No research has investigated the training load (TL) monitoring practices currently used by strength and conditioning (S&C) coaches in Gaelic games. The purpose of this study was to investigate the TL monitoring practices used by S&C coaches across senior intercounty male and female Gaelic game sports.
Study Design:
Cross-sectional.
Hypotheses:
It was hypothesized that (1) TL is commonly monitored, (2) various methods are used by S&C coaches to monitor TL, and (3) the level of qualifications of the S&C coach is of a professional standard.
Level of Evidence:
Level 4.
Methods:
A total of 33 (n = 32 male and n = 1 female) S&C coaches participated in the study by completing an online questionnaire that investigated coach biography, coach education, team biography, monitoring practices, rating of perceived exertion, acute:chronic workload ratio, and data implementation.
Results:
The results showed that S&C coaches had varying levels of experience and education. All 33 coaches (100%) stated they monitored the TL of the players. The most common method used to monitor TL was session rating of perceived exertion, which was used by 91% of coaches. Analysis of an open-ended question afforded each participant the opportunity to share additional information, highlighting 3 themes: (1) communication with players, (2) performance testing, and (3) clarity and support among other coaching staff.
Conclusion:
Multiple methods are used to monitor TL in Gaelic games. Despite multiple forms of technology available, communication with players provides essential information regarding an athlete’s state.
Clinical Relevance:
As this is the first study to explore TL monitoring practices used by S&C coaches in Gaelic games, the results may inform the development of educational resources for the guidance of coaches working in Gaelic games in best practice TL monitoring.
AkenheadRNassisGP. Training load and player monitoring in high-level football: current practice and perceptions. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(5):587-593.
2.
ArchieJPJr. Mathematic coupling of data. A common source of error. Ann Surg. 1981;193(3):296-303.
3.
BallSHalakiMSharpTOrrR. Injury patterns, physiological profile, and performance in university rugby union. Int J Sports Physiol Perf. 2018;13(1):69-74.
4.
BeasleyKJ. Nutrition and Gaelic football: review, recommendations, and future considerations. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2015;25(1):1-13.
5.
BlanchPGabbettTJ. Has the athlete trained enough to return to play safely? The acute:chronic workload ratio permits clinicians to quantify a player’s risk of subsequent injury. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(8):471-475.
6.
BourdonPCCardinaleMMurrayA, et al. Monitoring athlete training loads: consensus statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2017;12(Suppl 2):S2161-S2170.
7.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101.
8.
ComynsTHannonA. Strength and conditioning coaches’ application of the session rating of perceived exertion method of monitoring within professional Rugby Union. J Human Kinet. 2018;61:155-166.
9.
ComynsTFlanaganEP. Applications of the session rating of perceived exertion system in professional Rugby union. Strength Cond J. 2013;35(6):78-85.
10.
CouttsAJDuffieldR. Validity and reliability of GPS devices for measuring movement demands of team sports. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(1):133-135.
11.
CoyneJOCNimphiusSNewtonRUHaffG. Does mathematical coupling matter to the acute to chronic workload ratio? A case study from elite sport. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(10):1447-1454.
12.
CrowleyEHarrisonAJLyonsM. Dry-land resistance training practices of elite swimming strength and conditioning coaches. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(9):2592-2600.
13.
CullenBDMcCarrenALMaloneS. Ecological validity of self-reported wellness measures to assess pre-training and pre-competition preparedness within elite Gaelic football. Sport Sci Health. 2020;17:163-172.
14.
DekkersTO’SullivanKBlakeCMcVeighJGCollinsK. Epidemiology and moderators of injury in Gaelic football: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2022;25(3):222-229.
15.
GabbettTJDomrowN. Relationships between training load, injury, and fitness in sub-elite collision sport athletes. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(13):1507-1519.
16.
GabbettTJHulinBBlanchPChapmanPBaileyD. To couple or not to couple? For acute:chronic workload ratios and injury risk, does it really matter?Int J Sports Med. 2019;40(9):597-600.
17.
GabbettTJNassisGPOetterE, et al. The athlete monitoring cycle: a practical guide to interpreting and applying training monitoring data. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(20):1451-1452.
18.
GriffinAKennyICComynsTMLyonsM. The association between the acute:chronic workload ratio and injury and its application in team sports: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2020;9(3):561-580.
19.
GriffinAKennyICComynsTMLyonsM. Training load monitoring in amateur rugby union: a survey of current practices. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(6):1568-1575.
20.
HaddadMStylianidesGDjaouiLDellalAChamariK. Session-RPE method for training load monitoring: validity, ecological usefulness, and influencing factors. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:612.
21.
HalsonSL. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med. 2014;44(Suppl 2):139-147.
22.
HealyRKennyICHarrisonAJ. Resistance training practices of sprint coaches. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(7):1939-1948.
