
LeeL.L.2006. “Navajo Cultural Identity: What Can the Navajo Nation Bring to the American Indian Identity Discussion Table?”Wicazo Sa Review21(2): 79–103.
21.
LinfordL.D.2000. Navajo Places: History, Legend, LandscapeSalt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
22.
MartinJ.A. n.d. Significant Traditional Cultural Properties of the Navajo PeopleWindow Rock: Traditional Culture Program, Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department.
23.
MasseyD.2005. For Space.London: Sage.
24.
MassumiB.2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, SensationDurham: Duke University Press.
25.
McPhersonR.S.1992. Sacred Land, Sacred View: Navajo Perceptions of the Four Corners RegionSalt Lake City: Signature Books.
26.
MilhollandS.2010. “In the Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding and Resolving Incompatible Ideologies and Languages in US Environmental and Cultural Laws in Relationship to Navajo Sacred Lands”American Indian Culture and Research Journal34(2): 103–124.
27.
MinthornP.E.1998. It Is Good That You Are Listening: The Dynamics of Native American Cultural Resource Management”Practicing Anthropology20(3): 31–32.
28.
MitchellD.1995. “There's No Such Thing as Culture: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Idea of Culture in Geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers20(1): 102–116.
29.
MitchellD.2000. Cultural Geography: A Critical IntroductionOxford: Blackwell.
30.
NPS (National Park Service, by the staff of the National Register of Historic Places)1997. “National Register Bulletin: How to Define Categories of Historic Properties”U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington D.C.
31.
PabloM.2001. “Preservation as Perpetuation”American Indian Quarterly25(1): 18–20.
32.
ParkerP.L., and KingT.F.1998. “Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties. National Register Bulletin 38.”U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington D.C.
33.
ParrA.2008. Deleuze and Memorial Culture: Desire, Singular Memory and the Politics of TraumaEdinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
34.
ShipekF.C.1977. A Strategy for Change: The Luiseño of Southern California. Dissertation, University of Hawaii.
35.
SchortmanE., and UrbanP.2011. “Power, Memory, and Prehistory: Constructing and Erasing Political Landscapes in the Naco Valley, Northwestern Honduras”American Anthropologist113(1): 5–21.
36.
SchwarzM.T.1997. “Unraveling the Anchoring Cord: Navajo Relocation, 1974 to 1996”American Anthropologist99(1): 43–55.
37.
SmytheC.W.2009. “The National Register Framework for Protecting Cultural Heritage Places:George Wright Forum26(1): 14–27.
38.
SturkenM.1997. Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS Epidemic, and the Politics of RememberingBerkeley: University of California Press.
39.
TillK.E.2005. The New Berlin: Memory, Politics, PlaceMinneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
40.
WhiteR.C.1957. “The Luiseño Theory of ‘Knowledge”’American Anthropologist59(1): 1–19.
41.
WilsonK.2003. “Therapeutic landscapes and First Nations peoples: an exploration of culture, health and place”Health & Place9: 83–93.
42.
WinthropR.H.1998a. Contribution to Erlandson et al. “The Making of Chumash Tradition: Replies to Haley and Wilcoxon”Current Anthropology39(4): 496–499.
43.
WinthropR.H.1998b. “Tradition, Authenticity, and Dislocation: Some Dilemmas of Traditional Cultural Property Studies”Practicing Anthropology20(3): 25–27.
44.
ZolbrodP.G. 1992 (1984) Diné Bahani’: The Navajo Creation StoryAlbuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
