A Tale of Two Forums: One Professor's Path to Improve Learning through a Common Online Teaching Tool

Abstract

As institutional and market pressures move more faculty into the online teaching space, renewed discussions are occurring about how to best teach online, and what features of online courses are best to employ. A distance learning staple, the online discussion, or asynchronous discussion forum (ADF) is an easy strategy for faculty to employ in an online course. However, tying ADFs to course goals, and ensuring they are deployed in ways that truly advance student learning is more difficult. This article provides an overview of ADFs and their role in the online teaching environment. The author reviews his own experiences with ADFs in a graduate educational administration course. Using a theoretical framework for quality distance education, the author critiques his own early efforts and subsequent improvements, ultimately providing a structure for other faculty to use as a model for their own ADF implementations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andresen

M. A.

(2009). Asynchronous discussion forums: Success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (1), 249–257.

Bernard

R. M.

Abrami

P. C.

Lou

Borokhovski

Wade

Wozney

Wallet

P. A.

Fiset

Huang

(2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.

Coppola

N. W.

Hiltz

S. R.

Rotter

N. G.

(2002). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169–189.

Dysthe

(2002). The learning potential of a web-mediated discussion in a university course. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 339–352.

Harlen

Doubler

2004. Can teachers learn through enquiry online? Studying professional development in science delivered online and on-campus. International Journal of Science Education, 26(10), 1247–67.

Rossen

(2010) Teaching Online: A Practical Guide. New York, NY: Routledge.

Linn

(1996). Cognition and Distance Learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science., 47(11), 826–842.

Machtmes

Asher

J. W.

(2000). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of telecourses in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 27–46.

Mazzolini

Maddison

(2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237–253.

10.

Means

Toyama

Murphy

Bakia

Jones

(2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.

11.

Parsad

Lewis

(2008). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2006–07 (NCES Publication 2009–044). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

12.

Ragan

(2007, August 15). Best Practices in Online Teaching. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/col10453/1.2/.

13.

Sitzman

Kraiger

Stewart

Wisher

(2006). The Comparative Effectiveness of Web-Based and Classroom Instruction: A Meta Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623–664.

14.

Swan

Shih

L. F.

(2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), Paper 8.

15.

Zhao

Lei

Yan

Lai

Tan

H. S.

(2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8).