Immersive,Interactive,Web-Enabled Computer Simulation as a Trigger for Learning: The Next Generation of Problem-Based Learning in Educational Leadership

Abstract

This paper describes the use of advanced computer technology in an innovative educational leadership program. This program integrates full-motion video scenarios that simulate the leadership challenges typically faced by principals over the course of a full school year. These scenarios require decisions that are then coupled to consequences and scored in the background to create a profile of learner strengths and needs. Because the content has been filmed in an operating school and because of the unique choice-consequence sequences, the immersive and interactive simulation triggers more potent learning than is possible with either previous paper-and-pencil or discussion-based techniques. The scenarios are embedded in a Web-enabled framework that facilitates the provision of individualized feedback tailored to the specific choices made by the learner, and supports the collection of multiple metrics that relate to the performance of the learner and the learning framework itself. Project Authentic Learning for Leaders (ALL) demonstrates the future of teaching and learning in either hybrid (face-to-face instruction plus digital teaching and learning) or in individual anywhere, anytime learning.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

B. D.

Orr

M. T.

Young

M. D.

(2007) Academic drift, institutional production and professional distribution of graduate degrees in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 279–318.

Bligh

Bleakley

(2006). Distributing menus to hungry learners: Can learning by simulation become simulation of learning? Medical Teacher, 28(7), 606–613.

Bridges

E. M.

Hallinger

(1991). Problem-based learning: A promising approach for preparing educational administrators. UCEA Review, 32(3), 3–8.

Bridges

E. M.

Hallinger

(1997). Using problem-based learning to prepare educational leaders. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 131–146.

Caldwell

O. W.

(1908). Editorial Notes. The Elementary School Teacher, 8(6), 344–346.

Christensen

C. M.

Horn

M. B.

Caldera

Soares

(2011, February). Disrupting college: How disruptive innovation can deliver quality and affordability to postsecondary education. Retrieved from Innosight Institute website: http://www.innosightinstitute.org/innosight/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/future_of_higher_ed-2.3.pdf.

Christensen

C. M.

Horn

M. B.

Johnson

C. W.

(2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Council of Chief State School Officers. (1996). Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium: Standards for School Leaders. Washington, DC: Author.

Council of Chief State School Officers. (2008). Educational Leadership Policy Standards. Washington, DC: Author.

10.

Dewey

(1932). How we learn. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

11.

Dexter

Tucker

P. D.

Stuit

(2009, April). The impact of instructors' case methods of instruction on students' learning experiences with cases. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from http://www.etips.info/docs/L2aCaseMethodsImpact.pdf.

12.

Gijbels

Dochy

Van den Bossche

Segers

(2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61. doi: 10.3102/00346543075001027.

13.

Hawley

(2010, June 9). The 2015 Report on Colleges of Education: Why Some Prospered, and Many Fell by the Wayside. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/06/09/33hawley.h29.html.

14.

Hmelo-Silver

C. E.

(2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

15.

Innosight. (2005). Disruptive innovation primer. Retrieved from Innosight website: http://www.innosight.com/documents/diprimer.pdf.

16.

Issenberg

S. B.

McGaghie

W. C.

Petrusa

E. R.

Gordon

D. L.

Scalese

R. J.

(2005). Features of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28.

17.

McGaghie

W. C.

(1999). Simulation in professional competence assessment: Basic considerations. In Tekian

McGuire

C. H.

McGaghie

W. C.

(Eds.), Innovative simulations for assessing professional competence: From paper-and-pencil to virtual reality (pp. 7–22). Chicago, IL: Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago.

18.

Schechter

(2011). Switching cognitive gears: Problem-based learning and success-based leaning as instructional frameworks in leadership education. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 143–165. doi: 10.1108/09578231111116707.

19.

Shoho

A. R.

(2011). Presidential Address: Rise? Or Demise? UCEA Review, 52(1), 1–8.