This case study presents a chronicle of events spanning a decade in Kentucky that led to state policy changes for principal preparation and details the response to those mandated changes by professors at the University of Kentucky. Professors’ collaborative efforts resulted in a new teacher leadership program and redesigned principal certification program that reflect characteristics of effective preparation programs described in literature. The article closes with lessons learned including a reflection by the author who was an active participant throughout the statewide and university redesign efforts.
BellamyT.FulmerC.MurphyM.MuthR. (2007). Principal accomplishments: How school leaders succeed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
2.
BjörkL.G. (2002, March). SAELP: Survey research summary report (Internal progress report for research team). Lexington: University of Kentucky.
3.
BjörkL. G.KeedyJ.RinehartJ. S.WinterP.A. (2002, April). State Action for Education Leadership Policy (SAELP) preliminary superintendent survey result: The principal search process (Research report submitted to the Kentucky Department of Education). Lexington: University of Kentucky.
4.
Browne-FerrignoT. (2003). Becoming a principal: Role conception, initial socialization, role-identity transformation, purposeful engagement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 468-503.
5.
Browne-FerrignoT. (2009). Case study: Kentucky. In FusarelliB. C.CooperB. S. (Eds.), The rising state: How state power is transforming our nation’s schools (pp. 27-45). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
6.
Browne-FerrignoT. (2011). Mandated university-district partnerships for principal preparation: Professors’ perspectives on required program redesign. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 735-756.
7.
Browne-FerrignoT.AllenL.W. (2006). Preparing principals for high-need rural schools: A central office perspective about collaborative efforts to transform school leadership. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21(1). Retrieved from http://www.jrre.psu.edu/articles/21-1.pdf
8.
Browne-FerrignoT.FusarelliB. C. (2005). The Kentucky principalship: Model of school leadership reconfigured by ISLLC Standards and reform policy implementation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 127-156.
9.
Browne-FerrignoT.LindleJ. C. (2006). Kentucky’s collaborative model for developing school leaders for rural high-need schools: Principals Excellence Program. In DanzigA.BormanK.JonesB.WrightW. (Eds.), Learner-centered leadership: Policy, research, and practice (pp. 171-186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Browne-FerrignoT.MuthR. (2004). Leadership mentoring in clinical practice: Role socialization, professional development, and capacity building. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 468-494.
11.
ClementsS. K.KannapelP. J. (2010). Kentucky’s march to the top: The past and future of education reform in Kentucky (White paper). Charleston, WV: Edvantia.
12.
Commonwealth Collaborative of School Leadership Programs. (2005, April). Leading change. Louisville, KY: LEAD.
13.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (1996). The Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium: Standards for school leaders. Washington, DC: Author.
14.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2008). Educational leadership policy standards: ISLLC 2008. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
DavisS.Darling-HammondL.LaPointeM.MeyersonD. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals (Review of research). Stanford, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute, Stanford University.
16.
DenzinN. K. (1999). Interpretive ethnography for the next century. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28, 510-519.
17.
Education Leadership Redesign Task Force. (2007). Learning-centered leadership: The preparation and support for the next generation of Kentucky’s school and district leaders. Frankfort, KY: Education Professional Standards Board.
18.
HarrisonC.KillionJ. (2007). Ten roles for teacher leaders. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 74-77.
19.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2009). National educational technology standards for administrators. Washington, DC: Author.
20.
Kentucky Cohesive Leadership System. (2008). Continuum for principal preparation development. Frankfort, KY: Author.
MurphyJ. (2003). Some notes on the foundations of the ISLLC Standards. AERA Division A Newsletter: School Leadership News, 5, 3-7.
23.
MuthR.Browne-FerrignoT.BellamyT.FulmerC.SilverM. (in press). Using teacher instructional leadership as a predictor of principal leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 23(1).
24.
OrrM. T.KingC.Pointe LaM. (2010, October). Districts developing leaders: Lessons on consumer actions and program approaches from eight urban districts (Research report). New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
25.
OrrM. T.PounderD. (2011). Teaching and preparing school leaders. In ConleyS.CooperB. S. (Eds.), Finding, preparing, and supporting school leaders: Critical issues, useful solutions (pp. 11-39). Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.
26.
PhillipsJ. C. (in press). Introduction to the JRLE special issue: State-mandated principal preparation program redesign: Impetus for reform or invitation to chaos?Journal of Research on Leadership Education.
27.
PrickettR. L.RichardsonM. D. (1992). The Kentucky Beginning Principal Intern Program. Catalyst for Change, 21(2), 20-23.
28.
Professional Certificate for Instructional Leadership (2008). School Principal, All Grades, Kentucky Administrative Regulations, 16 KAR 3:050 (1997, recodified from 704 KAR 20:710, 2002; eff. 10-13-08). Retrieved from http://www.lrc.ky.gov/kar/016/003/050.htmSchwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative research: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social construction. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
WhiteE. R.SwezigG. W. (1989). The Kentucky principal testing and internship program. Teacher Educator, 24(4), 21-28.
30.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
