Isometric and dynamic tasks of low-to-moderate intensities have been used to study sex differences in fatigability; however, maximal exertions with flywheel devices (FDs) have not been used. This study aimed to (1) detect sex differences in fatigue-related performance in a maximal intermittent fatiguing protocol on a FD, and (2) investigate the most sensitive dynamometric and mechanical variables for assessing fatigue in both sexes.
Hypothesis:
No sex differences should exist when performing this protocol on a FD.
Study Design:
Cohort observational study.
Level of Evidence:
Level 3.
Methods:
A total of 34 young adults (17 female/17 male) performed 10 sets of 10 repetitions with 3 minutes of passive recovery of a half-squat exercise on a FD. Inter- and intraset analysis of force, power, velocity, work, and impulse, together with their relative change and slope, were calculated during concentric and eccentric phases. Raw data were also normalized to body mass in the interset analysis. The relative changes in each variable were compared.
Results:
Men showed greater and earlier decreases in performance throughout sets (P < .05; ηp2 ≥ 0.08), but these differences were not consistent after normalization for body mass (P > .05; ηp2 ≤ 0.05). Irrespective of sex and phase, the intraset analysis revealed that relative change was higher in the last set (P ≤ .03; ηp2 ≥ 0.14), with power being the most sensitive variable for detecting performance decline (P ≤ .04; ηp2 = 0.49).
Conclusion:
Women experienced slower and delayed fatigue kinetics than men during a maximal intermittent fatiguing protocol with FD if body dimensionality is not considered. For training purposes, power seems to be the most sensitive and discriminative variable for detecting decreases in performance.
Clinical Relevance:
Body dimensionality is a key factor that must be considered when comparing both sexes in FDs.
AnsdellPŠkarabotJAtkinsonE, et al. Sex differences in fatigability following exercise normalised to the power-duration relationship. J Physiol. 2020;598(24):5717-5737.
2.
AnsdellPThomasKHicksKMHunterSKHowatsonGGoodallS.Physiological sex differences affect the integrative response to exercise: acute and chronic implications. Exp Physiol. 2020;105(12):2007-2021.
3.
AnsdellPThomasKHowatsonGHunterSGoodallS.Contraction intensity and sex differences in knee-extensor fatigability. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017;37:68-74.
4.
AsklingCKarlssonJThorstenssonA.Hamstring injury occurrence in elite soccer players after preseason strength training with eccentric overload. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(4):244-250.
5.
AzevedoRdAForotJIannettaDMacInnisMJMilletGYMuriasJM. Slight power output manipulations around the maximal lactate steady state have a similar impact on fatigue in females and males. J Appl Physiol. 2021;130(6):1879-1892.
6.
BillautFBishopDJ.Mechanical work accounts for sex differences in fatigue during repeated sprints. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(4):1429-1436.
7.
BruseghiniPCalabriaETamE, et al. Effects of eight weeks of aerobic interval training and of isoinertial resistance training on risk factors of cardiometabolic diseases and exercise capacity in healthy elderly subjects. Oncotarget. 2015;6(19):16998-17015.
8.
CarrollKMWagleJPSatoK, et al. Characterising overload in inertial flywheel devices for use in exercise training. Sports Biomech. 2019;18(4):390-401.
9.
CoratellaGChemelloASchenaF.Muscle damage and repeated bout effect induced by enhanced eccentric squats. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016;56(12):1540-1546.
10.
CroninJBHendersonME.Maximal strength and power assessment in novice weight trainers. 2004;18(1):48-52.
11.
EnokaRMStuartDG.Neurobiology of muscle fatigue. J Appl Physiol. 1992;72(5):1631-1648.
12.
EvansJW.Periodized resistance training for enhancing skeletal muscle hypertrophy and strength: a mini-review. Front Physiol. 2019;10:436344.
13.
FahsCABlumkaitisJCRossowLM.Factors related to average concentric velocity of four barbell exercises at various loads. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(3):597-605.
14.
FaulFErdfelderEBuchnerALangAG.Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-1160.
15.
Fernandez-GonzaloRNissemarkCAslundBTeschPASojkaP.Chronic stroke patients show early and robust improvements in muscle and functional performance in response to eccentric-overload flywheel resistance training: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:150.
16.
GandeviaSC.Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(4):1725-1789.
17.
GlaisterMHowatsonGPattisonJRMcInnesG.The reliability and validity of fatigue measures during multiple-sprint work: an issue revisited. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(5):1597-1601.
18.
HennemanESomjenGCarpenterDO.Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1965;28(3):560-580.
19.
HicksALKent-BraunJDitorDS.Sex differences in human skeletal muscle fatigue. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001;29(3):109-112.
