Abstract
Background:
This study aimed to develop an objective, repetition-based method for inter-set rest adjustment in resistance training (RT), addressing limitations of fixed and self-selected intervals.
Hypothesis:
The adjustable protocol would yield greater repetition volume, higher velocity, and lower fatigue than the fixed protocol, with reduced time cost compared with the self-selected protocol.
Study Design:
Crossover randomized trial.
Level of Evidence:
Level 2.
Methods:
A total of 20 young adults completed 3 RT protocols in randomized order: fixed, self-selected, and adjustable. Each protocol involved 5 sets of bench press and bench pull at approximately 75% 1 repetition maximal, performed close to failure. The protocols differed in inter-set rest strategy: fixed (3-minute rest), self-selected (participant-determined), and adjustable (based on previous set repetition count).
Results:
Our findings indicated that the self-selected and adjustable protocols resulted in significantly greater repetition volume compared with the fixed protocol (F = 7.0; P = 0.003). Although the self-selected and adjustable protocols exhibited significantly higher fastest set velocity than the fixed protocol (F = 3.5, P = 0.04), the practical difference was only 0.01 m/s. In addition, no significant main effects of protocol were observed in mean set velocity, blood lactate concentration, or perceived exertion (F = 1.1-2.4; P = 0.10-0.58). In terms of time efficiency, the fixed protocol was the most efficient, followed by the adjustable protocol, with the self-selected protocol being the least efficient.
Conclusion:
People using the adjustable protocol achieved greater repetition volume without increased metabolic stress or perceived exertion compared with the fixed 3-minute rest. Although the adjustable protocol sacrifices some time efficiency compared with the fixed protocol, it remains more efficient than the self-selected approach.
Clinical Relevance:
The repetition-based inter-set rest adjustment approach can serve as a feasible alternative to both fixed and self-selected inter-set rest approaches in RT.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
