AndersonG. L. (2001). Disciplining leaders: A critical discourse analysis of the ISLLCnational examination and performance standards in educational administration. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 199–216.
2.
Browne-FerrignoT.MuthR. (2004). Leadership mentoring in clinical practice: Role socialization, professional development, and capacity building. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 468–494.
3.
CicchelliT.MarcusS.WeinerM. (2002). Superintendents' dialogue in a professional development model. Education and Urban Society, 34(4), 415–421.
4.
DantleyM. E. (2003). Purpose-driven leadership: The spiritual imperative to guiding schools beyond high-stakes testing and minimum proficiency. Education and Urban Society, 35(3), 273–291.
5.
EnglishF. W. (2003). Cookie-cutter leaders for cookie-cutter schools: The teleology of standardization and the de-legitimization of the university in educational leadership preparation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2(1), 27–46.
6.
EnglishF. W. (2006). The unintended consequences of a standardized knowledge base in advancing educational leadership programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 461–472.
7.
GaleTDensmoreK. (2003). Democratic educational leadership in contemporary times. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(2), 119–136.
8.
GornitzkaA. (1999) Governmental policies and the organizational change in higher education. Higher Education, 38(1), 5–31.
9.
GroganM.AndrewsR. (2002). Defining preparation and professional development for the future. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 233–256.
10.
HoyW.MiskelC. (2005). Educational administration: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
11.
KochanF.ReedC. (2005). Collaborative leadership, community building, and democracy in public education. In Fenwick English (Ed.). The Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research and practice. (pp. 68–84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
12.
KottkampR. B.SilverbergR. P. (2003). Leadership preparation reform in first person: Making assumptions public. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2(4), 299326.
13.
LincolnY. S. (1989). Critical Requisites for Transformational Leadership: Needed Research and Discourse. Peabody Journal of Education, 66(3), 176–181.
14.
Martin, J., Samels, J. E., & Associates (1997). First among equals: The role of the chief academic officer. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
15.
MurphyJ. (2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints, Educational Administration Quarterly, (38) 176–191.
16.
OrrM. T. (2006). Mapping innovation in leadership preparation in our nation's schools of education. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(7), 492–499.
17.
PattonM. Q. (1996, spring/summer). A world larger than formative and summative. Evaluation Practice, (17)2, 331–345.
18.
PounderD. G. (2006). Leader preparation research and reform agendas: A response to charting the changing landscape. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), Preparing school leaders: Defining a research and action agenda (pp. 87–92). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
19.
PounderD. G.YoungM.ReitzugU. (2002). Restructuring the preparation of school leaders. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 261–288). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education/University of Chicago Press.
20.
ReedC.KochanF.RossM. E.KunkelR. C. (2001, spring). Designing evaluation systems that inform, reform, and transform professional development schools. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision (16)3, 188–205.
21.
SandersJ. R. (2001). A vision for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, (22)3, 363–366.
22.
SengeP.Cambron-McCabeN.LucasT.SmithB.DuttonJ.KleinerA. (2001). Schools that learn. Doubleday, New York, NY.
Southern Regional Education Board. (2007). Schools need good leaders now: State progress in creating a learner-centered school leadership system. Atlanta, GA: Author.
25.
WilmoreE.L. (2002). Principal Leadership: Applying the New Education Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC) Standards. Corwin Press, Inc: Thousand Oaks, CA.
26.
WolvertonM.GmelchW. H.MontezJ.NiesC. T. (2001). The changing nature of the academic deanship. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Vol. 28(1).
27.
YoungM. (2006). The M.Ed., Ed.D., and Ph.D. in Educational Leadership, UCEA Review, (45)2, 6–9.
28.
YoungM. D.PetersenG. J.ShortP. M. (2002). The Complexity of substantive reform: A call for interdependence among key stakeholders. Educational Administration Quarterly (38)2, 137–1