In this article, we report findings from an exploratory, qualitative study in which we used a constructivist lens to examine how two high school principals endeavored to develop the personal capacities of teachers and other leaders in their schools. We collected data from semistructured interviews with the principals and three other leaders from each of their respective schools. Through our findings, we illustrate the varying degree to which each principal viewed the leaders’ existing capacities, structured their leadership learning opportunities, guided their reflections, and assessed their learning in the context of leadership practice. An important finding was that the way the principals viewed leadership development and saw other leaders as learners themselves appeared to influence the way they developed other leaders’ personal capacities.
AnconaD. (2012). Sensemaking: Framing and acting in the unknown. In SnookS.NohriaN.KhuranaR. (Eds.), The handbook for teaching leadership: Knowing, doing and being (pp. 3-19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BoldenR. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 251-269.
3.
BredesonP. V. (1993). Letting go of outlived professional identities: A study of role transition and role strain for principals in restructured schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29, 34-68.
4.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA.DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
5.
Browne-FerrignoT.LindleJ. C. (2008, March). Developing instructional leadership teams in high schools: Potentialities, pitfalls, and other institutional lessons learned. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
6.
CoplandM. A.BoatrightE. (2006). Leadership for transforming high schools. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DanielsonC. (2006). Teacher leadership that strengthens professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10.
DimmockC. (2012). Leadership, capacity building and school improvement: Concepts, themes and impact. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
Drago-SeversonE. (2012). New opportunities for principal leadership: Shaping school climates for enhanced teacher development. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1-44.
12.
FrostD.HarrisA. (2003). Teacher leadership: Towards a research agenda. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 479-498.
13.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
14.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (2009). Distributed leadership in schools: Does system policy make a difference? In HarrisA. (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Studies in educational leadership (pp. 101-117). New York, NY: Springer.
16.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (2010a). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30, 95-110.
17.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (2010b). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement?Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38, 654-678.
18.
HarrisA. (2012). Distributed leadership: Implications for the role of the principal. Journal of Management Development, 31, 7-17.
19.
HarrisA.LeithwoodK.DayC.SammonsP.HopkinsD. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 337-347.
20.
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 626-658.
21.
KlarH. W. (2012). Fostering department chair instructional leadership capacity: Laying the groundwork for distributed instructional leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 15, 175-197.
22.
KlarH. W.HugginsK. S.HammondsH. L.BuskeyF. C. (2016). Fostering the capacity for distributed leadership: A post-heroic approach to leading school improvement. International Journal of Leadership Education, 19, 111-137. doi:10.1080/13603124.2015.1005028
23.
LeithwoodK.LouisK. S.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004, September). How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
LeithwoodK.MascallB.StraussT.SacksR.MemonN.YashkinaA. (2009). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. In LeithwoodK.MascallB.StraussT. (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 61-86). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
LiebermanA.FriedrichL. D. (2010). How teachers become leaders: Learning from practice and research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
27.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
LouisK. S.LeithwoodK.WahlstromK. L.AndersonS. E. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. Minneapolis: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota.
29.
LouisK. S.MayrowetzD.SmileyM.MurphyJ. (2009). The role of sensemaking and trust in developing distributed leadership. In HarrisA. (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (pp. 157-180). New York, NY: Springer.
30.
LumbyJ. (2013). Distributed leadership: The uses and abuses of power. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41, 581-597.
31.
ManginM. M. (2007). Facilitating elementary principals’ support for instructional teacher leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 319-357. doi:10.1177/0013161X07299438
32.
MargolisJ.HugginsK. S. (2012). Distributed but undefined: New teacher leader roles to change schools. Journal of School Leadership, 22, 953-981.
33.
MarionR.GonzalesL. D. (2014). Leadership in education: Organizational theory for the practitioner (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
34.
MascallB.LeithwoodK.StraussT.SacksR. (2009). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. In HarrisA. (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (pp. 81-100). New York, NY: Springer.
35.
MatsumuraL. C.SartorisM.BickelD. D.GarnierH. E. (2009). Leadership for literacy coaching: The principal’s role in launching a new coaching program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 655-693. doi:10.1177/0013161X09347341
36.
MayrowetzD. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 424-435.
37.
MayrowetzD.MurphyJ.LouisK. S.SmylieM. A. (2007). Conceptualizing distributed leadership as a school reform. In LeithwoodK.MascallB.StraussT. (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 167-195). New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
McLaughlinM. W.TalbertJ. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
MitchellC.SackneyL. (2011). Profound improvement: Building learning-community capacity on living system principles (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
MollerG.PankakeA. (2006). Lead with me: A principal’s guide to teacher leadership. New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
MurphyJ. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
43.
MurphyJ.SmylieM.MayrowetzD.LouisK. S. (2009). The role of the principal in fostering the development of distributed leadership. School Leadership & Management, 29, 181-214.
PattonM. P. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
PattonM. P. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
PrestineN.NelsonB. S. (2005). How can educational leaders support and promote teaching and learning? New conceptions of learning and leading in schools. In FirestoneW. A.RiehlC. (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 46-60). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
48.
RallisS. F.GoldringE. B. (2000). Principals of dynamic schools: Taking charge of dynamic schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
49.
RobinsonV. M. J. (2009). Fit for purpose: An educationally relevant account of distributed leadership. In HarrisA. (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (pp. 219-240). New York, NY: Springer.
50.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
52.
SpillaneJ. P.HalversonR.DiamondJ. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
53.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
TorranceD. (2014). Distributed leadership: Challenging five generally held assumptions. School Leadership & Management, 33, 354-372.
55.
WeickK. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652.
56.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
York-BarrJ.DukeK. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74, 255-316.