23.
HermanLFosterCMaherMMikatRPorcariJ. Validity and reliability of the session RPE method for monitoring exercise training intensity. S Afr J Sports Med. 2006;18(1):14.
24.
HoutmeyersKCVanrenterghemJJaspersARufLBrinkMSHelsenWF. Load monitoring practice in European elite football and the impact of club culture and financial resources. Front Sports Act Living. 2021;3:679824.
25.
HulinBTGabbettTJBlanchPChapmanPBaileyDOrchardJW. Spikes in acute workload are associated with increased injury risk in elite cricket fast bowlers. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(8):708-712.
26.
LaneA. Never enough time. The experience of third level student county GAA players. GPA Sudent Report, Waterford Institute of Technology;2015.
27.
LolliLBatterhamAMHawkinsR, et al. Mathematical coupling causes spurious correlation within the conventional acute-to-chronic workload ratio calculations. Br J Sports Med. 2017; 53(15):921-922.
28.
MaloneSHughesBRoeMManganSCollinsK. Factors that influence session-rating of perceived exertion in elite Gaelic football. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(4):1176-1183.
29.
MaloneSOwenANewtonMMendesBCollinsKDGabbettTJ. The acute:chonic workload ratio in relation to injury risk in professional soccer. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(6):561-565.
30.
MaloneSRoeMDoranDAGabbettTJCollinsK. High chronic training loads and exposure to bouts of maximal velocity running reduce injury risk in elite Gaelic football. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(3):250-254.
31.
MaloneSRoeMDoranDAGabbettTJCollinsKD. Protection against spikes in workload with aerobic fitness and playing experience: the role of the acute:chronic workload ratio on injury risk in elite Gaelic football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(3):393-401.
32.
MaloneSSolanBCollinsKDDoranDA. Positional match running performance in elite Gaelic football. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(8):2292-2298.
33.
ManganSMaloneSRyanM, et al. The influence of match outcome on running performance in elite Gaelic football. Sci Med Football. 2017;1(3):272-279.
34.
McGahanJHManganSCollinsKBurnsCGabbettTNeillCO. Match-play running demands and technical performance among elite Gaelic footballers. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;35(1):169-175.
35.
McGahanJLaceySBurnsCGabbettTO’NeillC. Variation in training load and markers of wellness. J Aus Strength Cond. 2019;27:6-14.
36.
MullaneMBishopCTurnerA. Gaelic football: physical characteristics, training programmes, and a fitness test battery. 2019;52:7-19.
37.
MurrayNBGabbettTJTownshendADBlanchP. Calculating acute:chronic workload ratios using exponentially weighted moving averages provides a more sensitive indicator of injury likelihood than rolling averages. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(9):749-754.
38.
O’ConnorSLaceyP. Can we improve coaches’ injury prevention views and implementation practices in the community female Gaelic sport of camogie?BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020; 6(1):e000732
39.
O’GradyMYoungDCollinsKKeaneJMaloneSCoratellaG. An investigation of the sprint performance of senior elite camogie players during competitive play. Sport Sci Health. 2022;18:905-913.
40.
O’KeeffeSO’ConnorSNí ChéilleachairN. Are internal load measures associated with injuries in male adolescent Gaelic football players?Eur J Sport Sci. 2020;20(2):249-260.
41.
O’MalleyEMurphyJGissaneCBlakeC. Epidemiology of lower limb injury in Gaelic football and hurling. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:646-647.
42.
RoosLTaubeWBrandtMHeyerLWyssT. Monitoring of daily training load and training load responses in endurance sports: what do coaches want?Schweiz Z Sportmed Sporttraumatol. 2013;61(4):30-36.
43.
SawAEMainLCGastinPB. Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015;50(5):281-291.
44.
SchlingermannBELodgeCAGissaneCRankinPM. Effects of the Gaelic Athletic Association 15 on lower extremity injury incidence and neuromuscular functional outcomes in collegiate gaelic games. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(7):1993-2001.
45.
ScottTJBlackCRQuinnJCouttsAJ. Validity and reliability of the session-RPE method for quantifying training in Australian football: a comparison of the CR10 and CR100 scales. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(1):270-276.
46.
SweetTWFosterCMcGuiganMRBriceG. Quantitation of resistance training using the session rating of perceived exertion method. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(4):796-802.
47.
WilliamsSTrewarthaGCrossMJKempSPTStokesKA. Monitoring what matters: a systematic process for selecting training-load measures. Int J Sports Physiol Perf. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S2101-S2106.
48.
WisbeyBMontgomeryPGPyneDBRattrayB. Quantifying movement demands of AFL football using GPS tracking. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13:531-536.
49.
YoungDCoratellaGMaloneSKieranCLaurentMBeatoM. The match-play sprint performance of elite senior hurlers during competitive games. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215156.
