ChiaR. (1999). A “rhizomic” model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective from a metaphysics of change. British Journal of Management, 10, 209-227. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00128
4.
CunninghamK. M.Van GronigenB.TuckerP.YoungM. D. (2019). Using powerful learning experiences to prepare school leaders. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 14(1), 74-97.
CosnerS.De VotoC.‘Andry Rah’manA. (2018). Drawing in the school context as a learning resource in school leader development: Application-oriented projects in active learning designs. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13, 238-255. doi:10.1177/1942775118763872
7.
CosnerS.TozerS.ZavitkovskyP.WhalenS. (2015). Cultivating exemplary school leadership preparation at a research intensive university. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10, 11-38.
8.
DeVitaM. C. (2005). Getting the facts on school leadership preparation. In DavisS.Darling-HammondL.LaPointeM.MeyersonD. (Eds.), School leadership study: Developing successful principals. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Educational Leadership Institute.
9.
Eddy-SpicerD. H.JamesC. (2018). Boundary perspectives on schools as organizations. In ConnollyM.Eddy-SpicerD. H.JamesC.KruseS. D. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of school organization. London, England: Sage.
10.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44.
11.
JacksonB.KelleyC. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 192-212.
12.
LeithwoodK.SeashoreK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
13.
Lévi-StraussC. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
PerryJ. (Ed.). (2016). The EdD and Scholarly Practitioners: The CPED Path. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
15.
PeurachD. J. (2016). Innovating at the nexus of impact and improvement: Leading educational improvement networks. Educational Researcher, 45, 421-429. doi:10.3102/0013189x16670898
16.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book.
17.
WeickK. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652. doi:10.2307/2393339
18.
WinnK.YoungM. D. (2017, Spring). The UCEA program design network: Universities leveraging strengths of networked improvement communities. UCEA Review, 58(2), 1-5.
19.
WinnK.YoungM. D.Eddy-SpicerD. H. (2019). The UCEA program design network: Roles and opportunities for professional learning using improvement science. In CrowR.Hinnant-CrawfordB. N.SpauldingD. T. (Eds.), The education leader’s guide to improvement science: Data, design & cases for reflection. Gorham, ME: Myers Education Press.
20.
YoungM. D. (2015). The leadership challenge: Supporting the learning of all students. Journal of Leadership and Policy in Schools, 14, 389-410. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1073330
21.
YoungM. D.AndersonE.NashA. (2017). Preparing school leaders: Standards-based curriculum in the United States. Journal of Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16, 228-271. doi:10.1080/15700763.2017.1298812
22.
YoungM. D.CrowG. (2016). The handbook of research on the education of school leaders (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
YoungM. D.CrowG.MurphyJ.OgawaR. (2009). The handbook of research on the education of school leaders. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
YoungM. D.WinnK.ReedyM. (2017). The Every Student Succeeds Act: Strengthening the focus on educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53 (5), 705-726 doi:10.1177/0013161X17735871