This mixed methods study investigates the experiences, perceptions, and understanding of teacher leadership among PK-12 educators engaged in developing course content for a graduate certificate program. Data were gathered through surveys and interviews of the participants (n = 8) with diverse backgrounds and experiences. The findings provide insights into collaborative course design, highlighting diverse processes and challenges. The study emphasizes the value of collaboration and underscores professional development’s transformative potential in shaping beliefs about teacher leadership. These findings demonstrate how co-design fosters meaningful professional growth, deepens understanding of teacher leadership, and supports the development of leadership capacities.
BarabS.LuehmannA. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10083
ComstockM.MargolisJ. (2021). “Tearing Down the Wall”: Making sense of teacher leaders as instructional coaches and evaluators. Journal of School Leadership, 31(4), 297–317.
6.
CosenzaM. N. (2015). Defining teacher leadership: Affirming the teacher leader model standards. Issues in Teacher Education, 24(2), 79–99.
7.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
8.
Darling-HammondL. (2015). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.
9.
DavisS. H.Darling-HammondL. (2012). Innovative principal preparation programs: What works and how we know. Planning and Changing, 43(1/2), 22–45.
10.
DavisS. H.LeonR. J. (2009). Teaching Gil to lead. Journal of School Leadership, 19(3), 266–298.
11.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
12.
EvansR. (1996). The human side of school change. Jossey-Bass.
13.
FairmanJ. C.MacKenzieS. V. (2015). How teachers influence others and understand their leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2014.904002
Gallo-FoxJ.ScantleburyK. (2016). Coteaching as professional development for cooperating teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.007
16.
GamoranA.BruchS. K. (2017). Educational inequality in the United States: Can we reverse the tide?. Journal of Education and Work, 30(7), 777–792.
GhamrawiN. (2013). Teachers helping teachers: A professional development model that promotes teacher leadership. International Education Studies, 6(4), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n4p171
19.
GonzalesS.LambertL. (2001). Teacher leadership in professional development schools: Emerging conceptions, identities, and practices. Journal of School Leadership, 11(1), 6–24.
20.
GrammensM.VoetM.VanderlindeR.DeclercqL.De WeverB. (2022). A systematic review of teacher roles and competences for teaching synchronously online through videoconferencing technology. Educational Research Review, 37, Article 100461.
21.
Granville-ChapmanK. (2016). Assessing the impact of a teacher leadership programme in a teaching schools alliance. The Journal of Teacher Action Research, 3(1), 51–75.
22.
GrissomJ. A.MitaniH.WooD. S. (2019). Principal preparation programs and principal outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(1), 73–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18785865
23.
HallingerP.KovačevićJ. (2021). Science mapping the knowledge base in educational leadership and management: A longitudinal bibliometric analysis, 1960 to 2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143219859002
HarrisonC.KillionJ. (2007). Ten roles for teacher leaders. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 74–77.
26.
HundalS.LevinD. M.KeselmanA. (2014). Lessons of researcher-teacher co-design of an environmental health afterschool club curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 36(9), 1510–1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.844377
27.
HunzickerJ. (2017). From teacher to teacher leader: A conceptual model. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 8(2), 1–27.
28.
IrgensG. A.HirschS.HerroD.MadisonM. (2023). Analyzing a teacher and research co-design partnership through the lens of communities of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, Article 103952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103952
29.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
30.
KamenouN. (2007). Methodological considerations in conducting research across gender, ‘race’, ethnicity and culture: A challenge to context specificity in diversity research methods. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(11), 1995–2010.
31.
KelterJ.PeelA.BainC.AntonG.DabholkarS.HornM. S.WilenskyU. (2020). Constructionist co-design: A dual approach to curriculum and professional development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, 1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13084
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
34.
MillerD.BorasiR.BorysZ.CallardC.CarsonC.OcchinoM. (2022). Teacher leaders’ roles, preparation, and impact in a district-wide digital conversion. In BondN. (Ed.), The power of teacher leaders: Their roles, influence, and impact (2nd ed., pp. 66–80). Routledge.
35.
NguyenD.HarrisA.NgD. (2020). A review of the empirical research on teacher leadership (2003-2017). Journal of Educational Administration, 58(1), 60–80. http://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2018-0023
36.
OrfieldG.LeeC. M. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality (Report). The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
37.
PanH-L. W.WiensP. D.MoyalA. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the teacher leadership scholarship. Teaching and Teacher Education121, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103936
38.
PenuelW. R.RoschelleJ.ShechtmanN. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 51–74.
39.
PetersV.SlottaJ. (2009). Co-designing curricula to promote collaborative knowledge construction in secondary school science. In O’MalleyC.SuthersD. D.ReimannP.DimitracopoulouA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer supportive collaborative learning (Vol. 1, pp. 204–213). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
40.
PoekertP.AlexandrouA.ShannonD. (2016). How teachers become leaders: An internationally validated theoretical model of teacher leadership development. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 21(4), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2016.1226559
RoschelleJ.PenuelW. R.ShechtmanN. (2006). Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. In BarabS. A.HayK. E.HickeyD. T. (Eds.), International conference of the learning sciences (pp. 606–612). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
43.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
44.
SancarR.AtalD.DeryakuluD. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, Article 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
45.
ScornavaccoK.KellyM. R.BoardmanA. (2022). Leading with curricular co-design: An exploration of teacher leadership through the co-design process. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 17(4), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751211017595
46.
SebastianJ.HuangH.AllensworthE. (2017). Examining integrated leadership in high schools: Connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1319392
47.
SeveranceS.PenuelW. R.SumnerT.LearyH. (2016). Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 531–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1207541
48.
ShenJ.WuH.ReevesP.ZhengY.RyanL.AndersonD. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31, Article 100357.
49.
ShieldsC. M.HesbolK. A. (2020). Transformative leadership approaches to inclusion, equity, and social justice. Journal of School Leadership, 30(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684619873343
50.
SmulyanL. (2016). Stepping into their power: The development of a teacher leadership stance. Schools: Studies in Education, 13(1), 8–28.
51.
SpikolD.MilradM.MaldonadoH.PeaR. (2009, July15–17). Integrating co-design practices into the development of mobile science collaboratories [Conference session]. 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Riga, Latvia.
52.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
VoogtJ.LaferriereT.BreuleuxA.ItowR. C.HickeyD. T.McKenneyS. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43(2), 259–282. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7
WeiR. C.Darling-HammondL.AndreeA.RichardsonN.OrphanosS. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
57.
WennerJ. A.CampbellT. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 134–171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478
58.
WiensP. D.BeckJ. S.HintonK.MoyalA. (2024). The complex web of teacher leadership: Examining the relationships between instructional support, shared leadership, and teacher satisfaction. The Educational Forum88(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2023.2207106
59.
WiensP. D.VongkulluksnV.BeckJ.PearsonB. (2025). Understanding teacher leadership: Development and testing of the Survey of Teacher Leadership. Social Sciences and Humanities Open12, 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101738
60.
York-BarrJ.DukeK. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255
61.
ZeivotsS.HopwoodN.WardakD.CramA. (2025). Co-design practice in higher education: Practice theory insights into collaborative curriculum development. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(3), 769–783.