20.
HubalMJRubinsteinSRClarksonPM.Muscle function in men and women during maximal eccentric exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(4):1332-1338.
21.
HunterSK.Performance fatigability: mechanisms and task specificity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8(7):a029728.
22.
HunterSK.The relevance of sex differences in performance fatigability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(11):2247-2256.
23.
HunterSK.Sex differences and mechanisms of task-specific muscle fatigue. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009;37(3):113-122.
24.
HunterSK.Sex differences in fatigability of dynamic contractions. Exp Physiol. 2016;101(2):250-255.
25.
HunterSKButlerJEToddGGandeviaSCTaylorJL.Supraspinal fatigue does not explain the sex difference in muscle fatigue of maximal contractions. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;101(4):1036-1044.
26.
HunterSKGriffithEESchlachterKMKufahlTD.Sex differences in time to task failure and blood flow for an intermittent isometric fatiguing contraction. Muscle Nerve. 2009;39(1):42-53.
27.
Iglesias-SolerEMayoXRial-VázquezJHaffGG.Inter-individual variability in the load-velocity relationship is detected by multilevel mixed regression models. Sports Biomech. 2018;20(3):304-318.
28.
Illera-DominguezVNuellSCarmonaG, et al. Early functional and morphological muscle adaptations during short-term inertial-squat training. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1265.
29.
KellawanJMJohanssonREHarrellJW, et al. Exercise vasodilation is greater in women: contributions of nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115(8):1735-1746.
30.
KomiPVBoscoC.Utilization of stored elastic energy in leg extensor muscles by men and women. Med Sci Sports. 1978;10(4):261-265.
31.
LaurentCMGreenJMBishopPA, et al. Effect of gender on fatigue and recovery following maximal intensity repeated sprint performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2010;50(3):243-253.
32.
LeeABaxterJEischerCGageMHunterSYoonT.Sex differences in neuromuscular function after repeated eccentric contractions of the knee extensor muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017;117(6):1119-1130.
33.
Martín-RiveraFBeatoMAlepuz-MonerVMaroto-IzquierdoS.Use of concentric linear velocity to monitor flywheel exercise load. Front Physiol. 2022;13:961572.
34.
MartinPGRatteyJ.Central fatigue explains sex differences in muscle fatigue and contralateral cross-over effects of maximal contractions. Pflugers Arch. 2007;454(6):957-969.
35.
Martinez-ArandaLMFernandez-GonzaloR.Effects of inertial setting on power, force, work, and eccentric overload during flywheel resistance exercise in women and men. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(6):1653-1661.
36.
Martínez-CavaAMorán-NavarroRHernández-BelmonteA, et al. Range of motion and sticking region effects on the bench press load-velocity relationship. J Sports Sci Med. 2019;18(4):645-652.
37.
McErlain-NaylorSABeatoM.Concentric and eccentric inertia-velocity and inertia-power relationships in the flywheel squat. J Sports Sci. 2021;39(10):1136-1143.
38.
MorasGFernandez-ValdesBVazquez-GuerreroJTous-FajardoJExelJSampaioJ.Entropy measures detect increased movement variability in resistance training when elite rugby players use the ball. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(12):1286-1292.
39.
MorawetzDBlankCKollerAArvandiMSiebertUSchobersbergerW.Sex-related differences after a single bout of maximal eccentric exercise in response to acute effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(9):2697-2707.
40.
Muñoz-LópezAFonsecaFSRamírez-CampilloRGantoisPNuñezFJNakamuraFY.The use of real-time monitoring during flywheel resistance training programmes: how can we measure eccentric overload? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Sport. 2021;38(4):639-652.
41.
Muñoz-LópezANakamuraFYBeatoM.Eccentric overload differences between loads and training variables on flywheel training. Biol Sport. 2023;40(4):1151-1158.
42.
Nieto-AcevedoRRomero-MoraledaBDíaz-LaraFJRubiaAGonzález-GarcíaJMon-LópezD.A systematic review and meta-analysis of the differences in mean propulsive velocity between men and women in different exercises. Sports (Basel). 2023;11(6):118.
43.
NorrbrandLFluckeyJDPozzoMTeschPA.Resistance training using eccentric overload induces early adaptations in skeletal muscle size. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102(3):271-281.
44.
NorrbrandLPozzoMTeschPA.Flywheel resistance training calls for greater eccentric muscle activation than weight training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;110(5):997-1005.
45.
NuñezFJGalianoCMuñoz-LópezAFloriaP.Is possible an eccentric overload in a rotary inertia device? Comparison of force profile in a cylinder-shaped and a cone-shaped axis devices. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(14):1624-1628.
