Does lower baseline cognitive function predispose athletes to ACL injury risk, especially when performing unplanned or dual-task movements?
Objective:
To evaluate the association between cognitive function and biomechanics related to ACL injuries during cognitively challenging sports movements.
Data Sources:
PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO databases were searched; additional hand searching was also conducted.
Study Selection:
The following inclusion criteria had to be met: participants completed (1) a neurocognitive test, (2) a cognitively challenging sport-related task involving lower limbs, and (3) a biomechanical analysis. The following criteria determined exclusion from the review: studies involving participants with (1) recent or current musculoskeletal injuries; (2) recent or current concussion; (3) ACL surgical reconstruction, reviews of the literature, commentary or opinion articles, and case studies.
Study Design:
Systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).
Level of Evidence:
Level 3.
Data Extraction:
Two of authors independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the articles with the Downs and Black and ROBINS-I checklists, to assess methodological quality and risk of bias, respectively.
Results:
Six studies with different methodologies and confounding factors were included in this review. Of these 6 studies, 3 were ranked as high-quality, 3 demonstrated a low risk of bias, 2 a moderate risk, and 1 a severe risk. Five studies found a cognitive-motor relationship, with worse cognitive performance associated with increased injury risk, with 1 study reporting the opposite directionality for 1 variable. One study did not identify any interaction between cognitive function and biomechanical outcomes.
Conclusion:
Worse cognitive performance is associated with an increased injury risk profile during cognitively challenging movements.
AbernethyBZawiK. Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. J Mot Behav. 2007;39(5):353-367.
2.
AlvarezJAEmoryE. Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2006;16(1):17-42.
3.
AngueraJABernardJAJaeggiSM, et al. The effects of working memory resource depletion and training on sensorimotor adaptation. Behav Brain Res. 2012;228(1):107-115.
4.
van AssenMALMvan AertRCMNuijtenMBWichertsJM. Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results. PLoS One. 2014;9:e84896.
5.
AvedesianJMForbesWCovassinTDufekJS. Influence of cognitive performance on musculoskeletal injury risk: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(2):554-562.
6.
BahrR. Why screening tests to predict injury do not work-and probably never will…: a critical review. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):776-780.
7.
BeaulieuMLAshton-MillerJAWojtysEM. Loading mechanisms of the anterior cruciate ligament. Sport Biomech. 2023;22(1):1-29.
8.
BenjaminseAWebsterKEKimpAMeijerMGokelerA. revised approach to the role of fatigue in anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Sport Med. 2019;49(4):565-586.
9.
BittencourtNFNMeeuwisseWHMendonçaLDNettel-AguirreAOcarinoJMFonsecaST. Complex systems approach for sports injuries: moving from risk factor identification to injury pattern recognition - narrative review and new concept. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(21):1309-1314.
10.
BodenBPDeanCSFeaginJAGarrettWE. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics. 2000;23(6):573-578.
11.
BodenBPSheehanFTTorgJSHewettTE. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: mechanisms and risk factors. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(9):520-527.
12.
BonnetteSDiekfussJAGroomsDR, et al. Electrocortical dynamics differentiate athletes exhibiting low- and high-ACL injury risk biomechanics. Psychophysiology. 2020;57(4):e13530.
13.
BorotikarBSNewcomerRKoppesRMcLeanSG. Combined effects of fatigue and decision making on female lower limb landing postures: central and peripheral contributions to ACL injury risk. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23(1):81-92.
14.
BurcalCJNeedleARCusterLRosenAB. The effects of cognitive loading on motor behavior in injured individuals: a systematic review. Sport Med. 2019;49(8):1233-1253.
15.
CarlsonVRSheehanFTBodenBP. Video analysis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. JBJS Rev. 2016;4(11):e5.
16.
CohenJCohenPWestSGAikenLS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge; 2003.
17.
ConwayARAKaneMJEngleRW. Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7(12):547-552.
18.
DeangelisAINeedleARKaminskiTWRoyerTRKnightCASwanikCB. An acoustic startle alters knee joint stiffness and neuromuscular control. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2015;25(4):509-516.
19.
Della VillaFBuckthorpeMGrassiA, et al. Systematic video analysis of ACL injuries in professional male football (soccer): injury mechanisms, situational patterns and biomechanics study on 134 consecutive cases. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(23):1423-1432.
20.
DownsSHBlackN. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):377-384.
21.
FanelliD. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics. 2012;90:891-904.
22.
FarrowDAbernethyB. Do expertise and the degree of perception-action coupling affect natural anticipatory performance?Perception. 2003;32(9):1127-1139.
23.
FinoPCParringtonLPittW, et al. Detecting gait abnormalities after concussion or mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of single-task, dual-task, and complex gait. Gait Posture. 2018;62:157-166.
24.
FischerPDHutchisonKABeckerJNMonfortSM. Evaluating the spectrum of cognitive-motor relationships during dual-task jump landing. J Appl Biomech. 2021;37(4):388-395.
25.
FritzNECheekFMNichols-LarsenDS. Motor-cognitive dual-task training in persons with neurologic disorders: a systematic review. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015;39:142-153.
26.
GiescheFEngeroffTWilkeJNiedererDVogtLBanzerW. Neurophysiological correlates of motor planning and movement initiation in ACL-reconstructed individuals: a case-control study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e023048.
27.
GiescheFWilkeJEngeroffT, et al. Are biomechanical stability deficits during unplanned single-leg landings related to specific markers of cognitive function?J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23(1):82-88.
HarveyPD. Domains of cognition and their assessment. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2019;21(3):227-237.
30.
HermanDCBarthJT. Drop-jump landing varies with baseline neurocognition: implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury risk and prevention. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(9):2347-2353.
31.
