Much of the literature criticizing university-based school leadership preparation programs concludes that programs are, at best, reluctant to change, a conclusion often based more on anecdotal stories than a more systematic inquiry. This article provides evidence on the extent of change in programs since passage of the Standards for Advanced Programs in Educational Leadership in 2002. Chairs at National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education–accredited schools were surveyed to determine the nature and extent of adoption of design elements associated with effective programs. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to demonstrate that there has been wide-ranging change in university programs, and that the extent of this change does not depend on type of university or membership in University Council for Educational Administration.
BakerB. D.OrrM. T.YoungM. D. (2007). Academic drift, institutional production, and professional distribution of graduate degrees in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 279-318. doi:10.1177/0013161X07303320
2.
BauerS.BrazerS. (2012). Using research to lead school improvement: Turning evidence into action. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
3.
Broad Foundation and the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. (2003). Better leaders for America’s schools: A manifesto. Los Angeles, CA: Broad Foundation.
4.
Darling-HammondL.LaPointeM.MeyersonD.OrrM.CohenC. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
5.
DavisS.Darling-HammondL.LaPointeM.MeyersonD. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
6.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
7.
DonaldsonL. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
8.
Education Development Center. (2009). Principal preparation program quality self-assessment rubrics. Newton, MA: Author.
9.
EllisL. (1994). Research methods in the social sciences. Madison, WI: WC Brown and Benchmark Publishers.
10.
GodutoL. R.DoolittleG.LeakeD. (2008). Forming quality partnerships on a statewide level to develop quality school leaders. Theory Into Practice, 47, 345-352.
11.
GroganM.BredesonP.ShermanW.PreisS.BeatyD. (2009). The design and delivery of leadership preparation. In YoungM.CrowG.MurphyJ.OgawaR. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 395-416). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
HaleE.MoormanH. (2003). Preparing school principals: A national perspective on policy and program innovations. Washington, DC: IEL.
13.
JacksonB. L.KellyC. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 38, 192-212. doi:10.1177/0013161X02382005
14.
KochanF.JacksonB.DukeD. (Eds.). (1999). A thousand voices from the firing line. Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
15.
LeithwoodK.LouisK. S.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
16.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project.
17.
McCarthyM. M.KuhG. D. (1997). Continuity and change: The educational leadership professoriate. Columbus, MO: UCEA.
18.
MitgangL. (2008). Becoming a leader: Preparing principals for today’s schools. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
19.
MurphyJ. (1992). The landscape of leadership preparation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20.
MurphyJ.MoormanH. N.McCarthyM. (2008). A framework for rebuilding initial certification and preparation programs in educational leadership: Lessons from whole-state reform initiatives. Teachers College Record, 110, 2172-2203.
21.
OrrM. T. (2011). Pipeline to preparation to advancement: Graduates’ experiences in, through, and beyond leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 114-172.
22.
OrrM. T.OrphanosS. (2011). How graduate-level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and conventional leadership preparation programs for principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 18-70.
23.
OrrM. T.PounderD. (2011). Teaching and preparing school leaders. In ConleyS.CooperB. (Eds.), Finding, preparing, and supporting school leaders: Critical issues, useful solutions (pp. 11-40). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
PetersonK.FinnC. (1985). Principals, superintendents, and the administrator’s art. Public Interest, 79, 42-62.
25.
PetzkoV. (2008). The perceptions of new principals regarding the knowledge and skills important to their initial success. NASSP Bulletin, 92, 224-227.
26.
RobinsonV.LloydC.RoweK. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership type. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674.
27.
Southern Regional Education Board. (2003). School can’t wait: Accelerating the redesign of university principal preparation programs. Atlanta, GA: Author.
28.
WahlstromK.LouisK.LeithwoodK.AndersonS. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Executive summary. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
29.
Wallace Foundation. (2011). The school principal as leader: Guiding schools to better teaching and learning. New York, NY: Author.
30.
Wallace Foundation. (2012). The making of the principal: Five lessons in leadership training. New York, NY: Author.
