The Role of Accountability Policies and Alternative Certification on Principals' Perceptions of Leadership Preparation

Abstract

This study reports on findings from a survey of Massachusetts' school principals that examined their perceptions of the nature and quality of certification programs. Results indicate that when participants were certified (pre or post NCLB) and where they were certified (public, private, alternative programs) has a significant influence on the perceived content and quality of their preparation. These findings reveal that accountability measures may have led to changes in the content and structure of principal preparation programs over time and suggest a need for state standards that influence the development, delivery, and evaluation of principal preparation programs to reflect the requisite skills principals need and want in the 21^st century.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnett

B. G.

Basom

M. R.

Yerkes

D. M.

Norris

C. J.

(2000). Cohorts in educational leadership preparation programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 255–282.

Beaudin

B. Q.

Thompson

J. S.

Jacobson

(2002, April). The administrator paradox: More certificated, fewer apply. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Brown-Ferrigno

Muth

(2004). Leadership mentoring in clinical practice: Role socialization, professional development, and capacity building. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 468–494.

Copland

M. A.

(2000). Problem-based learning and prospective principals’ problem-framing ability. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 585.

Cordeiro

Sloan

E. S.

(1996). Administrative interns as legitimate participants in the community of practice. Journal of School Leadership, 6.

Daresh

(2004). Mentoring school leaders: Professional promise or predictable problems. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 495.

Darling-Hammond

LaPointe

Meyerson

Orr

(2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.

Deal

T. E.

Peterson

(1998). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Educational Research Service. (2000). The principal, keystone of a high-achieving school: Attracting and keeping the leaders we need. Arlington, VA: Author.

10.

Ellis

J. C.

(2002). A study of the internship component of the innovative leadership program at the University of Alabama from 1994 to 2000. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama—Tuscaloosa.

11.

Farkas

Johnson

Duffet

(2003). Rolling up their sleeves: Superintendents and principals talk about what's needed to fix public schools. New York, NY: Public Agenda.

12.

Fink

Brayman

(2006). School leadership succession and the challenges of change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 62–89.

13.

Forsyth

P. B.

Smith

T. O.

(2002, April). Patterns of principal retention: What the Missouri case tells us. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

14.

Fuller

Orr

Young

(2008). The revolving door of the principalship. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from http://www.ucea.org/storage/pdf/ImplicationsMar2008.pdf.

15.

Gronn

(2002). Distributed leadership. In Leithwood

Hallinger

(Eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (pp. 653–696). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

16.

Gronn

Rawling-Sanaei

(2003). Principal recruitment in a climate of leadership disengagement. Australian Journal of Education, 47(2), 172–185.

17.

Hackmann

Wanat

(2007). Licensing principals: Iowa's preparation reform initiative. Journal of Research in Leadership Education, 2(3), 1–36.

18.

Hale

E. L.

Moorman

H. N.

(2003). Preparing school principals: A national perspective on policy and program innovations. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.

19.

Hallinger

Heck

(1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Education Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.

20.

Heller

R. W.

Conway

J. A.

Jacobson

S. L.

(1988). Here's your blunt critique of administrator preparation. Executive Educator, 10(9), 21–22.

21.

Hess

Kelly

A. P.

(2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal-preparation programs. Teachers College Record, 109(1), 244–274.

22.

Jolly

R. A. F.

(1995). The effectiveness of secondary educational administration preparation programs at Kansas Regents universities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56 (4224), 11A. (UMI No. 960958).

23.

Lawes

L. G.

(2008). A descriptive case study examining the perceptions of novice urban high school principals regarding how well their graduate educational leadership programs prepared them to implement the Connecticut Standards for School Leaders. Dissertation Abstracts International, 69 (306), 03A. (UMI No. 3305574).

24.

Leithwood

Jantzi

Coffin

Wilson

(1996). Preparing school leaders: What works? Journal of school leadership, 6(3), 316–342.

25.

Leithwood

Prestine

(2002). Unpacking challenges of leadership at the school and district level. In Murphy

(Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century: One hundred-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 42–64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

26.

Leithwood

Seashore Louis

Anderson

Wahlstrom

(2005). How leadership influences student learning. New York: The Wallace Foundation.

27.

Leithwood

Wahlstrom

(2008). Linking leadership to student learning: Introduction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 455–457.

28.

Levine

(2005). Educating school leaders. Retrieved May 12, 2007, from http://www.edschools.org/pdf/Final313.pdf.

