Policies for principal preparation and licensure are important levers for improving school leadership. By developing a rubric of research-based practices, this University Council of Educational Administration study aims to provide a formative tool for policy makers. Using a policy analysis frame by Roach et al., this study explores the state code, rules and regulations, and accompanying state board/department of education documents to describe state policies for principal preparation program approval and candidate licensure. There is variation in the extent to which states have adopted policies in these areas. Proportionately, more states have adopted policies for licensure despite greater empirical evidence for preparation program approval.
BarnettB. G. (2005). Transferring learning from the classroom to the workplace: Challenges and implications for educational leadership preparation. Educational Considerations, 32, 6-16.
2.
BottomsG.O’NeillK.FryB.HillD. (2003). Good principals are the key to successful schools: Six strategies to prepare more good principals. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Educational Board. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED478010.pdf
3.
Browne-FerrignoT. (2003). Becoming a principal: Role conception, initial socialization, role-identity transformation, purposeful engagement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 468-503. doi:10.1177/0013161X03255561
4.
Browne-FerrignoT.MuthR. (2009). Candidates in educational leadership programs. In YoungM. D.CrowG. M.MurphyJ.OgawaR. T. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 195-224). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
CordeiroP. A.KruegerJ. A.ParksD.RestineN.WiltonP. T. (1993). Taking stock: Learnings gleaned from universities participating in the Danforth program. In MilsteinM. M. & Associates (Eds.), Changing the way we prepare educational leaders (pp. 17-38). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
6.
CordeiroP. A.SloanE. S. (1996). Administrative interns as legitimate participants in the community of practice. Journal of School Leadership, 6, 4-29.
DavisS.Darling-HammondL.MeyersonD.LaPointeM. (2005). Review of research. School leadership study. Developing successful principals. Palo Alto, CA: Educational Leadership Institute, Stanford University.
9.
DeeT. S.JacobB. (2011). The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 418-446. doi:10.3386/w15531
10.
EnglishF. W. (2006). The unintended consequences of a standardized knowledge base in advancing educational leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 461-472. doi:10.1177/0013161X06289675
11.
FiglioD.LoebS. (2011). School accountability. In HanushekE. A.MachinS.WoessmanL. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 383-421). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
12.
FinniganK. S. (2010). Principal leadership and teacher motivation under high-stakes accountability policies. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 161-189. doi:10.1080/15700760903216174
13.
FryB.BottomsG.O’NeillK.WalkerS. (2007). Schools need good leaders now: State progress in creating a learner-centered school leadership system. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.Retrieved from http://www.wallace.org
14.
FullerE. J.HollingworthL. (2014). A bridge too far? Challenges in evaluating principal effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 466-499. doi:10.1177/0013161x13506595
15.
GatesS. M.RingelJ. S.SantibanezL. (2003). Who’s leading our schols?: An overview of school administrators and their careers (No. 1679). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/trfulltext/u2/a416430.pdf
16.
GlasmanN.CibulkaJ.AshbyD. (2002). Program self-evaluation for continuous improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 257-288. doi:10.1177/0013161X02382008
17.
GrissomJ. A.MitaniH.BlissettR. S. (2015, April). Principal licensure exams and future job performance: Evidence from the School Leaders Licensure Assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Associate, Chicago, IL.
18.
HackmannD. G.RussellF. S.ElliottR. J. (1999). Making administrative internships meaningful. Planning & Changing, 30, 2-14.
19.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1996a). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980-1995. In LeithwoodK.ChapmanJ.CorsonD.HallingerP.HartA. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 723-783). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1573-2_22
20.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1996b). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44. doi:10.1177/0013161X9603200100
21.
HanushekE. A.RaymondM. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 297-327. doi:10.3386/w10591
22.
JacksonB. L.KelleyC. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 192-212. doi:10.1177/0013161X02382005
23.
KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2002). The promise and pitfalls of using imprecise school accountability measures. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 91-114. doi:10.1257/089533002320950993
24.
LathamA. S.PearlmanM. A. (1999). From standards to licensure: Developing an authentic assessment for school principals. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 245-262. doi:10.1023/A:1008169919434
25.
LeithwoodK.DayC.SammonsP.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2006). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning (Report No. 800). London, England: Department of Education. Retrieved from http://docplayer.net/storage/20/389895/389895.pdf
26.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 496-528. doi:10.1177/00131619921968798
27.
LeithwoodK.JantziD.CoffinG.WilsonP. (1996). Preparing school leaders: What works?Journal of School Leadership, 6, 316-342.
28.
McCarthyM. M. (2002). Educational leadership preparation programs: A glance at the past with an eye toward the future. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1, 201-221. doi:10.1076/lpos.1.3.201.7890
29.
MilitelloM.GajdaR.BowersA. J. (2009). The role of accountability policies and alternative certification on principals’ perceptions of leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 4, 30-66.
30.
MintropH. (2012). Bridging accountability obligations, professional values and (perceived) student needs with integrity. Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 695-726. doi:10.1108/09578231211249871
31.
MurphyJ. (2005). Unpacking the foundations of ISLLC standards and addressing concerns in the academic community. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 154-191. doi:10.1177/0013161X04269580.
32.
MurphyJ.MoormanH. N.McCarthyM. (2008). A framework for rebuilding initial certification and preparation programs in educational leadership: Lessons from whole-state reform initiatives. The Teachers College Record, 110, 2172-2203.
33.
MurphyJ.VriesengaM. (2004). Research on preparation programs in educational administration: An analysis. Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
34.
OrphanosS.OrrM. T. (2013). Learning leadership matters: The influence of innovative school leadership preparation on teachers’ experiences and outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42, 680-700. doi:10.1177/1741143213502187
35.
OrrM. T. (2011). Pipeline to preparation to advancement: Graduates’ experiences in, through, and beyond leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 114-172. doi:10.1177/0011000010378612
36.
OrrM. T.BarberM. E. (2007). Collaborative leadership preparation: A comparative study of innovative programs and practices. Journal of School Leadership, 16, 709-739.
37.
OrrM. T.OrphanosS. (2011). How graduate-level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and conventional leadership preparation programs for principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 18-70. doi:10.1177/0011000010378610
38.
PaulterA. (1990, November). A review of UCEA member institutions’ clinical experiences/internships/field experiences for educational leaders. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Pittsburgh, PA.
39.
PerezL. G.UlineC. L.JohnsonJ. F.James-WardC.BasomM. R. (2011). Foregrounding fieldwork in leadership preparation: The transformative capacity of authentic inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 217-257. doi:10.1177/0011000010378614
40.
RoachV.SmithL. W.BoutinJ. (2011). School leadership policy trends and developments: Policy expediency or policy excellence?Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 71-113. doi:10.1177/0011000010378611
41.
TannenbaumR. J. (1999). Laying the groundwork for a licensure assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 225-244.
U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Available from www.ed.gov
46.
VerslandT. M. (2013). Principal efficacy: Implications for rural “grow your own” leadership programs. Rural Educator, 35, 13-22
47.
WitziersB.BoskerR.KrugerM. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 398-425. doi:10.1177/0013161X03253411
48.
YoungM. D.CrowG. M.MurphyJ.OgawaR. T. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research on the education of school leaders. New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
YoungM. D.OrrM. T.TuckerP. D. (2012). Institutional and program quality criteria. Charlottesville, VA: University Council of Educational Administration.
