The purpose of this study was to examine group dynamics of educational leadership students in cohorts and make comparisons with the group dynamics characteristics of non-cohort students. Cohorts have emerged as dynamic and adaptive entities with attendant group dynamic processes that shape collective learning and action. Cohort (n=42) and non-cohort (n=51) students were surveyed on group variables of participation, communication, influence, trust, cohesiveness, empowerment, collaboration, and satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and effect size analyses were used for data analysis. Significant differences were identified in trust, cohesiveness, and satisfaction. However, findings show little effect on cohort structures in the areas of participation, communication, influence, empowerment, and collaboration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderM. (1985). The team effectiveness critique. In GoodsteinL. D.PfeifferJ. W. (Eds.), The 1985 Annual: Developing Human Resources (pp. 101–106). San Diego, CA: University Associates.
2.
American Psychological Association (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
AndersonC. M.MartinM. M. (1995). Why employees speak to coworkers and bosses: Motives, gender, and organizational satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 32(3), 249–265.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York: Freeman.
5.
BarnettB. G.BasomM. R.YerkesD. M.NorrisC. J. (2000). Cohorts in educational leadership preparation programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 255–282.
6.
BarnettB. G.MuseI. D. (1993). Cohort groups in educational administration: Promises and challenges. Journal of School Leadership, 3, 400–415.
7.
BasomM.YerkesD.NorrisC.BarnettB. (1996). Using cohorts as a means for developing transformational leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 6(1), 99–112.
8.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Browne-FerrignoT.MuthR. (2001, November). Issues related to the effects of cohorts on learners. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Cincinnati, OH.
10.
BurnafordG.HobsonD. (1995). Beginning with the group: Collaboration as the cornerstone of graduate teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 17(3), 67–75.
11.
BurnsF.GraggR. L. (1981). Brief diagnostic instruments. The 1981 Annual handbook for group facilitators, San Diego: University Associates, pp. 87–94.
12.
CarronA. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123–138.
13.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
CohenS. G.BaileyD. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.
15.
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
16.
DeutschM. (1973). The resolution of conflict.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
DonaldsonJ. F.ScribnerJ. P. (2003). Instructional cohorts and learning: Ironic uses of a social system. Journal of School Leadership, 11, 644–655.
18.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (1999). The intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model of crowd behaviour. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 1–22.
19.
DurdenP. C. (2006). Creating connectivity: An urban collaboratory for preparation and practice in educational leadership. In DembowskiF. L.LemastersL. (Eds.), Unbridled Spirit: Best Practices in Educational Administration–The 2006 Yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA). Lancaster, PA: Pro-Active Publications.
20.
EvansC. R.DionK. L. (1991). Group cohesion and group performance: a meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22(2), 175–186.
21.
FestingerL.SchachterS.BackK. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing.New York: Harper.
22.
FisherB. A.EllisD. G. (1990). Small group decision making: Communication and the group process (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
23.
ForsythD. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole-Wadsworth.
24.
GrossN.MartinW. E. (1952). On group cohesiveness. American Journal of Sociology, 57, 546–554.
25.
HechtM. (1978). Measures of communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4, 350–368.
26.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis.New York: Academic Press.
27.
HillM. S. (1995). Educational leadership cohort models: Changing the talk to change the walk. Planning and Changing, 26(3/4), 179–189.
28.
HillM. S.RaglandJ. (1995). Women as educational leaders: Opening windows, pushing ceilings.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
29.
HirokawaR. Y. (1988). Group communication and decision-making performance: A continued test of the functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 14, 487–515.
30.
HogartyK. Y.KromreyJ. D. (2001, April). We've been reporting some effect sizes: Can we guess what they mean? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
31.
HoggM. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85–111.
32.
JacksonB. L.KelleyC. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 192–212.
33.
JanisI. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
34.
JanisI. L.MannL. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment.New York: Free Press.
35.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonF. P. (2003). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
KirmeyerS. L.LinT. (1987). Social support: Its relationship to observed communication with peers and superiors. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 138–151.
37.
LarsonC. E.LaFastoF. M. J. (1989). Team Work, What Must Go Right: What Can Go Wrong.Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.
38.
LeithwoodK.JantziD.CoffinG. (1995). Preparing school leaders: What works.Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
39.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders.Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project.
