Hockey is an immensely popular sport in Canada, especially among youth participants. Despite evidence on the rates and risk of head injuries, especially in bodychecking contexts, little research has explored how and why injury occurs in gameplay through video observational methods.
Objective:
To understand whether head contact (HC) events occur in youth bodychecking hockey as a result of play execution according to the rules, or result from violent and/or aggressive play.
Study Design:
Descriptive observational video analysis.
Methods:
Verified head impact data from bodychecking minor hockey in Eastern Ontario at AA/AAA levels were used. In total, 249 verified head impacts were available for analysis across 48 under-15 (U15) and under-18 (U18) games. A comprehensive video analysis of head impacts was conducted to identify whether play was: (1) penalty vs no penalty; and (2) aggressive vs nonaggressive. Penalties were evaluated based on rule definition through video analysis, rather than the referee’s call on the ice. Similarly, 4 contextual definitions for aggressive/nonaggressive gameplay behaviors were established for analysis.
Results:
Amongst the highest levels in U15 and U18 bodychecking hockey, our results demonstrate that most HC events (~68%) were the outcome of nonaggressive play and within the rules of the sport (~67%).
Conclusion:
Key findings from this study identify that HC events are mainly a result of legal and nonaggressive hockey gameplay. While the rules do penalize aggressive play, these same rules do not prevent HC from occurring in bodychecking hockey.
Relevance:
This study adds to existing knowledge by identifying contextual factors related to potential injury events (HC) through video analysis in youth bodychecking hockey. This explains why injuries may happen, and assists in shifting research efforts towards injury prevention rather than simply documenting rates.
AdamsSMasonCWRobidouxMA.‘If you don’t want to get hurt, don’t play hockey’: the uneasy efforts of hockey injury prevention in Canada. Sociol Sport J. 2015;32(3):248-265. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2014-0092
2.
AllainKA.“Real fast and tough”: the construction of Canadian hockey masculinity. Sociol Sport J. 2008;25(4):462-481. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.25.4.462
3.
BanduraA.Psychological mechanisms of aggression. In: VonCranachMFoppaKLePeniesWPloogD, eds. Human Ethology: Claims and Limits of a New Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979.
4.
BaronR.Human Aggression. New York, NY: Springer; 1977.
5.
BlackAMMacphersonAKHagelBE, et al. Policy change eliminating body checking in non-elite ice hockey leads to a threefold reduction in injury and concussion risk in 11-and 12-year-old players. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(1):55-61. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095103
6.
BlackAMMeeuwisseDWEliasonPHHagelBEEmeryCA.Sport participation and injury rates in high school students: a Canadian survey of 2029 adolescents. J Safety Res. 2021;78:314-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.06.008
7.
ChenWPostAKartonCGilchristMDRobidouxMAHoshizakiTB.A comparison of frequency and magnitude of head impacts between Pee Wee and Bantam youth ice hockey. Sports Biomech. 2020;22(6):728-751. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1754450
8.
CoakleyJJ.Sport in Society: Issues and Controversies. 6th ed.New York, NY: Irwin/McGraw-Hill; 1998.
9.
CusimanoMDTabackNAMcFaullSRHodginsRBekeleTMElfekiN.Effect of bodychecking on rate of injuries among minor hockey players. Open Med. 2011;5(1):e57-e64.
10.
CusimanoMDNastisSZuccaroL.Effectiveness of interventions to reduce aggression and injuries among ice hockey players: a systematic review. Can Med Assoc J. 2013;185(1):e57-e69. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.112017
11.
CusimanoMDIlieGMullenSJ, et al. Aggression, violence and injury in minor league ice hockey: avenues for prevention of injury. PLOS One. 2016;11(6):e0156683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156683
12.
DarlingSRSchaubelDEBakerJGLeddyJJBissonLJWillerB.Intentional versus unintentional contacts as a mechanism of injury in youth ice hockey. Br J Sports Med. 2010;45(6):492-497. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.063693
13.
DonskovASHumphreysDDickeyJP.What is injury in ice hockey: an integrative literature review on injury rates, injury definition, and athlete exposure in men’s elite ice hockey. Sports. 2019;7(11):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7110227
14.
EmeryCAMeeuwisseWH.Injury rates, risk factors, and mechanisms of injury in minor hockey. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):1960-1969. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506290061
EmeryCAHagelBDecloeMCarlyM.Risk factors for injury and severe injury in youth ice hockey: A systematic review of the literature. Inj Prev. 2010;16(2):113-118. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2009.022764
17.
EmeryCAPalacios-DerflingherLBlackAM, et al. Does disallowing body checking in non-elite 13- to 14-year-old ice hockey leagues reduce rates of injury and concussion? A cohort study in two Canadian provinces. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(7):414-420. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101092
18.