29.

Lindle

(2004). Trauma and stress in the principal's office: Systemic inquiry as coping. Journal of School Leadership, 14(4), 378–410.

30.

Macmillian

(2000). Leadership succession cultures of teaching and educational change. In Hargreaves

Bascia

(Eds.), The sharp edge of educational change (pp. 58–71). London: Falmer.

31.

March

J. G.

(1978). American public school administration: A short analysis. School Review, 86(2), 217–250.

32.

Martin

T. P.

(2002). The perception of middle-level school assistant principals regarding their administrative preparation and the tasks they perform. Dissertation Abstracts International, 3 (2760), 08A. (UMI No. 3061301).

33.

Marzano

R. J.

Waters

McNulty

(2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

34.

Massachusetts Department of Education. (2003). Commonwealth School Leadership Project report. Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education.

35.

Matthews

J. L.

Crow

(2003). Being and becoming a principal: Role conceptions for contemporary principals and assistant principals. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

36.

McCarthy

(2002). Educational leadership preparation programs: A glance at the past with an eye toward the future. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(3), 201–221.

37.

Mitgang

L. D.

(2003). Beyond the pipeline: Getting the principals we need, where they are needed most. New York: The Wallace Foundation.

38.

Murphy

(2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. In Murphy

(Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

39.

Murphy

(2003). Reculturing educational leadership: The ISLLC Standards ten years out. Fairfax, VA: National Policy Board for Educational Administration.

40.

Murphy

Orr

(2009). Industry standards for preparation programs in educational leadership. Learning & Teaching in Educational Leadership, 17(1), 9–11.

41.

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2008). Program reports for the preparation of educational leaders. Washington, DC: National Council on Accreditation for Teacher Education.

42.

National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2002). Instructions to implement standards for advanced programs in educational leadership for principals, superintendents, curriculum directors and supervisors. Arlington, VA: Author.

43.

Olsen

(1999May 3). Demand for principals growing, but candidates aren't applying. Education Week, 18(25), 1, 20–22.

44.

Orr

(2008, March). How preparation influences school leaders and their school improvement: Comparing exemplary and conventionally prepared principals. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

45.

Poole

J. J.

(1999). Perceptions of preparedness of critical skills based on type of principal preparation program; traditional or non-traditional. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60 (4271), 12A. (UMI No. 9955240).

46.

Pounder

Crow

(2005). Sustaining the pipeline of school administrators. Educational Leadership, 62(8), 56–60.

47.

Pounder

Galvin

Sheppard

(2003). An analysis of the United States educational administration shortage. Australian Journal of Education, 47(2), 133–145.

48.

Pounder

Merrill

(2001). Job desirability of the high school principalship: A job choice theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 25–57.

49.

Pounder

Reitzug

Young

(2002). Preparing school leaders for school improvement, social justice, and community. In Murphy

(Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 261–288). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

50.

Quenneville

J. M.

(2007). Preparing school leaders: School administrators’ perceptions of traditional and district level training programs. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68 (105), 04A. (UMI No. 3260662).

51.

Robinson

Lloyd

Rowe

(2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the different effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.

52.

Roza

Celio

Harvey

Wishon

(2003). A matter of definition: Is there truly a shortage of school principals? Washington, DC: Center on Reinventing Public Education, Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs.

53.

Sanders

N. M.

Simpson

(2005). State policy framework to develop highly qualified administrators. Washington, D.C: CCSSO.

54.

Spillane

(2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

55.

Sykes

(2002). Models of preparation for the professions: Implications for educational leadership. In Tucker

M. S.

Codding

J. B.

(Eds.), The principal challenge: Leading and managing schools in an era of accountability (pp. 143–200). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

56.

Sykes

Elmore

(1988). Making schools manageable: Policy and administration for tomorrow's schools. In Hannaway

Crowson

(Eds.), The politics of reforming school administration: The 1988 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 77–94). New York: Falmer Press.

57.

Terozzi

(2004). Repainting the canvas: The changing artistry of the principalship. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

58.

Tucker

M. S.

Codding

J. B.

(Eds.). (2002). The principal challenge: Leading and managing schools in an era of accountability San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

59.

Young

M. D.

Crow

Orr

M. T.

Ogawa

Creighton

(2005). An educative look at “Educating School Leaders.” UCEA Review, 42(2), 1–4.