This paper focuses on New Labour's policy towards the nuclear renaissance. It places this policy in the context of wider discussions on the democratic implications of the new constellations of governance emerging from the drive towards more sustainable futures. The paper identifies two crucial developments within the nuclear renaissance: firstly, the controversy surrounding the consultative process in 2006 and 2007; and secondly, the creation of new ‘efficient’ and ‘streamlined’ planning procedures through the establishment of the Planning Act 2008 and The Infrastructure and Planning Commission (IPC). The article builds on work which seeks to bring together questions of ‘democracy’ and ‘the political’ within discussions on ‘sustainability’. It argues that an understanding of these moments can only be properly established through an analysis of the wider discursive frame of ‘sustainability’ in which nuclear has been reinvented, and the way it has been utilized as a strategic tool of governing. The apparent ‘consensus’ on sustainability appears to foreclose discussions on multiple and divergent political imaginaries into a single shared vision. This is symptomatic of the wider conditions of the post-political and the post-democratic, where debate is reduced to managerial and technocratic particularities in which, regardless of public engagement, nuclear power becomes an ‘inevitability’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BadiouA. (2005) Metapolitics.London: Verso.
2.
BBC News. (2005) ‘Blair bid for backing on climate change’,BBC news [Online] 26th January. Available at: [Accessed 16th July, 2009]
BickerstaffK., LorenzoniI., PidgeonN., PoortingaW., and SimmonsP. (2008) ‘Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste’Public Understanding of Science, 17: pp 145–169.
7.
BlowersA. (2008) ‘Radioactive waste management and new Nuclear build – the ethical issues’, In DorfmanP. (Ed) Nuclear Consultation: Public trust in Government [Online] Available at: http://www.nuclearconsult.com/ pp 11–12 [Accessed 1st July, 2009], pp 27–32.
8.
BludhomI., WelshI. (2007) ‘Eco-politics beyond the Paradigm of Sustainability: A conceptual framework and research agenda’Environmental Politics, 16(2): pp 185–205.
9.
BurawoyM. (2003) ‘For a Sociological Marxism: The complementing Convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi.’,Politics and Society, 31(2): pp 193–261.
DTI. (2006c) ‘A n analysis of responses to the energy review consultation’ [Online] June, 2006. Available at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file31631.pdf [Accessed 12th July, 2009]
18.
DTI. (2006d) ‘Policy framework for new nuclear build: consultation document’ [Online] July, 2006. Available at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file31931.pdf [Accessed 11th July, 2009]
DTI. (2007b) ‘Meeting the Energy challenge: A white paper on Energy’ [Online] May, 2007. Available at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39564.pdf [Accessed 12th July, 2009]
21.
DorfmanP. (2008) ‘Executive summary’. In Dorfman, P. (Ed) Nuclear Consultation: Public trust in Government [Online] Available at: http://www.nuclearconsult.com/ pp 6–7 [Accessed 1st July, 2009]
22.
DurantR., FiorinoD., and O'LearyR. (2004) ‘Introduction’. In Durant, R. O'Leary, R. And Fiorno, D.(Ed's) Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities, pp 1–28.
23.
ElliotD (ed.) (2007) Nuclear or Not?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
ElliotD. (2007) ‘Introduction’. In ElliotD. (Ed) Nuclear or Not? Does nuclear power have a place in a sustainable energy future, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 1–6.
Grove-WhiteR., KearnsM., MacnaghtenP., and WynneB. (2006) ‘Nuclear futures: assessing public attitudes to new nuclear power’Political Quarterly, 77(2): pp 238–246.
JessopB. (2008) State Power.Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
LowryD. (2008) ‘Nuclear waste: The protracted debate in the UK’. In ElliotD. (Ed) Nuclear or not? Does nuclear power have a place in a sustainable energy future?, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 115–131.
PidgeonN., LorenzoniI., and PoortingaW. (2008) ‘Climate change or nuclear power – No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain’Global Environmental Change, 18: pp 69–85.
47.
RanciéreJ. (1995) On the Shores of Politics.London: Verso.
SwyngedouwE. (2007) ‘Impossible sustainability and the post-political condition’, In KruegerR., GibbsD. (Ed's) The Sustainable Development Paradox: urban political economy in the US and Europe.New York: Guilford Press, pp 13–40.
54.
SwyngedouwE. (2009) ‘The Antinomies of the Post-Political City: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production’,International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3): pp 601–620
