Internationally, neoliberalism is often associated with the export-oriented production of nontraditional agricultural goods from poorer to richer countries. Shrimp aquaculture is a very important aspect of this process. Economic geographers, sociologists, and others have critically analyzed the problems of shrimp farmers and the adverse environmental effects of shrimp aquaculture. But they have generally neglected a crucial dimension: the conditions under which men, women, and children work for a wage in producing shrimps. The story of shrimp culture has been, more or less, the story of the missing wage laborer. Drawing on in-depth interviews in India, this paper discusses the conditions of laborers in export-oriented shrimp culture. It shows how the export-oriented production of shrimps results in the reproduction of a working class that works for abysmally low wages and under very poor conditions. The exploitation and domination of aqualaborers happens in ways in which capitalist relations are mediated by place-specific relations of difference and the specificities of nature-dependent production.
AguiarL., and HerodA. eds. 2006. The dirty work of neoliberalism: cleaners in the global economy, Blackwell, Oxford.
2.
AliA.2006. ‘Rice to shrimp: land use land cover changes and soil degradation in Southwestern Bangladesh’,Land Use Policy, 23: 4, 421–435.
3.
BarkerC.2006. ‘Capital and revolutionary practice’,Historical Materialism, 14: 2, 55–82.
4.
BarracloughS., and Finger-StichA.1996. Some Ecological and Social Implications of Commercial Shrimp Farming in Asia, UN Research Institute for Social Development Paper #74
5.
BeltonB., and LittleD.2008. ‘The development of aquaculture in Central Thailand: Domestic demand versus export-led production’,Journal of Agrarian Change, 8: 1, 123–143.
6.
BoydW., PrudhamS., and SchurmanR.2001. ‘Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature’,Society and natural resources, 14: 7, 555–570.
7.
BrassT.2012. Labor regime change in the 21st century, Brill.
8.
BremanJ.1996. Footloose labor: working in India's informal economy, Cambridge University pressCambridge.
9.
BurkettP.1996‘Value, capital and nature: some ecological implications of Marx's critique of political economy’,Science and Society, 60: 3, 332–359.
10.
BushS.2008. ‘Contextualising fisheries policy in the Lower Mekong Basin’,Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 39: 3, 329–353.
11.
CarterB.1995. ‘A growing divide: Marxist class analysis and the labor process’,Capital & Class, 19: 1, 33–72.
12.
ChattopadhyayP.1998. ‘Value and exploitation: Marx's problem and Skillman's solution’,Science and Society, 62: 2, 218–240.
13.
DasR.2012a. ‘From labor geography to class geography: reasserting the Marxist theory of class’,Human Geography, 5: 1, 19–35.
14.
DasR.2012b. ‘Reconceptualizing capitalism: forms of subsumption of labor, class Struggle, and uneven development’,Review of Radical Political Economics, 44: 2, 178–200.
15.
DasR.2012c. ‘The dirty picture of neoliberalism’,Links: international journal of socialist renewal, http://links.org.au/node/2818
16.
FlahertyM., and KarnjanakesornC.1995. ‘Marine shrimp aquaculture and natural resource degradation in Thailand’,Environmental Management, 19: 1, 27–37.
17.
FracchiaJ.2008. ‘The capitalist labor-process and the body in pain: the corporeal depths of Marx's concept of immiseration’,Historical Materialism, 16: 4, 35–66.
18.
Government of India.2007. Rural Development Statistics: 2005–2006, National Institute of Rural DevelopmentHyderabad.
19.
GossJ., SkladanyM., MiddendorfG.2001. ‘Dialogue: Shrimp aquaculture in Thailand: A response to Vandergeest, Flaherty, and Miller’,Rural Sociology, 66, 451–460.
20.
GossJ., BurchD., and RicksonR.2000. ‘Agrifood restructuring and Third World transnationals: Thailand, the CP Group and the Global Shrimp Industry’,World Development, 28: 3, 513–530.