46.
NuzzoJL.Narrative review of sex differences in muscle strength, endurance, activation, size, fiber type, and strength training participation rates, preferences, motivations, injuries, and neuromuscular adaptations. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37(2):494-536.
47.
PetréHWernstålFMattssonCM.Effects of flywheel training on strength-related variables: a meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2018;4(1):55.
48.
PinciveroDMGandaioCMItoY.Gender-specific knee extensor torque, flexor torque, and muscle fatigue responses during maximal effort contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;89(2):134-141.
49.
PonsMSHunterSKAnsdellP.Sex differences in fatigability and recovery following a 5 km running time trial in recreationally active adults. Eur J Sport Sci. 2023:23(12):2349-2356.
50.
PowerGADaltonBHRiceCLVandervoortAA.Peak power is reduced following lengthening contractions despite a maintenance of shortening velocity. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013;38(12):1196-1205.
51.
PuustinenJVenojarviMHaverinenMLundbergTR. Effects of flywheel vs. traditional resistance training on neuromuscular performance of elite ice hockey players. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37(1):136-140.
52.
Raya-GonzalezJde KeijzerKLBishopCBeatoM.Effects of flywheel training on strength-related variables in female populations. A systematic review. Res Sports Med. 2022;30(4):353-370.
53.
RezendeFACRibeiroAQPrioreSEFranceschinniSDCC. Anthropometric differences related to genders and age in the elderly. Nutr Hosp. 2015;32(2):757-764.
54.
Romero-RodriguezDGualGTeschPA.Efficacy of an inertial resistance training paradigm in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy in athletes: a case-series study. Phys Ther Sport. 2011;12(1):43-48.
55.
RussDWKent-BraunJA.Sex differences in human skeletal muscle fatigue are eliminated under ischemic conditions. J Appl Physiol. 2003;94(6):2414-2422.
56.
SabidoRHernández-DavóJLCapdeponLTous-FajardoJ.How are mechanical, physiological, and perceptual variables affected by the rest interval between sets during a flywheel resistance session?Front Physiol. 2020;11:663.
57.
SabidoRHernández-DavóJLPereyra-GerberGT.Influence of different inertial loads on basic training variables during the flywheel squat exercise. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(4):482-489.
58.
SagelvEHPedersenSNilsenLPR, et al. Flywheel squats versus free weight high load squats for improving high velocity movements in football. A randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2020;12:61.
59.
SenefeldJYoonTBementMHHunterSK.Fatigue and recovery from dynamic contractions in men and women differ for arm and leg muscles. Muscle Nerve. 2013;48(3):436-439.
60.
SewrightKAHubalMJKearnsAHolbrookMTClarksonPM.Sex differences in response to maximal eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(2):242-251.
61.
SheppardJMGabbettTTaylorK-LDormanJLebedewAJBorgeaudR.Development of a repeated-effort test for elite men’s volleyball. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007;2(3):292-304.
62.
SherwoodDESchmidtRA.The relationship between force and force variability in minimal and near-maximal static and dynamic contractions. J Mot Behav. 1980;12(1):75-89.
63.
ŠkarabotJBrownsteinCGCasoloADel VecchioAAnsdellP.The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121(3):675-685.
64.
SuchomelTJWagleJPDouglasJ, et al. Implementing eccentric resistance training—part 1: a brief review of existing methods. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2019;4(2):38.
65.
Tous-FajardoJGonzalo-SkokOArjol-SerranoJLTeschP.Enhancing change-of-direction speed in soccer players by functional inertial eccentric overload and vibration training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(1):66-73.
66.
Tous-FajardoJMaldonadoRAQuintanaJMPozzoMTeschP.The flywheel leg-curl machine: offering eccentric overload for hamstring development. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006;1(3):293-298.
67.
Vicens-BordasJEsteveEFort-VanmeerhaegheABandholmTThorborgK.Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength? A systematic review with meta-analyses.J Sports Sci Med. 2018;21(1):75-83.
68.
WeirJBeckTCramerJHoushT.Is fatigue all in your head? A critical review of the central governor model. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(7):573-586.
69.
WorcesterKSBakerPABollingerLM.Effects of inertial load on sagittal plane kinematics of the lower extremity during flywheel-based squats. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(1):63-69.
70.
YoonTDoyelRWiduleCHunterSK.Sex differences with aging in the fatigability of dynamic contractions. Exp Gerontol. 2015;70:1-10.
71.
YoonTSchlinder DelapBGriffithEEHunterSK.Mechanisms of fatigue differ after low- and high-force fatiguing contractions in men and women. Muscle Nerve. 2007;36(4):515-524.