FridmanLFraser-ThomasJLMcFaullSRMacphersonAK.Epidemiology of sports-related injuries in children and youth presenting to Canadian emergency departments from 2007-2010. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2013;5(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-5-30
19.
GeeCSullivanP.Using a direct observation approach to study aggressive behaviour in hockey: some preliminary findings. Athletic Insight. 2006;8(1):16-31.
20.
GouletCRoyT-ONadeauLHamelDFortierKEmeryCA.The incidence and types of physical contact associated with body checking regulation experience in 13-14 year old ice hockey players. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(7):668. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13070668
21.
HagelBEMarkoJDrydenDCouperthwaiteABSommerfeldtJRoweBH.Effect of bodychecking on injury rates among minor ice hockey players. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;175:155-160. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051531
KirkerBTennenbaumGMattsonJ.An investigation of the dynamics of aggression: direct observation in ice hockey and basketball. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(4):373-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2000.10608920
28.
KukaswadiaAWarshJMihalikJPPickettW.Effects of changing body-checking rules on rates of injury in minor hockey. Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):735-741. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2083
29.
LougheadTMLeithLM.Hockey coaches’ and players’ perceptions of aggression and aggressive behavior of players. J Sport Behav. 2001;24(4):394-407.
30.
MarchieACusimanoMD.Bodychecking and concussions in ice hockey: Should our youth pay the price?Can Med Assoc J. 2003;169(2):124-128. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/169/2/124.long
31.
MihalikJPGreenlandRMBlackburnJTCantuRCMarshallSWGuskiewiczKM.Effect of infraction type on head impact severity in youth ice hockey. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(8):1431-1438. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d2521a
32.
PostAHoshizakiTBKartonC, et al. The biomechanics of concussion for ice hockey head impact events. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2019;22(6):631-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2019.1577827
33.
RobidouxMAKendallMLaflammeYPostAKartonCHoshizakiTB.Comparing concussion rates as reported by Hockey Canada with head contact events as observed across minor ice-hockey age categories. J Concuss. 2020;4:2059700220911285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059700220911285
34.
RussellGW.The Social Psychology of Sport. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1993.
35.
RussellGW.Aggression in the Sports World: a Social Psychological Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008.
ShieldsDBredemeierB.Character Development and Physical Activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1995.
38.
SilvaJM. Assertive and aggressive behavior in sport: a definitional clarification. In: NadeauCHHalliwellWRNewellKMRobertsGC, eds. Psychology of Motor Behavior and Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1979:199-208.
SmithAMStuartMJRobertsWO, et al. Concussion in ice hockey: current gaps and future directions in an objective diagnosis. Clin J Sport Med. 2017;27(5):503-509. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000412
41.
SmithMD.The legitimation of violence: hockey players’ perceptions of their reference groups’ sanctions for assault. Can Rev Soc Anthropol. 1975;12(1):72-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.1975.tb00028.x
42.
SmithMD.Violence and Sport. Oxford, UK: Butterworths; 1983.
43.
StephensD. Aggression. In: DudaJL, ed. Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology; 1998: 277-292.
44.
TatorCHProvvidenzaCFLapczakLCarsonJRaymondD.Spinal injuries in Canadian ice hockey: documentation of injuries sustained from 1943-1999. Can J Neurol Sci. 2004;31(4):460-466. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100003632
VazEW.Institutionalized rule violation and control in organized minor league hockey. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1979;4:83-90.
47.
VisekAWatsonJ.Ice hockey players’ legitimacy of aggression and professionalization of attitudes. Sport Psychol. 2005;19(2):178-192. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.19.2.178
WidmeyerWNBirchJS.Aggression in professional ice hockey: a strategy for success or a reaction to failure?J Psychol. 1984;117(1st Half):77-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1984.9923661
50.
WillerBKroetschBDarlingSHutsonALeddyJ.Injury rates in house league, select, and representative youth ice hockey. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(10):1658-1663. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000181839.86170.06
51.
WilliamsonIJSGoodmanD.Concussion in youth hockey: prevalence, risk factors, and management across observation strategies. J ASTM Int. 2009;6(3):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI101851
52.
WilliamsonRAKolstadATKrolikowskiM, et al. Incidence of head contacts, penalties, and player contact behaviors in youth ice hockey: evaluating the “zero tolerance for head contact” policy change. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(3):2325967121992375. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967121992375
53.
ZemekRLGroolAMRodriguez DuqueD, et al. Annual and seasonal trends in ambulatory visits for pediatric concussion in Ontario between 2003 and 2013. J Pediatr. 2017;181:222-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.10.067