21.
HarveyD.1982. Limits to Capital, Chicago University PressChicago.
22.
HoustonI., and PulidoL.2000. ‘The work of performativity’,Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 401–424.
23.
IAA (Indian Aquaculture Authority).2001. Shrimp Aquaculture and the Environment—An Environment Impact Assessment Report, Available at: http://aquaculture.tn.nic.in/pdf/farming.pdf.
24.
IslamM.2009. ‘In search of “white gold”: environmental and agrarian changes in rural Bangladesh’,Society and Natural Resources, 22: 1, 66–78.
25.
KautskyK.1988. The Agrarian Question, Zwan PublicationsWinchester, Massachusetts.
26.
LebowitzM.2003. Beyond Capital: Marx's political economy of the working class, Palgrave MacmillanNew York.
27.
LeninV.1977. What is to be done?, in Selected Works, Vol. 1, Progress PublishersMoscow.
28.
Martinez-AlierJ.2001. ‘Ecological conflicts and valuation: mangroves versus shrimps in the late 1990s’,Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19: 5, 713–728.
29.
McDowellL.2001. ‘Father and Ford revisited: gender, class and employment change in the new millennium’,Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26: 4, 448–464.
30.
MarxK.1977. Capital, Vol. 1, Vintage, New York.
31.
MarxK.1976. Wage-labor and capital, International PublishersNew York.
32.
NeilandA., SoleyN., and VarleyJ.2001. ‘Shrimp aquaculture: economic perspectives for policy development’,Marine Policy, 25: 4, 265–279.
33.
OllmanB.2003. Dance of the Dialectic, University of Illinois PressUrbana.
34.
OdishaGovernment2005. District Statistical Handbook: Puri, Directorate of Economics and StatisticsBhubaneswar.
35.
OdishaGovernment2004. Odisha Human Development Report, Planning and Coordination DepartmentBhubaneswar.
36.
PatnaikU.2007. The republic of hunger and other essays, Tulika, Delhi.
37.
PeckJ., and TheodoreN.2001. ‘Contingent Chicago: Restructuring the Spaces of Temporary Labor’,International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25: 3, 471–496.
38.
PokrantB., and ReevesP.2007. ‘Work and labor in the Bangladesh brackish-water shrimp export sector’,South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 26: 359–389.
39.
PradhanD., and FlahertyM.2008. ‘National initiatives, local effects: Trade liberalization, shrimp aquaculture, and coastal communities in Odisha, India’,Society & Natural Resources, 21: 1, 63–76.
40.
RutherfordT.2010. ‘De/Re-centering work and class?: a review and critique of labor geography’,Geography Compass, 4: 7, 768–777.
41.
RutherfordT., and GertlerM.2002. ‘Labor in lean times: geography, scale and national trajectory of work place change’,Trans. of the Institute of British Geographers, 27: 2, 195–212.
42.
SamalK.2003. ‘Fishing communities on Chilika Lake’,Economic and Political Weekly, 38: 31, 3319–3325.
43.
StonichS., BortJ., and OvaresL.1997. ‘Globalization of shrimp mariculture: The impact on social justice and environmental quality in Central America’,Society & Natural Resources, 10: 2, 161–179
44.
Storper, and WalkerR.1989. The capitalist imperative, Blackwell, New York.
45.
VandergeestP., FlahertyM., and MillerP.1999. ‘A political ecology of shrimp aquaculture in Thailand’,Rural Sociology, 64: 4, 573–596.
46.
WattsM.1996. ‘Development III: The global agrofood system and late twentieth-century development, (or Kautsky redux)’,Progress in Human Geography, 20: 2, 230–245
47.
WeeksP.1992. ‘Fish and people—aquaculture and the social-sciences’,Society & Natural Resources, 5: 4, 345–357.
48.
World Bank.2007. World development report: agriculture for development, Washington D.C.
