AndersonK., and SmithS.2001. “Editorial: Emotional Geographies”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers26(1): 7–10.
2.
BruyneelK.2007. “The Third Space of Sovereignty: The Postcolonial Politics of U.S.-Indigenous Relations”Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
ButzierS.R., and StevensonS.M.2013. “Indigenous peoples’ rights to sacred sites and traditional cultural properties and the role of consultation and free, prior, and informed consent” Paper presented at International Mining and Oil & Gas Law, Development, and Investment, Cartagena, Colombia, April 22–24, 2013 http://modrall.com/files/6427_IndigenousPeoplesRightsToSacredSitesAndTrad-itionalCulturalProperties.pdf
4.
ClokeP., and JohnstonR.2001. “Deconstructing human geography's binaries” in ClokeP., and JohnstonR. (eds) Spaces of Geographical Thought, pp. 1–20. London: Sage.
5.
CurtiG.H.2008. “From a wall of bodies to a body of walls: Politics of affect | Politics of memory | Politics of war”Emotion, Space and Society1: 106–118.
6.
CurtiG.H., DavenportJ., and JackiewiczE.2007. “Concrete Babylon: Life Between the Stars: To Dwell and Consume (with)in the Fold(s) of Hollywood, CA”Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers69: 45–73.
7.
DeloriaV.Jr.1994. God is Red, Golden: Fulcrum Publishing.
8.
FishA.2005. “Native American Sacred Places and the Language of Capitalism”Future Anterior2(1): 40–49.
9.
HuttS.2009. “The Evolution of Federal Agency Authority to Manage Native American Cultural Sites”George Wright Forum26(1): 45–56.
10.
KingT.F.2003. Places That CountWalnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
LusignanP.R.2009. “Traditional Cultural Places and the National Register”George Wright Forum26(1): 37–44.
13.
MassumiB.2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, SensationDurham: Duke University Press.
14.
MilhollandS.2010. “In the Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding and Resolving Incompatible Ideologies and Languages in US Environmental and Cultural Laws in Relationship to Navajo Sacred Lands”American Indian Culture and Research Journal34(2): 103–124.
15.
NPS(National Park Service, by the staff of the National Register of Historic Places) 1997. “National Register Bulletin: How to Define Categories of Historic Properties”U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington D.C.
16.
PabloM.2001. “Preservation as Perpetuation”American Indian Quarterly25(1): 18–20.
17.
ParkerP.L.1993. “Traditional Cultural Properties: What You Do and How We Think”CRM Special IssueNational Park ServiceWashington D.C.
18.
ParkerP.L., and KingT. F.1998. “Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties. National Register Bulletin 38.”U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington D.C.
19.
PeetR.2002. “There Is such a Thing as Culture”Antipode34(2): 330–333.
20.
ThorntonT.F.2009. “Anatomy of a Traditional Cultural Property: The Saga of Auke Cape”George Wright Forum26(1): 64–75.
21.
WainwrightJ., and RobertsonM.2003. “Territorialization, science and the colonial state: the case of Highway 55 in Minnesota”Cultural Geographies10(2): 196–217.
22.
WatkinsJ.2001. “Place-Meant”American Indian Quarterly25(1): 41–45.
23.
WinthropR.H.1998a. Contribution to Erlandson et al. “The Making of Chumash Tradition: Replies to Haley and Wilcoxon”Current Anthropology39(4): 496–499.
24.
WinthropR.H.1998b. “Tradition, Authenticity, and Dislocation: Some Dilemmas of Traditional Cultural Property Studies”Practicing Anthropology20(3): 25–27.