40.
MaherM. A. (2005). The evolving meaning and influence of cohort membership. Innovative Higher Education, 30(3), 195–211.
41.
MalnightT. (1989). GE — Preparing for the 1990's.Boston: HBS.
42.
MathieuJ. E.GilsonL. L.RuddyT. M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 97–108.
43.
McClureB. A. (2005). Putting a new spin on groups: The science of chaos (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
McGrathJ. E. (1984) Groups: Interaction and performance.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
45.
MerriamS. B.CaffarellaR. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
MullenB.CopperC. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 115, 210–227.
47.
MurphyJ. (1993). Alternative designs: New directions. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), Preparing tomorrow's school leaders: Alternative designs (pp. 225–253). University Park, PA: University Council for Educational Administration.
48.
National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration (1987) Leaders for America's Schools.Tempe, AZ: University Council for Educational Administration.
49.
NorrisC.BarnettB. (1994, October). Cultivating a new leadership paradigm: From cohorts to communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Philadelphia, PA.
50.
NortonM. (1995). The status of student cohorts in educational administration preparation programmes.Tempe: Arizona State University, Division of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies.
51.
OwenW. F. (1985). Metaphor analysis of cohesiveness in small discussion groups. Small Group Behavior, 16(3), 415–424.
52.
PorterA. C. (1987). Teacher collaboration: new partnerships to attack old problems. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(2), 147–152.
53.
RosenfeldL. B.GilbertJ. R. (1989). The measurement of cohesion and its relationship to dimensions of self-disclosure in classroom settings. Small Group Research, 20(3), 291–301.
54.
RosenthalR. (2000). Effect sizes in behavioral and biomedical research: Estimation and interpretation. In BickmanL. (Ed.), Validity & social experimentation (pp. 121–139). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
55.
Sapon-ShevinM.Chandler-OlcottK. (2001). Student cohorts: Communities of critique or dysfunctional families?Journal of Teacher Education, 52(5), 350–64.
56.
SchulzA. J.IsraelB. A.LantzP. M. (2003). Instrument for Evaluating Dimensions of Group Dynamics Within Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26(3), 249–262.
57.
ScribnerJ. P.DonaldsonJ. F. (2001). The dynamics of group learning in a cohort: From nonlearning to transformative learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 605–636.
58.
SeashoreS. E.LawlerE. E.III, MirvisP. H.CammannC. (1983). Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures and practices.New York: Wiley.
59.
SengeP.KleinerA.RobertsC.RossR. B.SmithB. J. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization.New York: Doubleday.
60.
ShawM. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
61.
SheaG. P.GuzzoR. A. (1987). Groups as human resources. In RowlandK. M.FerrisG. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 5, pp. 323–356). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
62.
StokesJ. P. (1983). Components of group cohesion: Intermember attraction, instrumental value, and risk taking. Small Group Behavior, 14, 163–173.
63.
TareiloJ. (2007, June 18). The road to successfully completing the doctoral studies: A tale of a cohort model. Retrieved date, from http://cnx.org/content/m14600/1.1/.
64.
TeitelL. (1997). Understanding and harnessing the power of the cohort model in preparing educational leaders. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 66–85.
65.
ThanosH. (1990). School-based teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 15(1), 4–38.
66.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776–244.
67.
ToselandR. W.RivasR. F. (2001). An introduction to group work practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
68.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.TurnerP. J.SmithP. M. (1984). Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 97–111.
69.
VaskeJ. J.GlinerJ. A.MorganG. A. (2002). Communicating judgments about practical significance: Effect size, confidence intervals and odds ratios. Human dimensions of Wildlife, 7, 287–300.
70.
WhitakerK. S.KingR.VogelL. R. (2004). School district-university partnerships: Graduate student perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of reformed leadership development program. Planning and Changing, 35(3&4), 209–222.
71.
YoungM.BrewerC. (2008). Fear and the preparation of school leaders: The role of ambiguity, anxiety, and power in meaning making. Educational Policy, 22(1), 106–129.
72.
ZaccaroS. J.McCoyM. C. (1988). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 837–851.
73.
ZandD. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229–239.
74.
ZanderA. (1982). Making groups effective.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
