This article examines specific uses of video simulations in one educational leadership preparation program to advance future school and district leaders' skills related to public speaking and participation in televised news interviews. One faculty member and two advanced educational leadership candidates share their perspectives of several applications of advanced technologies, including one-on-one video simulations with the instructor and collaborative peer review of video portfolios. Finally, the authors provide links to multimedia examples of these digital artifacts from an advanced educational leadership course, titled Effective Practices: Media, Government & Public Communications, offered at the University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EdmonsonS. (2002). Effective internships for effective new administrators. Burlington, VT: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Burlington, VT.
EntmanR. M.RojeckiA. (2001). The Black image in the White mind: Media and race in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
FriendJ. (2009, April). Preparing educational leaders utilizing media technology: Applications for media, government & public communications learning. Paper presentation for the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association SIG: Learning and Teaching in Educational Leadership, San Diego, CA.
5.
GarmstonR. (1997, Fall). Can collaboration be taught? Journal of Staff Development, 18(4).
McDougallA.JonesA. (2006). Theory and history, questions and methodology: Current and future issues in research into ICT in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(3), 353–360.
8.
MilitelloM.GajdaR.BowersA. J. (2009). The role of accountability policies and alternative certification on principals' perceptions of leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 4(2), 30–66.
9.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2007, December 12). Educational leadership policy standards: ISLLC 2008. Retrieved from http://www.npbea.org/projects.php.
10.
PearceT. (2003). Leading out loud: Inspiring change through authentic communication. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
RedishT.WebbL.JiangB. (2005–2006). Design and implementation of a web-based portfolio for aspiring educational leaders: A comprehensive, evidence-based model. Educational Technology Systems, 34(3), 283–295.
12.
RovaiA. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319–332.
13.
TateJ. S.DunkleeD. R. (2005). Strategic listening for school leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14.
TomlinsonC. A. (2004). Differentiation in diverse settings: A consultants experiences in two similar school districts. School Administrator, 61(7), 28–31.
15.
TomlinsonC. A. (2008). The goals of differentiation. Educational Leadership, 66(3), 26–30.
16.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement. (2004). Innovations in education: Innovative pathways to school leadership. Washington DC: Author.
17.
WalkerD.LambertL. (1995). Learning and leading theory: A century in the making. In LambertL.WalkerD.ZimmermanD. P.CooperJ. E.LambertM. D.GardnerM. E.SlackP. J. F. (Eds.), The Constructivist Leader (pp. 1–27). New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
WhitakerK. S.KingR.VogelL. R. (2004). School district-university partnerships: Graduate student perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of a reformed leadership development program. Planning and Changing, 35(3–4), 209–222.
