Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-6
Expanding the Use of Educational Data for Social Justice: Lessons From the Texas Cap on Special Education and Implications for Practitioner–Scholar Preparation
Educational data offer a powerful tool for supporting equity. In this article, the authors call for a shift toward greater use of data in educator preparation programs. The authors motivate their proposal by highlighting findings from the Department of Education report released January 2018, which found that the Texas Education Agency systematically denied students special education services. The article outlines three basic metrics that stakeholders can use to identify potential noncompliance with the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. The authors describe other ways data can be used to promote equity and close with recommendations for educator preparation policy and practice.
AndersonE.WinnK. M.YoungM. D.GrothC.KorachS.PounderD.RorrerA. K. (2017). Examining university leadership preparation: An analysis of program attributes and practices. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(4), 375-397. doi:10.1177/1942775117735873
2.
ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE. B.TrentS. C.OsherD.OrtizA. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968–2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76, 279-299.
3.
BakerB. D.RamseyM. J. (2010). What we don’t know can’t hurt us? Equity consequences of financing special education on the untested assumption of uniform needs. Journal of Education Finance, 35, 245-275.
4.
BellD. A.Jr. (1980). Brown v. board of education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93, 518-533.
5.
BlanchettW. J. (2006). Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging the role of white privilege and racism. Educational Researcher, 35, 24-28.
6.
BlanchettW. J.KlingnerJ. K.HarryB. (2009). The intersection of race, culture, language, and disability implications for urban education. Urban Education, 44, 389-409.
7.
BooteD. N.BeileP. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.
8.
BowersA. J. (2016). Quantitative research methods training in education leadership and administration preparation programs as disciplined inquiry for building school improvement capacity. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12, 72-96. doi:10.1177/1942775116659462
9.
Brooks-GunnJ.DuncanG. J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. The Future of Children, 7, 55-71.
10.
BrownK. M. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 77-108.
11.
CardD.PayneA. A. (2002). School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 49-82.
12.
Darling-HammondL.LaPointeM.MeyersonD.OrrM. T.CohenC. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs (School Leadership Study. Final report). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
13.
DeMatthewsD.MawhinneyH. (2014). Social justice leadership and inclusion: Exploring challenges in an urban district struggling to address inequities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 844-881.
14.
DillD. D.MorrisonJ. L. (1985). EdD and PhD research training in the field of higher education: A survey and a proposal. The Review of Higher Education, 8, 169-186.
15.
HoweK. R.MiramontesO. (2015). The ethics of special education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
JacksonC. K.JohnsonR. C.PersicoC. (2015). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 157-218.
18.
Jean-MarieG.NormoreA. (2010). Educational leadership preparation: Innovation and interdisciplinary approaches to the Ed.D. and graduate education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
KnightD. S. (2017a). Are high-poverty school districts disproportionately impacted by state funding cuts? School finance equity following the Great Recession. Journal of Education Finance, 43, 169-194.
20.
KnightD. S. (2017b). Are school districts allocating resources equitably? The Every Student Succeeds Act, teacher experience gaps, and equitable resource allocation. Educational Policy, 33(4), 615-649. doi:10.1177/0895904817719523
21.
KnightD. S.DeMatthewsD. E. (2017). Assessing the educational opportunity of emergent bilingual students: Why are some state school finance systems more equitable than others? (CERPS Working Paper 2017-1). University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso.
22.
LochmillerC. R.LesterJ. N. (2017). Conceptualizing practitioner-scholarship for educational leadership research and practice. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(1), 3-25.
23.
MalenB. (2017). Enriching the preparation of education researchers and practitioner-scholars: Linking school district research priorities and university-based policy evaluation research courses. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12, 97-115.
24.
MaxwellJ. A. (2006). Literature reviews of, and for, educational research: A commentary on Boote And Beile’s “scholars before researchers”. Educational Researcher, 35(9), 28-31.
25.
MerchantB.GarzaE. (2015). The urban school leaders collaborative: Twelve years of promoting leadership for social justice. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(1), 39-62.
26.
OddenA. R.PicusL. O. (2014). School finance: A policy perspective (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
27.
O’MalleyM. P.CapperC. A. (2015). A measure of the quality of educational leadership programs for social justice: Integrating LGBTIQ identities into principal preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51, 290-330.
28.
OrfieldG.EatonS. E. (1996). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of education. New York, NY: The New Press.
29.
OrrM. T.BarberM. E. (2007). Collaborative leadership preparation: A comparative study of partnership and conventional programs and practices. Journal of School Leadership, 16, 709-739.
30.
RosenthalB. M. (2016). Denied: How Texas keeps tens of thousands of children out of special education. Houston Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.houstonchronicle.com/denied/1/
31.
SchuchL.CurtisA.DavidsonJ. (2017). Reducing lead exposure risk to vulnerable populations: A proactive geographic solution. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107, 606-624.
32.
ShulmanL. S.GoldeC. M.BueschelA. C.GarabedianK. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25-32.
33.
SkibaR. J.ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE. B.LosenD. J.HarryE. G. (2016). Risks and consequences of oversimplifying educational inequities: A response to Morgan et al. (2015). Educational Researcher, 45, 221-225.
34.
SullivanA. L. (2011). Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners. Exceptional Children, 77, 317-334.
ThroW. E. (1990). The third wave: The impact of the Montana, Kentucky, and Texas decisions on the future of public school finance reform litigation. Journal of Law and Education, 19, 219-250.
37.
TrujilloT.CooperR. (2014). Framing social justice leadership in a university-based preparation program: The University of California’s Principal Leadership Institute. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 9, 142-167.