HermanDCZaremskiJLVincentHKVincentKR. Effect of neurocognition and concussion on musculoskeletal injury risk. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2015;14(3):194-199.
32.
HewettTETorgJSBodenBP. Video analysis of trunk and knee motion during non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes: lateral trunk and knee abduction motion are combined components of the injury mechanism. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(6):417-422.
33.
HosseinzadehSKiapourAM. Age-related changes in ACL morphology during skeletal growth and maturation are different between females and males. J Orthop Res. 2021;39(4):841-849.
34.
HowellDRBonnetteSDiekfussJA, et al. Dual-task gait stability after concussion and subsequent injury: an exploratory investigation. Sensors (Switzerland). 2020;20(21):6297.
35.
HughesGDaiB. The influence of decision making and divided attention on lower limb biomechanics associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury: a narrative review. Sport Biomech. 2023;22(1):30-45.
36.
HulmeAFinchCF. From monocausality to systems thinking: a complementary and alternative conceptual approach for better understanding the development and prevention of sports injury. Inj Epidemiol. 2015;2(1):31.
37.
JohnstonJTMandelbaumBRSchubD, et al. Video Analysis of anterior cruciate ligament tears in professional American football athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(4):862-868.
38.
KippKBrownTNMcLeanSGPalmieri-SmithRM. Decision making and experience level influence frontal plane knee joint biomechanics during a cutting maneuver. J Appl Biomech. 2013;29(6):756-762.
39.
KlineRB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed.New York: Guilford Press; 2015.
40.
KnudsonD. Confidence crisis of results in biomechanics research. Sport Biomech. 2017;16(4):425-433.
41.
KrosshaugTNakamaeABodenBP, et al. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury in basketball: video analysis of 39 cases. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):359-367.
42.
LeeMJCLloydDGLayBSBourkePDAldersonJA. Effects of different visual stimuli on postures and knee moments during sidestepping. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(9):1740-1748.
43.
LucarnoSZagoMBuckthorpeM, et al. Systematic video analysis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in professional female soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(7):1794-1802.
44.
MartinJMashburnCAEngleRW. Improving the validity of the armed service vocational aptitude battery with measures of attention control. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2020;9:323-335.
45.
MejaneJFaubertJRomeasTLabbeDR. The combined impact of a perceptual-cognitive task and neuromuscular fatigue on knee biomechanics during landing. Knee. 2019;26(1):52-60.
46.
MonfortSMPradarelliJJGroomsDRHutchisonKAOnateJAChaudhariAMW. Visual-spatial memory deficits are related to increased knee valgus angle during a sport-specific sidestep cut. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(6):1488-1495.
47.
MontgomeryCBlackburnJWithersDTierneyGMoranCSimmsC. Mechanisms of ACL injury in professional rugby union: a systematic video analysis of 36 cases. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:994-1001.
48.
NasseriALloydDGMinahanC, et al. Effects of pubertal maturation on ACL forces during a landing task in females. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(12):3322-3334.
49.
NessBMZimneyKSchweinleWEClelandJA. Dual-Task Assessment implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020;15(6):840-855.
50.
NiedererDWillbergCKruseA, et al. Acute effects of preventive warm-up exercises on modifiable risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a 3-arm randomized-controlled crossover trial. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020;60(1):92-101.
51.
NorteGEFrendtTRMurrayAMArmstrongCWMcLoughlinTJDonovanLT. Influence of anticipation and motor-motor task performance on cutting biomechanics in healthy men. J Athl Train. 2020;55(8):834-842.
52.
PashlerH. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull. 1994;116(2):220-244.
53.
PiskinDBenjaminseADimitrakisPGokelerA. Neurocognitive and neurophysiological functions related to ACL injury: a framework for neurocognitive approaches in rehabilitation and return-to-sports tests. Sport Health. 2022;14(4):549-555.
54.
PorterKQuintanaCHochM. The relationship between neurocognitive function and biomechanics: a critically appraised topic. J Sport Rehabil. 2020;30(2):327-332.
55.
RosenthalRDiMatteoMR. Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:59-82.
56.
Sánchez-CubilloIPeriáñezJAAdrover-RoigD, et al. Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009;15(3):438-450.
57.
SchönbrodtFDPeruginiM. At what sample size do correlations stabilize?J Res Pers. 2013;47(5):609-612.
58.
SeidlerRDBoJAngueraJA. Neurocognitive contributions to motor skill learning: the role of working memory. J Mot Behav. 2012;44(6):445-453.
59.
ShamseerLMoherDClarkeM, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349(1):7647-7647.
60.
ShibataSTakemuraMMiyakawaS. The influence of differences in neurocognitive function on lower limb kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity during an unanticipated cutting motion. Phys Ther Res. 2018;21(2):44-52.
61.
SterneJAHernánMAReevesBC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
62.
SwanikCB. Brains and sprains: the brain’s role in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. J Athl Train. 2015;50(10):1100-1102.
63.
SwanikCBCovassinTStearneDJSchatzP. The relationship between neurocognitive function and noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(6):943-948.
64.
WaldénMKrosshaugTBjørneboeJAndersenTEFaulOHägglundM. Three distinct mechanisms predominate in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in male professional football players: a systematic video analysis of 39 cases. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(22):1452-1460.
65.
WilkeJGronebergDBanzerWGiescheF. Perceptual-cognitive function and unplanned athletic movement task performance: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7481.
66.
WilkersonGB. Neurocognitive reaction time predicts lower extremity sprains and strains. Int J Athl Ther Train. 2012;17(6):4-9.
67.
WooEBurnsYJohnstonL. The effect of task uncertainty on muscle activation patterns in 8-10-year-old children. Physiother Res Int. 2003;8(3):143-154.
68.
WrightRWBrandRADunnWSpindlerKP. How to write a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:23-29.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
