Many states are mandating reforms in university-sponsored principal preparation programs, but faculty and school system personnel often have concerns about the prescriptive nature of state mandates related to these reforms. Auburn University served as one of four pilot principal preparation program redesigns in Alabama, a process that took over two years. Redesign efforts involved negotiating state requirements, faculty needs and research interests, school district needs and interests, best practices, and common sense. The re-design was developed and is being implemented in partnership with seven school districts. In this article we interrogate the issues, challenges, and successes faced throughout one university's principal preparation program redesign process, offering reflections, insights, and lessons learned for others currently engaged or soon to be negotiating competing agendas for how they should prepare principals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsK. A. (2002). What colleges and universities want in new faculty. Preparing future faculty occasional paper series. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities and Council of Graduate Schools.
2.
AndersonG. L. (2001). Disciplining leaders: A critical discourse analysis of the ISLLC national examination and performance standards in educational administration. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 199–216.
3.
Author (2002). The exploitative working conditions. Peer Review, 5 (1), 3.
4.
BlackW. R.MurtadhaK. (2007). Toward a signature pedagogy in educational leadership preparation and program assessment. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 2(1). Retrieved [August 12, 2008], from http://www.ucea.org/JRLE/pdf/vol2/Black_Murtadha%20PDF.pdf
5.
BlackmoreJ. (2008, October/November). Democratic leadership: Redesigning schools for social justice. Presentation at the 22nd annual meeting of the University Council of Educational Administration, Orlando, Florida.
6.
BrownK. M. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 79–110.
7.
Cambron-McCabeN. H. (2003). Rethinking leadership preparation: Focus on faculty learning communities. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2 (4), 285–298.
8.
CoxG. S. (2007). Standards for school leaders: Considering historical, political, and national organizational influences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn University.
9.
Darling-HammondL.LaPointeL.MeyersonD.OrrM. T. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from Exemplary Leadership Development Program. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute. Retrieved [date], from The Wallace Foundation web site: www.wallacefoundation.org
10.
EnglishF. W. (2003). Cookie-cutter leaders for cookie-cutter schools: The teleology of standardization and the de-legitimization of the university in educational leadership preparation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2(1), 27–46.
11.
EnglishF. W. (2006). The unintended consequences of a standardized knowledge base in advancing educational leadership programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 461–472.
12.
FriedmanT. L. (2008). Hot, flat and crowded. Picador: New York.
13.
GaleTDensmoreK. (2003). Democratic educational leadership in contemporary times. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(2), 119–136.
14.
GriffithsD. E.StoutR. T.ForsythP. B. (Eds.). (1988). Leaders for America's schools: The report and papers of the National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration. Berkeley, CA: McCutcham.
15.
GroganM.AndrewsR. (2002). Defining preparation and professional development for the future. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 233–256.
16.
HellerR.ConwayJ.JacobsenS. (1988, September). Here is your blunt critique of administrator preparation. Executive Educator, 10(9), 18–21.
17.
JacksonB. L.KelleyC. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 192–212.
18.
KezarA.CarducciR. (2007). Cultivating revolutionary educational leaders: Translating emerging theories into action. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 2(1). Retrieved [October 25, 2008], from http://www.ucea.org/JRLE/pdf/vol2/kezar.pdf
19.
KochanF.ReedC. (2005). Collaborative leadership, community building, and democracy in public education. In Fenwick English (Ed.), The Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research and practice (pp. 68–84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20.
KochanF. K.ReedC. J.TwaleD. J.JonesV. C. (1998). Restructuring an educational leadership program: A journey from organization to community. In RichardsonM. (Ed.), Southern Regional Council of Educational Administration 1998 Yearbook. Statesboro, GA: Georgia Southern University.
21.
LaMagdeleineD.MaxcyB. D.PounderD. G.ReedC. J. (2009). The Context of University-Based Educational Leadership Preparation. (pg. 129–156) In YoungM.CrowG.MurphyJ.OgawaR. (Eds.), Handbook on Leadership Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project.
23.
LivingstonM.DavisL.GreenR. L.DeSpainB. C. (2001). Strengthening the professorial role through collaboration: A guide to school administrators. Education, 122(1), 135–140.
24.
MilsteinM. M. (1992, October/November). The Danforth Program for the Preparation of School Principals (DPPSP) six years later: What we have learned. Paper presented at the annual conference of the University Council for Educational Administration, Minneapolis, MN.
25.
MurphyJ. (1992). The landscape of leadership preparation: Reframing the education of school administrators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
26.
MurphyJ. (2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 176–191.
MurphyJ.ForsythP. B. (1999). Educational administration: A decade of reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29.
MurphyJ.HallingerP. (1987). Approaches in administrative training. Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
MuseI.ThomasG. (1991). The rural principal: Select the best. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 4(3), 32–37.
31.
MuthR.BarnettB. (2001). Making the case for professional preparation: Using research for program improvement and political support. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 13, 109–120.
32.
PetersonK. D.FinnC. E. (1985). Principals, superintendents, and the administrator's art. The Public Interest, 79, 42–62.
33.
PounderD. G.YoungM.ReitzugU. (2002). Restructuring the preparation of school leaders. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 261–288). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education/University of Chicago Press.
34.
ReedC. J.ZhuL.SpencerW. (2008). Survey of leadership in Alabama schools. Unpublished monograph, Auburn University.
35.
ScheurichJ. J.SkrlaL. (2003). Leadership for equity and excellence: Creating high-achievement classrooms, schools, and districts. Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks.
Southern Regional Education Board. (2007). Schools need good leaders now: State progress in creating a learner-centered school leadership system. Atlanta, GA: Author.
38.
TheoharisG. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 221–258.
39.
TwaleD. J.ReedC. J.KochanF. K. (2001). Creating collaborative communities for part time students in educational leadership programs. Planning and Changing, 32(3 & 4): 214–225.
40.
Wallace Foundation. (2008). Becoming a leader: Preparing school principals for today's schools. Retrieved [date] from, www.wallacefoundation.org
41.
YoungM. (2006). The M.Ed., Ed.D., and Ph.D. in Educational Leadership, UCEA Review, 45(2), 6–9.
42.
YoungM. D.PetersenG.T. (Eds.). (2002). Ensuring the capacity of university-based educational leadership preparation: The collected works of the National Commission for the Advancement of Educational Leadership Preparation [Special Issue]. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2).
43.
YoungM. D.PetersenG.ShortP. (2002). The Complexity of substantive reform: A call for interdependence among key stakeholders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 137–17
