This exploratory study gathered information about the use of action research within doctor of education programs in educational leadership and explored faculty understanding of and perspectives on action research. Survey data established that action research is used infrequently to meet dissertation requirements. Contributing factors include lack of clarity regarding the nature of action research (AR) and concerns about methodological legitimacy. Because the development of collaborative leadership skills and the pursuit of social justice objectives are inherent to the action research process, these results call for additional discussion regarding this distinctive methodology and its role in the preparation of educational leaders at the doctoral level.
AndersonG. L. (2002). Reflecting on research for doctoral students in education. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 22-25.
2.
AndrewsR.GroganM. (2005). Form should follow function: Removing the Ed.D. dissertation from the Ph.D. strait jacket. UCEA Review, 47(2), 10-13.
3.
ArgyrisC. (1993). Knowledge for action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BoyerE. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
6.
CoghlanD.BrannickT. (2010). Doing action research in your own organization (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
FurmanG. (2011, November). School leadership, social justice, and action research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Pittsburgh, PA.
8.
FurmanG. (2012). Social justice leadership as praxis: Developing capacities through preparation programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 191-229.
9.
GayL. R.MillsG. E.AirasianP. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (8th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Merrill.
10.
GlassickC.HuberM.MaeroffG. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
GroganM.DonaldsonJ.SimmonsJ. M. (2007). Disrupting the status quo: The action research dissertation as a transformative strategy. In MullenC. A.CreightonT.DembowskiF. L.HarrisS. (Eds.), The handbook of doctoral programs in educational leadership: Issues and challenges (pp. 76-89). Houston, TX: The NCPEA Press.
13.
HerrK.AndersonG. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
HostetlerK. (2005). What is “good” education research?Educational Researcher, 34(6), 16-21.
15.
HoyW. K. (2010). Quantitative research in education: A primer. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
16.
JohnsenH. C. G. (2010). Scientific knowledge through involvement—How to do respectful othering. International Journal of Action Research, 6, 43-74. doi:10.1688/1861-9916_IJAR_2010_01_Johnsen
17.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
18.
MaurerM.GithensR. P. (2010). Toward a reframing of action research for human resource and organization development: Moving beyond problem solving and toward dialogue. Action Research, 8, 267-292. Retrieved from http://arj.sagepub.com./content/8/3/267
19.
MillsG. E. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Merrill.
20.
PageR. J. (2001). Reshaping graduate preparation in educational research methods: One school’s experience. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 19-25.
21.
PyrchT. (2007). Participatory action research and the culture of fear: Resistance, community, hope and courage. Action Research, 5, 199-216. Retrieved from http://arj.sagepub.com/content/5/2/199
22.
RiehlC.LarsonC. L.ShortP. M.ReitzugU. C. (2000). Reconceptualizing research and scholarship in educational administration: Learning to know, knowing to do, doing to learn. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 391-427.
23.
ShulmanL. S.GoldeC. M.BueschelA. C.GarabedianK. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25-32.
24.
StringerE. T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
YoungM. D. (2006). From the director: The M.Ed., Ed.D. and Ph.D. in educational leadership. UCEA Review, 45(2), 6-9.
27.
ZamboD. (2010). Action research as signature pedagogy in an education doctoral program: The reality and hope. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 261-271. doi:10.1007/s10755-010-9171-7
28.
ZeichnerK. (2001). Educational action research. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 273-283). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
